Liggysmalls

Version 6.5.2 2018-05-15 There seriously isn't an easier way?

For some reason, in a spell of sleep deprived delerium I renamed my syncthing container to Syncthing because the lack of title case was bothering me for some unknown reason. Now I can't edit the container and when I click to update I am presented with the following message: "Configuration not found. Was this container created using this plugin?" Is there any easy way I can fix this? It really feels like that alone should not have broken everything.

Thank you for the reference, I guess this is just the way it is then. Much appreciated.

Yes I have, it didn't correct the issue. Seems rather pointless to have this column taking up pixels if it's not expected to be correct. While I understand that the available space in the pool is dictated by the smallest drive I can't help but question if it's actually functioning properly when I see something like this. This value must be polled from somewhere that's clearly not returning the expected value for this configuration. Is the interface wrong or am I about to experience some catastrophic failure?

I replaced a cache drive in my pool earlier today with a larger drive following the basic procedure in the wiki: https://lime-technology.com/wiki/UnRAID_6/Storage_Management#Replace_a_disk Everyting appeared to go as planned, the new drive appeared to be getting a fresh copy of all the data. The total size was initially reported as 240gb (the size of the new disk I installed) which wasn't correct as the pool initially contained identical 120gb drives. I thought this was odd so I started searching for answers, as the drive was taking new data I saw this number fall so I figured btrfs might just figure it all out in the end. That's apparently not the case and after about 6 hours the size is reporting at 180gb and it appears to be done moving. Attached is a screenshot of what I am seeing. Any help would be much appreciated!

This is a new installation, Unraid shows my CPU pairing information correctly if I look at the output of Tools > System devices. The CPU ids are correctly displayed here and confirmed with manual editing of a VM XML file: CPU Thread Pairings cpu 0 <===> cpu 8 cpu 1 <===> cpu 9 cpu 2 <===> cpu 10 cpu 3 <===> cpu 11 The problem is the interface for setting up or editing a new VM which displays CPU 0-3 correctly but does not show CPU 8-11 but rather displays CPU 4-7. If any of these nonexistent CPU ids are selected you are not able to save the configuration as one might expect. I have attached a screenshot for reference. Is there any way to adjust these id values to reflect the actual configuration of the system, having to fiddle with the XML directly isn't difficult just a bit annoying.