-
-
ASUS RTX 2080 Super GPU Passthrough VBios Dumped and modified download
Just want to express my newfound happiness. My motherboard has only 1 USB controller (to my disappointment), but the USB-C port of 2080Ti comes to the rescue! Using 6.11.5, I just need to VFIO bind (on System Devices), restart, and then pass through the NVidia USB controller. It works! I attached a Dell WD19TB dock that's been laying around forever. It's thunderbolt connection but it works with USB-C. Also attached another USB Hub to the WD19TB. This gives a dozen of USB ports for plug-n-play purpose to the Windows 11 guest OS. Transfer rate is fast, but of course to be shared with all the plugged-in devices. I guess there will be overall bus power limit as well, but I plugged in 3 external SSDs together with a bunch of thumb drives and an SD Card, just to test. This made my day!
-
Dynamix - System Temp
I wonder if anyone managed to get module nct6775 working for NCT6791D chip? (this chip is what the sensors-detect output showing) I did `modprobe nct6775` and `modprobe nct6775 0x290` at the command line to no effect. The other command `modprobe coretemp` did result in sensors reporting the CPU temperature (only).
-
Defrag XFS array drives
I recently reformatted my disk1 from ReiserFS to XFS, and then I did rsync -avPX /mnt/disk4/ /mnt/disk1 When it's done I ran the xfs_db - frag-f, to my surprise the fragmentation level is 27%, I was kind of hoping to see 0%. Does rsync write some temporary files somewhere on destination drive, and then delete it after completion? Other than that, I'm not sure what might cause the rather significant fragmentation.
-
Dynamix - V6 Plugins
Autofan questions. Q1 I understand that autofan is controlling speed by pwm. Is it also working with 3-pin fans header with no PWM, that is, will it do voltage-based speed control using pin #3? If not, is there such plugin? Q2 I'm wondering about the issue of minimum PWM. I clicked DETECT next to "Minimum PWM value:" settings a few times, but the field remains blank. Meanwhile, syslog is reporting 0 rpm at certain PWM values, logs below. Is this all fine or do I need to adjust something somewhere? Oct 27 05:38:09 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 40C, adjusting fan speed from: 189 (74% @ 2265rpm) to: 145 (56% @ 1771rpm) Oct 27 05:43:14 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 145 (56% @ 1767rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1500rpm) Oct 27 06:08:23 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1500rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 06:13:28 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 34C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: OFF (0% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 06:23:33 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 36C, adjusting fan speed from: OFF (0% @ 0rpm) to: 57 (22% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 06:33:38 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 57 (22% @ 0rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 06:48:43 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 07:03:49 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 0C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: OFF (0% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 07:28:54 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: OFF (0% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 07:33:59 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1513rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 07:44:04 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 07:54:10 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1500rpm) Oct 27 07:59:15 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1510rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:04:20 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:14:25 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1496rpm) Oct 27 08:19:30 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1510rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:24:35 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:34:40 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1490rpm) Oct 27 08:39:45 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1510rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:44:51 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 08:54:56 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1486rpm) Oct 27 09:00:01 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1510rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 09:05:06 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 09:15:11 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 39C, adjusting fan speed from: 101 (39% @ 0rpm) to: 123 (48% @ 1503rpm) Oct 27 09:20:16 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 37C, adjusting fan speed from: 123 (48% @ 1510rpm) to: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) Oct 27 09:25:21 Tower autofan: Highest disk temp is 38C, adjusting fan speed from: 79 (30% @ 0rpm) to: 101 (39% @ 0rpm)
-
Preclear.sh results - Questions about your results? Post them here.
after 97 hours of 3 cycles of preclearing a 3TB drive, this is the result. There were 65535 sectors pending re-allocation for the whole time, and no sectors had been reallocated at any cycle. I guess I need to run another cycle or two, but wondering if the result will still be the same. ============================================================================ ** Changed attributes in files: /tmp/smart_start_sdd /tmp/smart_finish_sdd ATTRIBUTE NEW_VAL OLD_VAL FAILURE_THRESHOLD STATUS RAW_VALUE Seek_Error_Rate = 100 200 0 ok 0 Power_On_Hours = 89 90 0 ok 8064 Temperature_Celsius = 111 121 0 ok 41 No SMART attributes are FAILING_NOW 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation before the start of the preclear. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after pre-read in cycle 1 of 3. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after zero of disk in cycle 1 of 3. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after post-read in cycle 1 of 3. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after zero of disk in cycle 2 of 3. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after post-read in cycle 2 of 3. 65535 sectors were pending re-allocation after zero of disk in cycle 3 of 3. 65535 sectors are pending re-allocation at the end of the preclear, the number of sectors pending re-allocation did not change. 0 sectors had been re-allocated before the start of the preclear. 0 sectors are re-allocated at the end of the preclear, the number of sectors re-allocated did not change. ============================================================================
-
Preclear.sh results - Questions about your results? Post them here.
Thanks Joe! Also, I suppose there's no difference if I do one cycle at a time and repeat three times, rather than 3 cycles in one go?
-
Preclear.sh results - Questions about your results? Post them here.
I'm doing an initial preclear for my 3TB Seagate drive, the following is the result if the first cycle, should I be concerned with the 'near threshold' statuses? == ST3000DM001-9YN166 Z1F12YES == Disk /dev/sdb has been successfully precleared == with a starting sector of 1 ============================================================================ ** Changed attributes in files: /tmp/smart_start_sdb /tmp/smart_finish_sdb ATTRIBUTE NEW_VAL OLD_VAL FAILURE_THRESHOLD STATUS RAW_VALUE Raw_Read_Error_Rate = 115 117 6 ok 98467112 Spin_Retry_Count = 100 100 97 near_thresh 0 End-to-End_Error = 100 100 99 near_thresh 0 Airflow_Temperature_Cel = 57 64 45 near_thresh 43 Temperature_Celsius = 43 36 0 ok 43 No SMART attributes are FAILING_NOW 0 sectors were pending re-allocation before the start of the preclear. 0 sectors were pending re-allocation after pre-read in cycle 1 of 1. 0 sectors were pending re-allocation after zero of disk in cycle 1 of 1. 0 sectors are pending re-allocation at the end of the preclear, the number of sectors pending re-allocation did not change. 0 sectors had been re-allocated before the start of the preclear. 0 sectors are re-allocated at the end of the preclear, the number of sectors re-allocated did not change. a side note, I simultaneously precleared this disk with two other drives (2TB Hitachi and WD Green), surprisingly the preclear for this disk finished earlier!
ldrax
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited