andypdmg

Hi, Really strange, it would only allow an Exclusive Share if there was only a single disk in the pool, now it's just working for the raid pool. I don't understand why as I haven't changed anything (I think!).

Hi, Thanks for your input, and to clarify, I can't combine using the Raid-Z1 pool as a stand alone share AND as the Cache Drive for my Array unless I'm prepared to accept 500MBps transfer speeds. Exclusive Shares don't work with my Raid-Z1 pool because it spans over multiple NVMe disks? I can only use the Raid-Z1 pool at (what I'd call) realistic speeds if it's a Disk Share. I can't get around this by using a different Cache Drive for the array because I can't copy between Disk Shares and User Shares. --- OR will this work because the disk share is writing to a cache disk and not the array? I assume that would work if mover has completed the move to the arrray, but if it hasn't, there is still a potential for data loss? Am I missing something here? Thanks

Thanks JorgeB, using a disk share gave the full performance as expected.

I should add that I deal with lots of big files, so a 500MBps difference is quite a bit deal for me. Thanks

Hi All, I've searched google / forums and not found any direct solution to this issue, but apologies if it's been covered and I didn't find it! I'm having an issue where mounting an NVMe disk in UD acheives a write speed of 1GBps, saturating a 10Gbe network. I'm really happy with this. If I mount that disk as a pool, I'm getting around half at 500MBps write speed. I've checked things like Direct IO are enabled, but can't find a solution. Can anyone shed any light on this? My ultimate aim is to have 5 x 2TB NVMe as a RAID5 (or RAID-Z1) so I have a little more redundancy. Thanks!