Mr_Who

I just looked at the dashboard readings. Regardless of what the actual utilization of the CPU might be, I can see the transfer from the client to the cache is slow, which I do not understand. How can transfer to an SSD cache without the parity calculation be bottlenecked somehow?

Do you mean setting up different versions of UNraid? I know. Yet, slower CPUs have been used to obtain full utilization of the gigabit port. I will try this. The problem is a constant, not a periodical one.

Hi guys. First of, I'd like to say that it might just be me who are wrong about what I am about to ask. Is it normal for UNriad to utilize 87% procent of a dual core Celeron G1610T, maxing out the transfer speed at at around 90MB/s, from client to SSD cache on the UNriad server? It just seem so odd that this task of transferen a large single 22GB file to a SSD at something like 112MB/s is an impossible task to ask a Celeron G1610T server? It's only the cache working and I can confirm the drive/drives don't spin up for the client to server transfer. I just don't understand how this task can max out the CPU? In fact, I feel like the newest version: 6.11.5, have made everything slow? I have a Qnap TS-453A which also suddenly can't seem to perform the same numbers as it used to. I can't prove this since I have no logged numbers to back this up. It just seem like things are going heavy on the systems. I bought this HP Microserver Gen8 with a Celeron G1610T CPU and 4Gb of RAM for a senior friend of mine. The idea was to run it as a NAS with UNraid and a simple Jellyfin server, so he had a large central storage unit for all the films and movies he wants to digitally backup. I was the one selling him on the idea of using this server as a setup due to it's fair price listed on the used market. Now I am not sure if the server will even be able to keep up with the job of running Jellyfin without any transcoding... Am I setting my expectations too high for this old hardware?