Jump to content

GyroDragona

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GyroDragona

  1. I have managed to snag a AMD 5950x and I intend to upgrade my unraid server with. I need to find a motherboard with good support in unraid. I'd really like to get something that has 2.5g for networking if possible.

     

    I’ve heard that Linux could have problems with nvme drive, is that the case with unraid? I was planning on putting two 1TB ones into the server for the cache. I bought them even before covid started and have been earmarked for this upgrade. They are both Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB M.2 NVMe.

  2. On 12/16/2020 at 9:17 PM, ich777 said:

    I'm not very familar with Among Us. Can you tell me for what this is needed/used exactly?

    Have you considered making this docker since I responded to this question?

     

    It’s a distance based voice chat for Among Us. All the info for it is in the link I first provided about it.

  3. 9 hours ago, ich777 said:

    I went to this site and downloaded the Java Development Kit 15 (since I don't wanted to create a dedicated account for Java 11 to download).

     

    These are the steps I did:

    1. Download the app from the CA App
    2. Changed the serverfilename to: 'paper-1.16.4-318'
    3. Changed accept EULA to: 'true'
    4. Let the container start and download the runtime
    5. Put the file that I downloaded above in the runtime directory
    6. Extracted the file in the runtime directory and deleted the .tar.gz file
    7. Changed the runtime name to: 'jdk-15.0.1' and restarted the container
    8. Waited for the EULA accept and that the world was generated and everything works

    Oh, I specifically went with Java 11 because it is the only current Long Term Support version that is out right now. I'll give it another go with Java 11 and the steps you used and see if things work out any differently this time around.

  4. 9 hours ago, ich777 said:

    I will test this out after the weekend if that's ok for you, weekends are family time for me.

    Ya, of course that's fine. It's your time. I'm not going to tell you how to spend it. Frankly I'm thankful that you spend any of your time making these dockers for us much less supporting them. I'm working with a fresh docker for testing getting a Java update in place so it would not interfere with the ones I already have going so it's not causing me any immediate problems. Have a good weekend. :)

    • Thanks 1
  5. 3 hours ago, ich777 said:

    I don't know if it would break something if I upgrade it in general so that the container always pulls Java 11 (jDownloader would completely break if I do that - also uses this runtime).

    But of course you could do this:

    Download the version of java that you want to use for (Linux 64bit!)

    Got to your Minecraft folder in your appdata directory and open the runtime folder and delte this folder: jre1.8.0_241

    Extract the downloaded into the runtime folder

    Go to your template, click on 'Show more settings' and change 'Runtime Name' from 'basicjre' to the exact folder name that lives in your runtime folder

     

    The server should then use the new java version, below is an example but for jre1.8.0_241 just as an example.

    Bildschirmfoto_2020-12-04_07-50-36.thumb.png.568d5440570b98147c6a85d4fb0af374.png

     

    I went to https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase-jdk11-downloads.html and got "Linux x64 Compressed Archive" droped into SSH and navigated to the runtime directory (where I put the downloaded file), ran "tar -xf ./jdk-11.0.9_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz" tried changing "Runtime Name" to "jdk-11.0.9". I did check that the ownership and permissions were correct after unpacking Java 11 and they look correct.

     

    As soon as I change "Runtime Name" it breaks the server. Even if I change it back to "basicjre" It will refuse to fully boot anymore even when it is the only change that is made to a already working server. I can't seem to figure out why. I'm doing it with a fresh Docker setup.

     

    logs.txt

    latest.log

     

    IMG_0065.PNG

     

    The logs and screenshot are after I changed the setting back.

     

    You should be able to replicate my problem by starting with a fresh docker from your docker install, have it boot fully at least once with default settings then do the steps I did to install Java 11. I left the original runtime in place so I could switch between them during testing. I could extract the archive (and not yet change "Runtime Name") and still have it work fine. As soon as I change it then it will no longer function even if I change it back.

  6. I love your Minecraft container. I have had a couple containers running for about a month now. I am running Paper on both containers but it seems paper is going to be cutting of Java 8 support and moving to the next LTS version of Java 11 (there is also Java 17 LTS coming Sep 2021 later). I was wondering if there was a container update or an easy(-ish) way to update the version of java in the container. I did notice you keep it within the "runtime" directory but I am unsure how one might update what is in there and have the container use the newer version by default.

     

    Relevant info:

    https://papermc.io/forums/t/java-11-mc-1-17-and-paper/5615

  7. If you change the default directory for ServerFiles from the default "/mnt/cache/appdata/minecraft" to say something like "/mnt/cache/appdata/minecraft/dan" the Minecraft docker will fail to launch. I spent 4 hours trying to figure out why if I moved it to a sub directory the server started having problems. Made a new one with a subdirectory within the minecraft one with a new docker setup just for it to not even launch. I couldn't tell you why though.

  8. 21 hours ago, juanamingo said:

    Hey man, first off - thanks for all the work you do with all your docker images!  Much appreciated.

     

    Secondly.... "Ni"!

     

    Finally, to my issue.... i just did a fresh install of this image, changed nothing on the install (not even the pw - and none of the ports are conflicting) and get to the login, login with root / mineos and get a `This site can't be reached` and the web ui seems to have crashed - have to restart it to access the login.

    Can't get in no matter what.

     

    Any suggestions (anything else i can provide detail wise to help troubleshoot)?

     

    Thanks in advance!

     

    Same thing for me actually. I noticed him mentioning that it needs to be run as root. It seems to be set to out of the box from what I can see in the settings for the docker but it's still a no go.

  9. I have had CA Backup / Restore Appdata installed for ages but I guess it didn’t take or something. I thought it was doing backups but I guess I didn’t save the configuration or something got messed up with it. I don’t know. I do keep backups but this time they just were not being made. 

  10. Multicore on #btrfs spent hours trying to help me but there just wasn't any luck to be had. There was just too much weirdness going on with the drive and btrfs. Superbocks were in the wrong places, the drive vanishing from the btrfs setup. Something with unraid mangled things and I have no clue how it managed to do it.

     

    I gave up.

     

    I ended up wiping the drives, formated them and got them properly set up as a mirror btrfs. I wasn't able to recover any useable/useful data from the old setup other than a single config file. It's a wash. That said, thank you very much for your help and time in trying to help me out.

  11. 19 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

    Post output of:

    
    btrfs fi usage -T /x

     

    Untitled.png.bd644f07486c0b64af0e3bc8b10450ea.png

     

    19 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

    Create a new share called e.g. backup and then copy from /x to /mnt/user/backup

    Is there anything special I need to do maintain permissions and ownership with the copy?

  12. 12 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

    Like mentioned you should try the command on both devices (and both should always be connected), please post a screenshot of terminal (including the commands) after typing these commands, I find it odd that none of them worked:

    
    mkdir /x
    mount -o degraded,usebackuproot,ro /dev/sdc1 /x

    Assuming device letters are the same as the screenshot if not make the appropriate correction.

     

    Untitled.png

     

    Oh, it didn't kick out an error. Is there a way to know if data from both drives or just the one is there?

     

    Where do I copy stuff so it is on the protected array to make it work from the protected array for now?

  13. 14 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

    Make sure you try all the options (except check --repair) on the FAQ on both cache devices, if none of them work best bet is to ask for help on #btrfs on freenode IRC. It's usually frequented by actual btrfs developers or very experienced users and they are very helpful there.

    I have followed those instructions on the link but it just kicks out the same bad superblock there and I can't seem to talk in that IRC group and there does not seem to be and instructions on how to gain that right within the group. I'm kind of out of options and my server has been doing for about 4 days now.

     

    With it being a two drive cache is it possible to bring up both drives with info from the second drive?

  14. 19 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

    Yes, just start the array as is, cache will still be unmountable and you can try the recovery options.

     

    Not without the diagnostics from when the problem started, also see here for better pool monitoring.

     

    It kicked out:
    mount: /x: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.

  15. 43 minutes ago, johnnie.black said:

    One of the devices is considered missing (despite being assigned), this suggests the superblock is damaged, and it's failing to mount read/write with a single device due to no redundancy, at least partially (this could be the result of the pool not being redundant if it was created during v6.7.x due to a bug):

     

    
    May 28 12:33:14 unRAID kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdc1): chunk 101054414848 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writeable mount
    May 28 12:33:14 unRAID kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdc1): writeable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices

     

    You should be able to recover the data by mounting read only, see here.

     

    Is there a way to do this with mounting the main array while mounting the cache array as read only and just shifting it all over to the protected array? I'm not super good with messing about with commands on UnRAID.

     

    Do you have any guesses about what might cause corruption to the superblock? The server has a UPS that's only half a year old and can keep the server running for about an hour with drive activity and I have not done any hard power downs or resets of the system in a non clean manner. It started giving problems while it was all still running.

  16. On 11/27/2019 at 10:03 AM, CHBMB said:

    2019-11-27_18-03.thumb.png.aa8f4cb55020036555ffb40f4d193c40.png

     

    Click that.

    I was able to figure it out. Finding the location in the GUI was not the problem I was having. I have 3 drives to do and only one was showing up at any one time for some reason. I popped in a USB 3.0 card and have two plugged into it and one into the USB 3.0 built into the motherboard and all of them show fine at the same time now. I'm well into my drive tests.

     

    Untitled.png

     

    The drive that is only doing one clear instead of two already went through and completed a clear while waiting for the USB 3.0 card.

×
×
  • Create New...