ntrlsur

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

ntrlsur's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

0

Reputation

  1. I am going to guess that the docker image might have gotten corrupted.. You might have to redo the config for docker. That it just a guess though.
  2. I feel like an idiot. I didn't even notice that I was excluding the same disk I was including.
  3. Figure I will toss in my 2 cents. I am currently running a FX-6300 with 8 gigs of ram on my unraid machine. It currently runs2 VMs. A Debian instance for all of my usenet stuff. (CP,SABnzb,sickrage,headphones etc..) and a Win server 2008R2 instance as a DC for my home. It also runs 2 dockers 1 plex and 1 OpenVPN and there is plenty of horse power to spare. I am also running a total of 10 disks. 7 storage spinners and 3 ssds in a cache pool for VMs and Dockers. I haven't noticed any heat issues but I upgraded my case fans to noctua NF-F12 fans to keep the case quiet. Checking my CPU temp now and its running at 25 C
  4. So this is got my mind stuck. I am currently trying to copy music from 1 place to another. I keep getting the shfs/user: shfs_create: assign_disk: (28) No space left on device errors in the logs. I have plenty of space free on the disks in question. I have attached a screen grab of my share and the disks in question. I have attached the Diagnostics as well. Does anyone have an idea of why I keep catching this error?
  5. for 300 I would pick it up just cause personally. If you dont buy it put me intouch with the folks selling it and I will.
  6. that is alot enterprise hardware. To put unraid on it would be underkill. What controller cards in the hardware would determine if things worked or not. Unraid might not see the hardware controller in the R410 or the addon card for the MD1000. unraid is stripped down so alot of linux drivers are not installed. Plus that would be a very noisy setup..
  7. Yes unraid will allow you to do that. If you break your mirrors in the windows world you will have a failed drive. You can take those disks and create an array for unraid. The min number of drives needed for unraid technically would be 1. To get parity protection min number is 2. 1 array drive and 1 parity drive. unraid can grow as you add drive. For your situation I would pull the 2 drives from different mirrors. Set 1 drive as array and the other as parity. (The largest disk needs to always be the parity drive) Copy the data from one broken mirror to array. Take the drive that data was copied from in the windows world and move that to unraid and grow the array. Once the array has expanded copy the data from the second mirror set to unraid. Once that data has been copied take the final drive from the windows world and move it to unraid. You will then have a 4.5TB of space in the array and a 1.5tb drive as the parity drive.
  8. I don't think the backplane on the 2950 will support anything other then a dell card I believe it is a vendor lock in issue..
  9. The virus ran and attacked files on a windows share. All the damage was done from windows not from UnRaid.
  10. I was trying to find this program the other day - but the link to the download for version 1.3 is broken on the kodi forum. Do you know where I can find it elsewhere? Here you go. I zipped up my copy and removed the database.
  11. I use a various selection of tools. But when I was first trying to get things organized I used Ember Media Manager Great program and it makes your media library portable. I have attached a screenshot of it for you.
  12. You can do a cache pool. The default raid state is 1 I remember seeing a post tom or jonp made that said you can change is to raid0 but after reboots then it defaults back to raid1. I can't find that post though..
  13. The screenshot does not show it mounted as cache. Are you sure you have added as cache?
  14. Maybe we should edit the WIKI and indicate there are odd issues with some SAS(2) 9480 controllers. Since they are the least resistance to setting up, as in doesn't need to be flashed and works out of the box. As drives become larger and larger we will eventually do away with controller cards ( just as old adaptec cards are dead ) and use onboard controllers. But there will always be users that have a need for extra controllers for full systems. I agree. I got the sas2 because it was on the wiki and was plug and play.
  15. I would have imagined better performance. Maybe its the H310? I have a smaller array with a couple of older drives on a sas2lp I have attached my diskspeed for comparision.