mbryanr

Members
  • Posts

    1294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mbryanr

  1.   5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct  0x0033  001  001  005    Pre-fail  Always  FAILING_NOW 1360

    196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032  031  031  000    Old_age  Always      -      1414

    197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0022  070  070  000    Old_age  Always      -      709

     

     

     

    A good indicator that the drive is in the process of failing.

  2. No problems.  There was a an issue with the initial firmware that could cause data corruption. Any models built from 12/10-current had the updated firmware, although that was klutzed up as well...keeping the same firmware rev number. Many updated to the JP fw due to this.  Upgrading if you have an older drive is simple, and not required if you have a drive built with a build date >= 12/10.

     

    http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=9339.msg112090#msg112090

     

    another thread on the issue:

    http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=8012.0

  3. Not knowing more tools to troubleshoot, I wonder if the disk.cfg or super.dat somehow already has the 3TB serial number stored.

     

    It would invalidate parity, but you could run the new configuration utility, and then add the drive. Take a screen shot of your current drive configuration.

     

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

  4. also to check any processes preventing disks from unmounting.

    To identify processes holding a disk busy you can type:

    fuser -mv /mnt/disk* /mnt/user/*

     

    To terminate processes holding a disk busy you can type (example is for disk1):

    fuser -mvk /mnt/disk1

     

    or you can individually terminate individual process IDs by typing

    kill PID

    (where PID = the numberic process ID as printed by the prior fuser -mv command)

  5.  

    I'm using this build mainly for network media sotrage, but I would like to be able to do some transacoding of SD/DVD videos via Serviio, run a bittorrent server, and and a few other menail tasks. Aside from dropping a bit more RAM in this box (I'm planning on 4GB already) should this build be sufficient?

     

    Memory is cheap.  Go with 8GB.

  6. Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: flush-9:4: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x8020

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: Pid: 21691, comm: flush-9:4 Tainted: G          O 3.4.4-unRAID #1

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: Call Trace:

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c1062e3a>] warn_alloc_failed+0xbd/0xcf

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c10636b2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x47c/0x4a5

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c1005858>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x64/0xcc

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c107f030>] ? T.603+0x23/0x126

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c107f0c0>] T.603+0xb3/0x126

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c10057f4>] ? dma_set_mask+0x37/0x37

    ......

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: mvsas 0000:02:00.0: mvsas prep failed[0]!

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: flush-9:4: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x8020

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: Pid: 21691, comm: flush-9:4 Tainted: G          O 3.4.4-unRAID #1

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel: Call Trace:

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c1062e3a>] warn_alloc_failed+0xbd/0xcf

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c10636b2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x47c/0x4a5

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c1005858>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x64/0xcc

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c107f030>] ? T.603+0x23/0x126

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c107f0c0>] T.603+0xb3/0x126

    Jul 25 14:34:35 Tower2 kernel:  [<c10057f4>] ? dma_set_mask+0x37/0x37

     

    Running a preclear as well?

    Jul 25 15:40:44 Tower2 preclear_disk-diff[29666]: == invoked as: ./preclear_disk.sh -A /dev/sdl

  7. First the "devices page" is the first page of the unRAID web interface

     

    Assuming you have kept your disk assignments from the latest syslog posted,

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0035734 (sdb) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0416376 (sdc) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WCAZA7226740 (sdd) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WCAZAC986143 (sde) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0179096 (sdf) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0216140 (sdg) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-32R6B0_WD-WCAVY0716487 (sdh) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0122453 (sdi) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WMAZA0700430 (sdj) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD10EACS-00ZJB0_WD-WCASJ1019333 (sdk) 976762584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WCAZA5919059 (sdl) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EADS-00R6B0_WD-WCAVY0248388 (sdm) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WMAZA4714338 (sdn) 1953514584

    Jul 24 18:07:54 unRAID emhttp: WDC_WD20EARS-00J99B0_WD-WCAWZ0729087 (sdo) 1953514584

     

    IIRC and from your syslog... you are using a mac ?

    If so, follow this...<I only have a Windows Laptop so I don't know if this is accurate for your OS:>

    http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Telnet-on-Mac-OS-X

     

    This should get you to connect via terminal/telnet.

     

    Once you've connected to your server...

    enter the commands below <modifying sdX - where "X" is the correct disk identifier that you wish to run the smart test on:

     

    http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Troubleshooting#What_do_I_do_if_I_get_a_red_ball_next_to_a_hard_disk.3F

     

    This short test takes 1 to 3 minutes (remember to substitute your drive's identifier for 'sda' as described above)

    smartctl -d ata -tshort /dev/sda

  8. Would this motherboard work.

     

    Intel S2600CP2 SSI EEB Server Motherboard Dual LGA 2011 DDR3 1600

     

    Link

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121585

     

    Waaay overkill for unRAID.  Most MB/CPUs will stream HD to multiple clients. Read rates are more than sufficient. Your network will play the biggest factor. If you are transcoding, get plenty of memory and a powerful CPU ie i3 or greater. 

     

    There is a link to HD streaming testing that was completed somewhere here...