YourNightmar3
-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by YourNightmar3
-
-
Hey there,
Sorry if this is a basic question but i haven't been following the Unraid updates very closely lately so i don't know exactly what functionality is available and how it all works. For a couple years now i have been usingan 8TB disk with the unassigned devices plugin. The disk is mounted and i use Nextcloud to perform backups to it from an external Synology NAS.
Now the disk is getting full because the data on the Synology is growing. I'd like to add another disk and pool it together with the 8TB one, so let's say i add a 20TB disk, i want to have a pool of 28TB of backup space available, it should be completely seperate from my main array, and not use my cache drives either. And hopefully be accessible through Nextcloud so i can keep my current backup configuration working. It would be nice if the current backup data on the 8TB disk can be kept as well so i don't have to reupload all that.
Is this possible nowadays in Unraid? I know something with pooling was added but i'm not entirely up to date on what it is and how it works. Most of what i can find is about multiple cache pools, but that's not what i want??
Thanks.
-
1 hour ago, scolcipitato said:
You can't move folders when they are expanded, and you can't move the containers in the folder when the folder is expanded.
OH. Well that explains a lot. I have them on auto expand true because i don't really plan on ever using them collapsed, i just like the organization of folders/categories, but you're right now that i've collapsed the folders i can move them just fine. That wasn't clear to me, thank you.
-
9 hours ago, scolcipitato said:
The plugin only adds a class to the folder root element to make them sortable, if there are no error in the console I can't do anything, you can check if your folders have the sortable class.
They should have it, if not I suggest backing up all of your config and uninstalling and reinstalling.
None of my folders have the sortable class, but regular docker containers do:
-
11 minutes ago, scolcipitato said:
The plugin don't make changes to that, if you have any ad blocker disable them, than you can check the browser console for errors.
No errors in the console at all, and i disabled all adblockers and also tried on Edge where i've never had any adblockers installed, and still the same behavior. I can't grab the arrows on the folders :s
-
Hello,
I just installed this plugin and it looks very promising, i made a bunch of folders, but i cannot reorder them in my Docker list. When i click the padlock to unlock all items, the arrow does appear on the folders, but i cannot grab it, and my cursor also doesnt change when i hover over the little grabby arrow like it does on the regular docker containers, which i can reorder.
I tried on both Chrome and Firefox, both have this issue. Im on Unraiud 6.12.5. Am i doing something wrong? Is this a known issue?
-
So i have been dealing with what seems to be completely random crashes with my unraid server.
My server can be running for days, and then suddenly just drop out. Wednesday morning after the system crashed again i updated from unRAID 6.11.x to 6.12.5 and i immediately enabled the syslog to flash mirroring in the settings. Then this morning (two days later) i thought "Well it hasn't crashed since then and i did a big update, so there's a decent chance the problem is solved. I read having syslog to flashing enabled for too long is not recommended, so i'll disable it", and i did, and then just now it crashed again.
I have a PiKVM connected to the server and when the server crashes the PiKVM doesn't receive any video signal at all, but the fans are still spinning and the power LED on the server is on.
My server has a Gigabyte Z690M Aorus Elite AX DDR4 motherboard and an i5 12600K with 128GB DDR4 RAM. I read that the processor officially only supports DDR4 up to 3200mhz but mine was running at 3600mhz with XMP, i just turned that back to 3200mhz so maybe that will help.
I have now enabled syslog to flash mirroring again. Are there any other steps i can take to help diagnose the next time this happens? Here are my current server diagnostics in case it shows anything already, but again this is from after a reboot, because when it crashes i have no access at all to the server (no networking and no video signal): tower-diagnostics-20231201-1706.zip
-
1 hour ago, mickr777 said:
I found anything v3.0 is better at anime (but best to use a negative prompt [nude] as it can be a little nsfw)
anythingv-3.0: description: Anything V3 - a latent diffusion model for anime repo_id: Linaqruf/anything-v3.0 format: diffusers width: 512 height: 512Thanks, it works very good indeed! Do you know if this version of the container has a web API that you can call to generate images and get the result returned? Or if there is one like that? I've been looking for a selfhosted InvokeAI webapi like this for a little while to use in some hobby projects. I can't really find much information about it on Google.
-
23 hours ago, mickr777 said:
I haven't had that issue my self but I have the diffuser version of waifu diffusion running
you can try the diffuser version by manually adding this to your /userfiles/config/models.yaml, then on first switch to it in the webui it will download the required files
waifu-diffusion-v1.4: description: has been conditioned on high-quality anime images through fine-tuning repo_id: hakurei/waifu-diffusion format: diffusers width: 512 height: 512That works great, thank you! What exactly is the different between the diffuser version and the other version? I feel like my results with this are a little less good than the examples on their github.
-
13 hours ago, mickr777 said:
No problem, it can be called what ever you like anyway, as long as its the same in the xml
I got it working and it's great. I'm using an old GTX 970 with 4Gb VRAM and the image generation works fine. The inpainting gives an "out of vram" error fyi.
However i've been trying for hours to get the "Waifu Diffusion" model with the kl-f8-anime vae loaded but i can't seem to do it. It shows up in the WebUI and when i press "Load" it seems to do something, then it says "New model loaded" but it didn't actually load the Waifu Diffusion model. Also when i restart my container it says this in the logs:
>> Scanning Model: Waifu Diffusion >> Model scanned ok! >> Loading Waifu Diffusion from /userfiles/models/ldm/waifu-diffusion-v1-4/wd-v1-3-float32.ckpt | Forcing garbage collection prior to loading new model ** model Waifu Diffusion could not be loaded: LatentDiffusion.__init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'personalization_config'
I tried different versions and different vae files but i cannot get it to work. Do you know how i'd do this? I've had another Stable Difffusion container running before and i did manage to get Waifu Diffusion working, but that container broke completely that's why i set a new one up with your tutorial.
-
33 minutes ago, mickr777 said:
that normally happens if the docker image doesn't exist locally.
when making the docker image did you use this
docker build . -t invokeai_dockeras the name there needs to match the repo in the xml, as we are only making a local image not an online one
Ah thank you, i'm not very experienced with Docker and i must have changed the name when i executed the docker build command. It's working now.
-
Im getting this error after following the instructions, when creating the container with my XML file:
docker: Error response from daemon: pull access denied for invokeai_docker, repository does not exist or may require 'docker login': denied: requested access to the resource is denied.
Edit: in the docker template screen i changed the repo from "invokeai_docker" to "invokeai" and now it works. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that i had another "invokeai_docker" container previously.
-
Oh, this suddenly over-night solved itself. Containers are showing "up-to-date" and "Apply update" again.
-
Last night my ISP performed some kind of maintenance that gave me a new static IP address, and since then all of the Docker containers on my server are now showing "not available" at the "version" row. It looks like this:
I have already rebooted the server a couple times and also changed the DNS configs from my router's IP address to 1.0.0.2 and 1.1.1.2 because i read a thread on this forum that this solved the same issue for someone, but unfortunately for me that did not solve it.
Because i was doubting wether my server had proper internet access i did a 'wget google.com' command in the console and that does work fine:
Resolving google.com (google.com)... 2a00:1450:400e:80e::200e, 216.58.208.110 Connecting to google.com (google.com)|2a00:1450:400e:80e::200e|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.google.com/ [following] --2022-12-14 23:17:31-- http://www.google.com/ Resolving www.google.com (www.google.com)... 2a00:1450:400e:811::2004, 142.251.39.100 Connecting to www.google.com (www.google.com)|2a00:1450:400e:811::2004|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: unspecified [text/html] Saving to: ‘index.html’ index.html [ <=> ] 14.23K --.-KB/s in 0.02s 2022-12-14 23:17:33 (909 KB/s) - ‘index.html’ saved [14569]
I have attached diagnostics. Thank you very much in advance.
-
1 hour ago, dlandon said:
Do you have the latest version of UD installed? I recently made a change. Also check the log. It may show a message suggesting a reboot to finish removing the partition.
Ah you're right. It said this in the console:
QuoteDec 14 19:15:47 Tower unassigned.devices: Remove all partitions 'partprobe' result: Error: Partition(s) 1 on /dev/sdc have been written, but we have been unable to inform the kernel of the change, probably because it/they are in use. As a result, the old partition(s) will remain in use. You should reboot now before making further changes.
I rebooted the server, accessed the GUI and saw the partition was removed. However soon after that my entire server froze. The display out on my KVM was also frozen. I hard shutoff the server and rebooted again, and now it seems to be working without any issues. I managed to format and mount the unassigned SSD :). Not sure if that freeze was related to UD but i thought i'd mention it because it's definitely weird.
-
28 minutes ago, dlandon said:
Did you type 'Yes' with a cap 'Y'?
Yes i did, and then it shows the checkmark with text "Success", but nothing happens at all. Also nothing changed when i reload the page.
-
Hello! I recently replaced my single left over cache SSD for two new SSD's and i want to use the left over SSD with unassigned devices. However i cannot mount or format the SSD or anything like that:
When i press the red cross that says "clear disk" it wants me to type "yes" and after that, nothing changes. The SSD was previously BTRFS formatted. What do i have to do to format/mount the SSD?
-
Quote
It's a known btrfs issue with and odd number of devices in a pool.
Ah okay thank you
QuoteShould be but would prefer new diags.
I have attached new diagnostics.
-
1 hour ago, JorgeB said:
Balance was resumed and is still going at this moment, lets see if it finishes this time.
I ran this command earlier:
btrfs balance status /mnt/cache
And it said 9% left. I just ran it again and it says "No balance found" so i assume that means it's done? So i think i'll wait for the parity check to complete and then remove the old SSD from the cache pool.
Only thing i'm confused about: Why does my cache say "size: 1.5TB" with 3x1TB drives and the "used" and "free" numbers add up to 1.09TB? Is this normal?
-
8 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Post current diags.
Ok here it is tower-diagnostics-20221213-1147.zip
-
19 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Not ideal but wait a few more minutes and if still nothing it's the only option, I understand there's no local console access also?
Yeah no console access unfortunately. I have rebooted the server and a parity check has just started. I don't see anything about a BTRFS operation, how do i know if it ran successfully? I do see my cache pool with my two new drives and one old SSD, all three of those devices say "normal operation, device is active". But i'm also getting a "Warning - pool BTRFS too many profiles (You can ignore this warning when a pool balance operation is in progress)" message while there's no new BTRFS action starting at the moment, just the parity check.
How do i know if the previous BTRFS operation finished or not? Do i need to somehow start a balance operation manually (seeing this warning)? And do i need to wait for the parity check to finish first?
-
Hmm i just started the BTRFS action and now after about 30 minutes my server is entirely unreachable on the network. My KVM shows no video signal but the machine is still running. I assume a shutdown during the BTRFS action is unsafe? Or can do a hard shutdown wioth the power button and restart the server? I did watch it start and it was running for 10+ minutes.
-
47 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Yes, assuming the current one is using btrfs.
Yes it is, thanks a lot. Really couldnt find this specific situation by googling and i just needed a confirmation before doing it
-
13 hours ago, JorgeB said:
Try a different port/controller, it would be strange that it works on Windows and not in Unraid.
Something i noticed when i type the "lsblk" command in the terminal is that (if im reading this right) i get three 1TB drives as result:
root@Tower:~# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS loop0 7:0 0 116.8M 1 loop /lib/firmware loop1 7:1 0 19.4M 1 loop /lib/modules loop2 7:2 0 80G 0 loop /var/lib/docker/btrfs /var/lib/docker loop3 7:3 0 1G 0 loop /etc/libvirt sda 8:0 1 7.5G 0 disk └─sda1 8:1 1 7.5G 0 part /boot sdb 8:16 0 931.5G 0 disk └─sdb1 8:17 0 931.5G 0 part sdc 8:32 0 931.5G 0 disk └─sdc1 8:33 0 931.5G 0 part /mnt/cache sdd 8:48 0 931.5G 0 disk └─sdd1 8:49 0 931.5G 0 part sde 8:64 0 465.8G 0 disk └─sde1 8:65 0 465.8G 0 part sdf 8:80 0 3.6T 0 disk └─sdf1 8:81 0 3.6T 0 part sdg 8:96 0 3.6T 0 disk └─sdg1 8:97 0 3.6T 0 part sdh 8:112 0 7.3T 0 disk └─sdh1 8:113 0 7.3T 0 part /mnt/disks/VDK2E7KK sdi 8:128 0 7.3T 0 disk └─sdi1 8:129 0 7.3T 0 part sdj 8:144 0 7.3T 0 disk └─sdj1 8:145 0 7.3T 0 part md1 9:1 0 7.3T 0 md /mnt/disk1 md2 9:2 0 3.6T 0 md /mnt/disk2 md3 9:3 0 3.6T 0 md /mnt/disk3 md4 9:4 0 931.5G 0 md /mnt/disk4 md5 9:5 0 465.8G 0 md /mnt/disk5 sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom nvme0n1 259:0 0 931.5G 0 disk nvme1n1 259:1 0 931.5G 0 diskIs that correct? I see sbd, sdc, and sdd as 1TB drives.
sdd is a 1TB array drive. sdc is my working cache SSD that's left, and sdb doesn't show up anywhere in the unRAID main page. Could that be the other 1TB cache SSD? If so, why is it not showing up in the GUI? If not, then what is it?
I have attached my server's diagnostics (once again) in case this might help answer the question/solve the problem.
-
A couple days ago i made a post where it turns out there is something wrong with one of my cache SSD's:
I haven't fully figured out the problem yet but i purchased two new SSD's because i have been wanting to replace my cache drives for a while anyway. Then i'll figure out in the other thread why one of the two current SSD's isnt working.
My current situation: One working cache SSD and two new unassigned SSD's all connected to the server. How do i replace the one cache disk with the two new ones?
Can i add the two new SSD's to the cache pool, wait for the BTRFS action to complete, then remove the current cache SSD from the pool so i only have the two new ones left? I'd like to avoid transferring all cache data to my array if possible.
Thanks.
Want to add another disk for backups from external sources, can i pool them?
in General Support
Posted
I'm in luck, it is using btrfs. Is there a guide somewhere on how to do this by any chance?