Jump to content

slarco

Members
  • Posts

    176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by slarco

  1. What if my syslog weight more than 192k? Use a external host?

     

     

    Just paste as quote?

    zip it, (they zip really well) or, use ext host as you described.  For pre-clear results I really do not need to see the entire syslog.  You can attach only the pre-clear reports as found in /boot/preclear_reports

     

    Joe L.

     

    Ok, got the report on both drives.

     

    thx in advance

    both look fine.

     

    Thx Joe

  2. What if my syslog weight more than 192k? Use a external host?

     

     

    Just paste as quote?

    zip it, (they zip really well) or, use ext host as you described.  For pre-clear results I really do not need to see the entire syslog.  You can attach only the pre-clear reports as found in /boot/preclear_reports

     

    Joe L.

     

    Ok, got the report on both drives.

     

    thx in advance

    preclear_rpt__WD-WCAWZ1679024_2012-03-29.txt

    preclear_rpt__WD-WCAWZ1714217_2012-03-29.txt

  3. That drive's smart report looks good.

     

    I'm a bit confused... Have you run it through the preclear script?  (It's only been powered up about 64 hours)

     

    Yeah, I did run it through the preclear script. It took around 28 hours, and thats the syslog that i couldn't save properly to post here.

     

    The disk is unasigned now, and im planing to keep it that way until the day that my parity drive goes tothe roof with the "current pending sectors". Every day adds 2 or 3 to the count.

    I'd not wait if the current pending sectors on the parity drive are increasing by a few counts a day.  I'd replace it and get a RMA process started on the old one.

     

    Joe L.

     

    I could try to do that but the thing is that i live in Chile, and if I replace the drive now and another drive goes bad from now until March i will be F*****, because here in chile i don't have any chance to get that kind of drive.

     

    So I was expecting get the RMA in my next trip to the USA (march) and try to hang on with this drive until that.

    I see...

     

    If it is your parity drive you can actually take some preventative measures.   Here is an idea, see what you think.

     

    A sector pending re-allocation is one that the disk was unable to read properly.   The pending-reallocation logic is waiting for that same sector to be written again so it can re-allocate it from its spare pool of sectors.

     

    Unfortunately, the parity disk sectors are not normally written unless the equivalent sector on one of the data disks is written.

     

    What you could do is force unRAID to re-write all the parity disks sectors.  For 99.99999999% of them, it will write exactly the same contents as it currently contains.  For those 2 or three sectors it would give the SMART firmware the opportunity to re-allocate the sectors it could not read.

     

    The first step is to perform a normal parity "Check"

     

    This will allow all the drives to read all their sectors and if there are any un-readable, hopefully re-allocate them.  

     

    Once the parity check is complete, get a set of SMART reports, one from each of your drives.  Hopefully none of the data drives will have sectors pending re-allocation.

     

    Then, if there are pending-reallocation sectors only on the PARITY drive,

    Stop the array

    Un-assign the parity drive on the "devices" page.  (leave the parity disk unassigned for the next two steps)

    Start the array with the parity disk un-assigned.

    Stop the array once more.

    Re-assign the parity drive on the "devices" page.

    Start the array with the parity disk re-assigned.

     

    This last step will force unRAID to think the parity drive needs to be completely re-written.  It will, of course, be re-writing all the parity disks sectors, including those pending re-allocation.  For 99.99999999% of them, it will write exactly the same contents as it currently contains.  For those few sectors pending re-allocation it would give the SMART firmware the opportunity to re-allocate the sectors.

     

    With any luck this will allow the SMART firmware to re-allocate all the sectors pending re-allocation. You'll have the time to get to the USA in March to obtain a replacement drive.

     

    To re-group if anything goes drastically wrong (another disk concurrently fails) you can use the "trust my parity" procedure since you know that parity is good (the process above was just re-writing exactly what is already on the parity disk.) Then you would be in exactly the same situation as you are now if a data disk were to fail, using parity and the other data disks to simulate the failed disk.

     

    Joe L.

    Ok, Im on it.

     

    Thx Joe. I will let you know how things goes.

     

    I did all the process and went down to 9 errors. Better than 22 but still not what i was hoping for.

     

     

    THanks for the help anyway Joe

  4. That drive's smart report looks good.

     

    I'm a bit confused... Have you run it through the preclear script?  (It's only been powered up about 64 hours)

     

    Yeah, I did run it through the preclear script. It took around 28 hours, and thats the syslog that i couldn't save properly to post here.

     

    The disk is unasigned now, and im planing to keep it that way until the day that my parity drive goes tothe roof with the "current pending sectors". Every day adds 2 or 3 to the count.

    I'd not wait if the current pending sectors on the parity drive are increasing by a few counts a day.  I'd replace it and get a RMA process started on the old one.

     

    Joe L.

     

    I could try to do that but the thing is that i live in Chile, and if I replace the drive now and another drive goes bad from now until March i will be F*****, because here in chile i don't have any chance to get that kind of drive.

     

    So I was expecting get the RMA in my next trip to the USA (march) and try to hang on with this drive until that.

    I see...

     

    If it is your parity drive you can actually take some preventative measures.   Here is an idea, see what you think.

     

    A sector pending re-allocation is one that the disk was unable to read properly.   The pending-reallocation logic is waiting for that same sector to be written again so it can re-allocate it from its spare pool of sectors.

     

    Unfortunately, the parity disk sectors are not normally written unless the equivalent sector on one of the data disks is written.

     

    What you could do is force unRAID to re-write all the parity disks sectors.  For 99.99999999% of them, it will write exactly the same contents as it currently contains.  For those 2 or three sectors it would give the SMART firmware the opportunity to re-allocate the sectors it could not read.

     

    The first step is to perform a normal parity "Check"

     

    This will allow all the drives to read all their sectors and if there are any un-readable, hopefully re-allocate them.  

     

    Once the parity check is complete, get a set of SMART reports, one from each of your drives.  Hopefully none of the data drives will have sectors pending re-allocation.

     

    Then, if there are pending-reallocation sectors only on the PARITY drive,

    Stop the array

    Un-assign the parity drive on the "devices" page.  (leave the parity disk unassigned for the next two steps)

    Start the array with the parity disk un-assigned.

    Stop the array once more.

    Re-assign the parity drive on the "devices" page.

    Start the array with the parity disk re-assigned.

     

    This last step will force unRAID to think the parity drive needs to be completely re-written.  It will, of course, be re-writing all the parity disks sectors, including those pending re-allocation.  For 99.99999999% of them, it will write exactly the same contents as it currently contains.  For those few sectors pending re-allocation it would give the SMART firmware the opportunity to re-allocate the sectors.

     

    With any luck this will allow the SMART firmware to re-allocate all the sectors pending re-allocation. You'll have the time to get to the USA in March to obtain a replacement drive.

     

    To re-group if anything goes drastically wrong (another disk concurrently fails) you can use the "trust my parity" procedure since you know that parity is good (the process above was just re-writing exactly what is already on the parity disk.) Then you would be in exactly the same situation as you are now if a data disk were to fail, using parity and the other data disks to simulate the failed disk.

     

    Joe L.

    Ok, Im on it.

     

    Thx Joe. I will let you know how things goes.

  5. That drive's smart report looks good.

     

    I'm a bit confused... Have you run it through the preclear script?  (It's only been powered up about 64 hours)

     

    Yeah, I did run it through the preclear script. It took around 28 hours, and thats the syslog that i couldn't save properly to post here.

     

    The disk is unasigned now, and im planing to keep it that way until the day that my parity drive goes tothe roof with the "current pending sectors". Every day adds 2 or 3 to the count.

    I'd not wait if the current pending sectors on the parity drive are increasing by a few counts a day.  I'd replace it and get a RMA process started on the old one.

     

    Joe L.

     

    I could try to do that but the thing is that i live in Chile, and if I replace the drive now and another drive goes bad from now until March i will be F*****, because here in chile i don't have any chance to get that kind of drive.

     

    So I was expecting get the RMA in my next trip to the USA (march) and try to hang on with this drive until that.

  6. That drive's smart report looks good.

     

    I'm a bit confused... Have you run it through the preclear script?  (It's only been powered up about 64 hours)

     

    Yeah, I did run it through the preclear script. It took around 28 hours, and thats the syslog that i couldn't save properly to post here.

     

    The disk is unasigned now, and im planing to keep it that way until the day that my parity drive goes tothe roof with the "current pending sectors". Every day adds 2 or 3 to the count.

     

     

     

  7. Lol..i didnt save the syslog properly, any chance that i can recover it??

     

     

    server is still up and running

     

    Or should i just run the preclear again??

    Why?  There was nothing wrong with what you posted.  The drive looked fine.

     

    Because i just checked the syslog that i have here and is empty, so I thougt that the one that I posted is empty too...

     

    So i have no idea if the drive is good or not

     

     

     

    perhaps we are talking about different drives.

     

    In any case, you can get the full SMART report on the drive by typing:

    smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sdX

    where sdX = the device name of your specific device.

     

    There is no need to run the preclear script just wait hours for it to invoke that exact same command to see the final status of the drive.

     

    Joe L.

     

    Ok, this is the status o the new drive.

     

    Seems fine to me, but im not an expert. Can you tell me if it it's fine? I am planing to use this drive to replac my parity. Every day get 1 or 2 more current pending sector.

     

     

    Thanks in advance !

    Syslog.txt

  8. Lol..i didnt save the syslog properly, any chance that i can recover it??

     

     

    server is still up and running

     

    Or should i just run the preclear again??

    Why?  There was nothing wrong with what you posted.  The drive looked fine.

     

    Because i just checked the syslog that i have here and is empty, so I thougt that the one that I posted is empty too...

     

    So i have no idea if the drive is good or not

     

     

     

  9. I have one more syslog if anyone can take a look at this.

     

    I did check it for reallocated sectors and pending sectors. Seems fine to me but I been here for a short time.

     

    Thanks!

     

     

    Hoe is good because im already moving data xD

    It is fine.

     

    The only counter that incremented was the "load-cycle" counter.  And if it had NOT incremented there would have been a HUGE issue, because it would then indicate the disk heads did not move from their parked position.

     

    Enjoy your new drive.   for now, at least, it is working well. 

    (good cooling... the temp did not change from 29C at its start.  You must have good fans)

     

    04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ============================================================================
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Disk /dev/sdc has been successfully precleared
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Ran 1 preclear-disk cycle
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Using :Read block size = 8225280 Bytes
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Last Cycle's Pre Read Time  : 7:34:51 (73 MB/s)
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Last Cycle's Zeroing time   : 7:18:06 (76 MB/s)
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Last Cycle's Post Read Time : 14:48:50 (37 MB/s)
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Last Cycle's Total Time     : 29:42:54
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Total Elapsed Time 29:42:54
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Disk Start Temperature: 29C
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: == Current Disk Temperature: 29C, 
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ==
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ============================================================================
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: S.M.A.R.T. error count differences detected after pre-clear 
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: note, some 'raw' values may change, but not be an indication of a problem
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: 63c63
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: < 193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       76
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ---
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: > 193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       77 
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]: ============================================================================
    Oct 21 04:04:16 Tower preclear_disk-diff[32619]:  

     

    Thanks Joe for taking the time to review the Logs. I have 2 Enermax 120mm + 2 Enermax 80mm fans

  10. Hey! Im back here again because i just finished the Preclear for a new drive and i was hoping to get some help with the syslog. Ilooked for the reallocated sectors and in my knowledge seems to be Ok.

     

     

    Syslog attached if anyone can take a look and give me some advice about the drive.

     

    Thx in advance!!

    Looks good.  No re-allocated sectors, or sectors pending re-allocation.  No parameters FAILING_NOW, nor any where the current value is nearing the failure-threshold.  (You can see several changing from the factory 253 value to the starting value of 200.)

     

    You must have very good air flow past that drive, since its temperature only rose from 26C to 28C during the clearing cycle that lasted over 27 hours.  Nice.  ;D

     

    Thanks Joe. FYI Im using 2 X 120mm Enermax Fans in the front and 2 X 80 mm Enermax fans in the rear. Both are really quiet, I love them .

  11. Hi. I Just finished running the preclear script in 2 of my drives and i was wondering if anyone can give me some help in interpretate the syslogs.

     

    I read in this post about similar Syslogs and the Raw & UDMA errors and seems to e normal, but i just rather double check before start moving data.

     

    Syslogs attached

     

    Thanks in advance!

     

    Everything looks normal.  Enjoy your new drives.

     

     

    Yay...!!!!!!

  12. Hi. I Just finished running the preclear script in 2 of my drives and i was wondering if anyone can give me some help in interpretate the syslogs.

     

    I read in this post about similar Syslogs and the Raw & UDMA errors and seems to e normal, but i just rather double check before start moving data.

     

    Syslogs attached

     

    Thanks in advance!

    syslog_21-9-2010-1000.txt

    syslog_22-9-2010-0940.txt

×
×
  • Create New...