ozzyc
-
Posts
28 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by ozzyc
-
-
13 hours ago, binhex said:
ok thats fine, try the following:-
1. try a different browser on the same machine
2. try a different machine on your lan
3. check proxy is NOT set in browser
what is the url you are using to attempt connection to the web ui?
Have been using chrome on my desktop,tried safari on my phone and I get ‘safari cannot open the page because it could not connect to the server’
normally I navigate to 192.168.1.10 to get to UnRAID > docker tab > SAB icon > WebUI
this opens a new tab to 192.168.1.10:8080
i also tried just manually specifying 192.168.1.10:8080
all I can think is if something else is fighting for port 8080?
maybe I’m looking in the wrong place but when I look at docker allocations I don’t see anything using 8080
Or maybe I need to add a new port from container port 8080 to host port 8080?Added some screenshots
-
12 hours ago, binhex said:
thats a clean log, no issues there, what is the ip of the machine running the web browser that you are attempting to connect to the sab web ui?
The machine I am running the web browser on uses DHCP and is currently on 192.168.1.121
The UnRAID machine is static on 192.168.1.10
-
19 hours ago, binhex said:
something is causing a reset on the vpn provider end, from your log:-
2023-01-15 16:55:34 Connection reset, restarting [-1] 2023-01-15 16:55:34 SIGHUP[soft,connection-reset] received, process restartingyou need to try another endpoint, that one looks broken, you are currently using:-
us-chi.torguard.comTried a different server, seems like the server connects but still no UI
-
11 hours ago, binhex said:
log attached
its all a bit above my head, but I did scroll through it and it sounds like I must have a wrong config somewhere causing the connection to be reset, I noticed 'SIGHUP[soft,connection-reset] received, process restarting' repeating
-
On 1/7/2023 at 6:27 AM, binhex said:
Change the values for name_servers, the pia name servers are junk, start with IP 209, so remove both from the list.
Sent from my 22021211RG using Tapatalk
any further thoughts? I have taken it down to just using 1.1.1.1 for my VPN and I still cant get into the gui, when I select WebUI in UnRAID a tab opens tohttp://192.168.1.10:8080 and the web gui does not load and I still get This site can’t be reached
-
I tried removing all name_servers IPs and setting it to just use cloudflare's 1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1 but no change. I have debug on and can see that it seems to be up and running, it shows it is able to resolve www.google.com and is showing my VPN IP, but when I select WebUI in UnRAID a tab opens tohttp://192.168.1.10:8080 and the web gui does not load and I still get This site can’t be reached
I am not sure if there are any more logs or anything I can pull to help understand what might be my problem?
docker run
-d
--name='binhex-sabnzbdvpn'
--net='bridge'
--cpuset-cpus='0,1,16,17'
--privileged=true
-e TZ="America/Chicago"
-e HOST_OS="Unraid"
-e HOST_HOSTNAME="Factory1"
-e HOST_CONTAINERNAME="binhex-sabnzbdvpn"
-e 'VPN_ENABLED'='yes'
-e 'VPN_USER'='REDACTED'
-e 'VPN_PASS'='REDACTED'
-e 'VPN_PROV'='custom'
-e 'VPN_OPTIONS'=''
-e 'STRICT_PORT_FORWARD'='no'
-e 'ENABLE_PRIVOXY'='no'
-e 'LAN_NETWORK'='192.168.1.0/24'
-e 'NAME_SERVERS'='1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1'
-e 'ADDITIONAL_PORTS'='8081'
-e 'DEBUG'='true'
-e 'UMASK'='000'
-e 'PUID'='99'
-e 'PGID'='100'
-l net.unraid.docker.managed=dockerman
-l net.unraid.docker.webui='http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/'
-l net.unraid.docker.icon='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/binhex/docker-templates/master/binhex/images/sabnzbd-icon.png'
-p '8083:8083/tcp'
-p '8095:8095/tcp'
-p '8118:8118/tcp'
-v '/mnt/user/appdata/data':'/data':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Transfers/Usenet/complete/':'/complete':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Transfers/Usenet/watch/':'/watch':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Docker/AppData/binhex-sabnzbdvpn':'/config':'rw,shared' 'binhex/arch-sabnzbdvpn'baaa5a41c5f5ae3f122303402bc64421b9670cfbc5abe3ddfd250d2a9576c144
The command finished successfully! -
Hi,
I am stuck here and looking for some help. I have tried figuring this out on my own and have not been able to find a solution so if it has already been answered I apologize.
I have been running binhex-sabnzbdvpn in UnRAID for quite a while with no problem at all but lately I can not connect to the GUI, when I try to connect in Chrome I get This site can't be reached 192.168.1.10 refused to connect ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED. It seems like the container is running but I cant seem to connect to it. I tried both with VPN set to yes like usual, and thought maybe my problem is VPN related so I tried turning the VPN setting to no but either way I have not been able to connect.
Any thoughts?
docker run
-d
--name='binhex-sabnzbdvpn'
--net='bridge'
--cpuset-cpus='0,1,16,17'
--privileged=true
-e TZ="America/Chicago"
-e HOST_OS="Unraid"
-e HOST_HOSTNAME="Factory1"
-e HOST_CONTAINERNAME="binhex-sabnzbdvpn"
-e 'VPN_ENABLED'='yes'
-e 'VPN_USER'='REDACTED'
-e 'VPN_PASS'='REDACTED'
-e 'VPN_PROV'='custom'
-e 'VPN_OPTIONS'=''
-e 'STRICT_PORT_FORWARD'='no'
-e 'ENABLE_PRIVOXY'='no'
-e 'LAN_NETWORK'='192.168.1.0/24'
-e 'NAME_SERVERS'='209.222.18.222,84.200.69.80,37.235.1.174,1.1.1.1,209.222.18.218,37.235.1.177,84.200.70.40,1.0.0.1'
-e 'ADDITIONAL_PORTS'='8081'
-e 'DEBUG'='true'
-e 'UMASK'='000'
-e 'PUID'='99'
-e 'PGID'='100'
-l net.unraid.docker.managed=dockerman
-l net.unraid.docker.webui='http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/'
-l net.unraid.docker.icon='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/binhex/docker-templates/master/binhex/images/sabnzbd-icon.png'
-p '8083:8083/tcp'
-p '8095:8095/tcp'
-p '8118:8118/tcp'
-v '/mnt/user/appdata/data':'/data':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Transfers/Usenet/complete/':'/complete':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Transfers/Usenet/watch/':'/watch':'rw'
-v '/mnt/user/Docker/AppData/binhex-sabnzbdvpn':'/config':'rw,shared' 'binhex/arch-sabnzbdvpn'73106a6690d5a98eb1cceb256ed1a212aa24d0fe2bf25f4622c6a189c25be1fe
-
On 1/7/2020 at 6:39 PM, ramblinreck47 said:
I've begun to recommend this very thing to people that want a case that can hold a lot of hot-swap drives. Buy a Supermicro CSE-846, put it on its side, then put it on two of these: https://www.amazon.com/HumanCentric-PC-Stand-Computer-Adjustable/dp/B07RGRV1VX/ref=sr_1_7?keywords=desktop+computer+cart&qid=1578443780&sr=8-7 . Problem solved.
''ADJUSTABLE WIDTH: Fits computer towers / pcs / CPUs with a width of 4.7” – 8.2” and supports a maximum weight of 22 lbs" - not problematic? I dont know much about rack mount stuff, it says max width of 8.2", how many rack units do u think that is?
or what about just a piece of wood to keep the rack ear from digging into the floor?
-
I know a lot of workstations have kits to rack mount them, and with the disappearing 5.25" bay trend, I am starting to wonder if there is a way to convert a rack mount chassis to tower? Just thinking about it i cant see why not, though im not dying for yet another custom fab project, hopefully there is a kit out there
-
all rebuilt and running, thanks guys!
will start running hardware diags soon to see where the problem came from
-
4 hours ago, johnnie.black said:
Docker image is corrupt, delete and recreate.
Should I be concerned as to why or how it became corrupt?
-
Hey guys,
I shut my system down to add a new drive.
After starting a pre-clear I noticed my docker apps wont load. I went check docker and it shows "Docker Service failed to start."
I tried cycling the docker service and got no change.
I opened my system logs and found this:
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 kernel: BTRFS error (device loop2): bad tree block start, want 13562658816 have 0
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 kernel: BTRFS error (device loop2): bad tree block start, want 13562658816 have 0
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 kernel: BTRFS warning (device loop2): failed to read root (objectid=2): -5
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 root: mount: /var/lib/docker: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop2, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 kernel: BTRFS error (device loop2): open_ctree failed
Dec 7 18:23:47 Factory1 root: mount errorI attached my diagnostics
does this sound like my SSD is going out or does it need some form of chkdsk for btrfs?
-
13 hours ago, jonathanm said:
Yes I did get a chance to review the port forwarding information there which does state port forwarding is supported. I get the impression all ports must be manually forwarded. I am not sure which port needs to be forwarded though?
Do I need to forward all container ports? or the ports shown as incoming and outgoing under preferences > network from within deluge?
-
Hey guys,
I am looking for some help with super slow performance on downloads. I know normally there is port forwarding required on routers to get good speeds but I am not sure how this works going through a VPN.
From what I have read delugevpn should be taking care of that on its own but it sounds like its vpn provider specific. Does this work with torguard? or are there ports I need to manually open and container settings to modify to get speeds back to normal?
-
Hey,
Not sure if there is a better place for me to be posting this, but im looking for a bit of help setting this up
I followed a guide (can find URL if needed, dont have it right infornt of me right now) to set this up but ran into a problem when pointing to my data source.
I am trying to use InfluxDB, I filled in the URL as being myserver's IP with port 8086, and the name of the database, and everything else default, which seems to work however when selecting save and test I am getting "InfluxDB Error: error parsing query: found IDENT, expected ; at line 1, char 30"
I am really not sure what to make of that or how to continue?
Once again, if theres a better place for me to be asking please just point me in the right direction.thanks!
-
This sounds like a dumb question and I am probably missing something super obvious, but how do I select which branch when adding the container in unraid?
-
as far as I know the endpoint I am using should support port forwarding, though I am not sure how I can verify that port forwarding is up and running properly.
I did notice when setting up ports none of them specified if they are TCP or UDP. Kitematic seemed to default to thinking they are TCP.
I can try posting a log here as mentioned above
-
I have been using TorGuard for my VPN
they do support port forwarding from what I can tell.
58946 is forwarded according to TorGuard, and i have specified deluge to use the same port number for incoming connections, random port for outgoing
-
Yes, i do understand that, but i feel it has something to do with how i have the container configured which as far as I can tell shouldn't matter what the host OS is, if I'm wrong, and I'm flat out in the wrong place, I completely understand, just reaching out wherever i can
-
Hey,
I have been trying to google and solve my own problems before bugging anybody here as much as I can and i have gotten to the point where my container is 'working' but performance is complete trash, 25 KiB/s and i simply don't understand why.
I am running docker in windows, I have created the container in windows, and poked around at it in Kitematic.
what useful information can I share to try to figure out why my speeds are awful? sorry i don't even know where to start on this
[Support] binhex - SABnzbdVPN
in Docker Containers
Posted
No clue what happened but I tested manually adding a port 8080 and everything is back... but I appreciate all your help, there were obviously other issues going on before trying that