marcusone1
-
Posts
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by marcusone1
-
-
2 hours ago, bonienl said:
You should make eth1 a bridge member of eth0 (br0).
Change the eth0 configuration and make both eth0 and eth1 a bridge member.
Ok, I will try that thank you.
Will that affect my VLANs on eth1?
Also note: eth0 is a 10G, and eth1 a 1G interface, does that matter... i.e. will eth0 still be used to access the unraid and files, dockers, and eth1 the KVM/others used on eth1?
-
21 hours ago, bonienl said:
How exactly did you configure eth0 and eth1 on Unraid?
(Sorry other image header was chopped off is eth0, which has the IP for unraid on it).
-
On 5/28/2022 at 10:42 AM, Warp3 said:
I was having this exact same issue but on a brand new VM with a fresh HASSOS qcow2 file (straight from Home Assistant's website) and couldn't for the life of me figure out why it wouldn't boot (since past UEFI boot issues have been due to Home Assistant OS updates breaking its own boot files but this was a fresh image file). I checked the XML view and sure enough it was set to raw instead of qcow2 for some reason. I changed that and it boots up just fine. I wonder what is causing unRAID to pick the wrong disk type.
Likely file extension, although I think manual just defaults to `raw`. I wish unraid would fix this bug or add to the UI a drop down list.
-
VLANs, or easier if you have multiple nics. More details on your system would help.
I have this working with VLANS and smart switches (unifi).
Once you have the bridge/nic installed and setup, you need to enable its use in the Docker -> Advanced menu.
KVMs I believe it just shows up in the list of available network sources
-
60 views and no ideas? should I email unraid directly? Thank you to those that took the time to read but unfortunately don't have an answer for me
-
I have several network adapters on my unRaid server 6.10.3.
Dockers run on the default eth0, aka, br0, well I assume that based upon choosing "Network Type" to "Bridge", it will use the same adapter that the unRaid web ui is presented on.
So a docker running on the default "bridge" network.
KVM running on eth1 (which i have connected to the same LAN as eth0, i wan't to spread out network traffic to KVMs vs File Share/dockers).
I can Access the KVMs and the Dockers just fine from another computer. Issues arrise when I try to access a Docker from the KVM.
I keep getting "connection reset by peer".
I assume some kind of firewall/issue on unRaid is causing this? or is it Docker? Is there a command I can run to fix this issue?
Thank you!
-
Did you ever solve this issue? I think I am a similar one.
-
I have a computer with an i5-6700, the motherboard has 2 displayport outputs. I have it plugged into an HDMI switch, but clearly the switch must not send an active signal unless the port that unRaid is on is selected.
So the issue I get is, I have no console output when I do switch to the port unRaid is on.
I can of course ssh/webgui shell into unRaid; so not a big issue. This is a test box and I'm constantly playing around and sometimes fine myself needing the physical console.
Is there a way to, via ssh, reset the display output for the unRaid console to rest and output to the monitor?
Or am i SOL as it is a bios issue?
Thanks!
-
30 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
It means to VM will start as if recovering from a crash/power loss.
Right... i figured that could be the case (i.e. files not written out to disk maybe lost/corrupted). Thanks for verifiying.
I've found a number of places that talk about live snapshots, but have yet to find a good guide on it (specificlly for unraid ideally, but any kvm howto would be good); do you know of any? -
3 hours ago, JorgeB said:
Yes, but the VM will be in a crash consistent state, since it wasn't shutdown at the time of the backup.
Thanks, but what does that mean? it doesn't work?
Does KVM not have any kind of live snapshot capability like Vmware? -
I know I should have tested this before starting something "production" in a vm, but I didn't really. If someone could verify my process should work, while I setup a new machine to test on, that would be appreciated (or if you have a "faster" way).
[note: VM is running and I don't want to shutdown to do a backup]
I have my btrfs cache drive and a vm installed at
`/mnt/cache/domains/UbunutServer/vdisk1.img`
so in the vdisk directory I run the command
> cp --reflink vdisk1.img vdisk1.bk.img
Appears to work just as the FAQ says. I then run:
> rsync --progress vdisk1.bk.img /mnt/user/BackupShare/userver-backup/
file appears to copy fine. Yay!??
I assume I can shutdown the VM and simply copy that file back from the backup share, rename to `vdisk1.img` and start up the VM and the VM will load back to the state i took the the `reflink` copy?
Thank you!
-
48 minutes ago, bastl said:
@marcusone1 Have a look into the the Netdata Docker. You can get the required infos you want for each docker or VM you're running. You can find it in the Community Applications.
holy smokes... that docker is crazy!
way more info that I need/was expecting. Fantastic. thank you.
-
1
-
-
I'm trying to find a plugin/setting/page that can show me per VM resource usage (ram/cpu/hd) similar to proxmox if possible?
Thanks!
-
I recently started running into the dredded "Stale file handle" error when accessing a share via NFS (which I do between linux machines so that rsync based backups that support file versioning work; like rdiff-backup. as they need to be able to do hard and sym links to work, so SMB is out.
What I've discovered:
Exporting a share that has a cache enabled, works well... until the mover moves the files. Then I start to get "Stale file handle" errors on the client side. For some reason it doesn't recover, and unmount/remount doesn't work from client to correct.
To correct the issue: on unRaid console do: `exportfs -ra`
Work Around:
Disable cache for NFS exported shares, or keep it only on cache, or an unassigned drive. i.e. don't move the files!
I put in the general support as I guess this isn't a "bug" per se... however, it would be good to have a solution; perhaps mover script can call exportfs?
-
On 12/11/2019 at 5:44 PM, jbrodriguez said:
Hi, given a folder it checks its children and allocated to other disks according to the available space. I guess you can say it's two levels deep.
It does inform which folders it won't copy, both in the "console" when PLAN completes and it sends an email with the results of the plan, if you set notifications in the settings
The "console" is flooded with all kinds of things, and doesn't show it "apparently", perhaps it did, but not in any noticeable way one would expect when an Error is encountered. Perhaps it can be highlighted or pop-out like it does for file permission errors are shown?
-
I am setting up a new system and moving drives, so thought it a great time to convert from reiserfs to XFS.
The issue:
I have a new unraid 6.7.2 running and working fine. with some new Red Pro drives 6TB, and 4TB to convert some 4-9year old 2TB Greens/Reds.
I start the array WITHOUT a parity drive (as I don't want to wait for the new 6TB to do parity until after I convert my drives).
when i do the rsync command like
`rsync -avPX /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk2/`
transfer speeds on large files drop to as low as 1MB/s (yes, 1 or sometime 800KB/s)... happens with even just one rsync going.
If i stop the array, remove all the drives from assigned drives, manually mount the drives, i get the expected 80-120MB/s of the old drive read speed.
I can even do two 2TB old 5400rpm drives to a new 7200rpm drive and each one gets about 80-100MB/s (as the new drive caps out at 240MB/s).
when manually mounted!
Why the slow transfer when the drives are in the array (WITHOUT a Parity drive). I tried the md_write_method to reconstruct write, but that didn't do anything
Thanks!
-
1 minute ago, trurl said:
Have you checked the log?
Yes, nothing to indicate why. Going through the folders that it synced, it skipped one for some reason. I would guess because it only went 2 deep, and at that depth the folder it skipped would not fit on a single drive (700G, none of my drives have 700G free) so it appears to have just quietly skipped that folder
-
30 minutes ago, trurl said:
Where exactly are you getting these numbers?
At the top of unBalance, where it says "Completed", "Speed", "Transfered", "Total".
"Total" shows 965GB, then on unraid main page, Disk1 (the disk i'm moving data off of via scatter), "USED" says 1.72TB.
-
Thanks for a great plugin... question however, I'm using it to scatter data from a drive I wish to remove. Using Copy mode just in case. It completes, but says 980G of data transferred, yet the drive usage says 1.7TB used... how accurate is the transferred data number, is there compression being used? Validating now to double check.
way more info that I need/was expecting. Fantastic. thank you.
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Transmission
in Docker Containers
Posted
Trying to install transmission, default settings, filled out the variables asked for, but when I start the docker I get in the logs
```
transmission-remote: (http://localhost:9091/transmission/rpc/) Couldn't connect to server
```
How do I fix this? I spent about an hour searching google/here to no avail so far. Thanks!