[Second docker network? Or just WG?]

8 hours ago, itimpi said:

In which case the container does not need to access the gateway itself (it is just accepting inbound requests FROM the gateway) as long as you can access the container via the wg3 network remotely then that should be enough.

I can access the container remotely but the container has access to the server via the wg3 address 10.253.3.1.... how can I make sure the container cannot see the server. is it possible when the server itself is its route back to the internet?

[Second docker network? Or just WG?]

Just now, itimpi said:

In which case the container does not need to access the gateway itself (it is just accepting inbound requests FROM the gateway) as long as you can access the container via the wg3 network remotely then that should be enough.

that's a great point I didn't think about the fact that it just needs to accept inbounds and not outbounds...

Guess I have some testing to do

[Second docker network? Or just WG?]

sorry, forgot to mention: The docker does need access to the internet. and since it'll need to be accessed from the internet (for gameplay)

[Second docker network? Or just WG?]

So I am having an issue I need help with.

 

I currently run all my dockers on the default bridge. Everything works great.

 

What I want to do is one specific docker I want to open to the world (it's a MC server) and I want to use this as a "testing the waters" point for a new idea I had.

 

I want my new docker to be connected to the internet. I want to be able to manage said docker. But I do not want that docker to access my LAN or my server.

 

Some assumptions:

 

Gateway/Router = 192.168.1.1

unRAID = 192.168.1.10

 

What I was thinking was the docker could live in maybe its own wg network, call it wg3 (wg0-2 already in use for other things). then somehow wg3 needs access to the gateway, but only the gateway.

then when I Need to manage the docker I could also join wg3 by connecting to the VPN as a client.

 

 

1: does this sound like a good idea?

2: I tried putting it on wg3 and while I can get on wg3 with my computer, the docker cannot see the outside world...

[DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.8]

Works here now. updated 7:15am eastern on 3/12

[DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.8]

Just realized everyone is having htis issue

[DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.8]

Been using this tool forever! Love it.

 

Recently I removed the image (because I'm an idiot and didn't read the prompt when it asked if I had chosen the right docker to remove.

 

Anyway. I re-added via CA appstore and here's the error I get on startup...

 

 

https://pastebin.com/z6xzhPj7

[DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.8]

On 6/20/2018 at 2:28 PM, jbartlett said:

 

The others were reporting that error while scanning their hardware. This is the first I've seen it while doing a benchmark. Can you post a screen shot? You do not need to include the Java Stacktrace.

It just started working after a reboot... wtf?

[DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.8]

I too am getting the Array index [2] out of range, array size is [1] when trying to benchmark

[ESXi 5.x - pre-built VMDK for unRAID]

dead links in main post. anybody have final version vmdk for 5.0?

[cache_dirs - an attempt to keep directory entries in RAM to prevent disk spin-up]

my cache_dirs will randomly stop running (I don't know if it has to do with the fact that I am doing preclears)

 

is there a quick script anyone has that I can add to my crontab to make sure it's always running? (say run the script every 30 mins)

 

I can make something right quick but if someone already has that'd be sweet

 

thanks guys