plasmaball

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

plasmaball's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks for the quick reply. My Metadata and System was "single", rebalanced to RAID1 now. root@tower:~# btrfs scrub status /dev/sdb1 scrub status for f58a539b-5b41-4497-a98f-16eb6fbf48fc no stats available total bytes scrubbed: 0.00B with 0 errors root@tower:~# btrfs fi usage -T /mnt/cache Overall: ...<snipped>... Data Data Metadata System Id Path single RAID1 single single Unallocated root@tower:~# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 /mnt/cache Done, had to relocate 5 out of 870 chunks root@tower:~# btrfs fi usage -T /mnt/cache Overall: ...<snipped>... Data Data Metadata System Id Path single RAID1 RAID1 RAID1 Unallocated My corruption_errs count is unchanged unfortunately. root@tower:~# btrfs dev stats /mnt/cache [/dev/sdb1].write_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].read_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].flush_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].corruption_errs 67 [/dev/sdb1].generation_errs 0 I'll plan for re-creating the cache and see if that helps. Thanks again, I didn't even realize my Metadata and System weren't in RAID1. That could have been a catastrophe!
  2. Hello, I am on Unraid 6.6.7 with 4 SSDs in my cache pool. One of my devices has corruption_errs, and I would like advice on what I should do. Do I need to replace the drive? root@tower:~# btrfs dev stats /mnt/cache [/dev/sdb1].write_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].read_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].flush_io_errs 0 [/dev/sdb1].corruption_errs 67 [/dev/sdb1].generation_errs 0 [/dev/sdc1].write_io_errs 0 ... Some additional information about my cache pool: root@tower:~# btrfs fi show /mnt/cache Label: none uuid: f58a539b-5b41-4497-a98f-16eb6fbf48fc Total devices 4 FS bytes used 734.32GiB devid 1 size 476.94GiB used 197.02GiB path /dev/sdb1 devid 2 size 223.57GiB used 0.00B path /dev/sdc1 devid 3 size 953.87GiB used 673.00GiB path /dev/sde1 devid 4 size 953.87GiB used 673.03GiB path /dev/sdd1 root@tower:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/cache Data, RAID1: total=676.00GiB, used=671.49GiB Data, single: total=188.01GiB, used=61.84GiB System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=144.00KiB Metadata, single: total=3.01GiB, used=1012.19MiB GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B root@tower:~# btrfs fi usage /mnt/cache Overall: Device size: 2.55TiB Device allocated: 1.51TiB Device unallocated: 1.04TiB Device missing: 0.00B Used: 1.37TiB Free (estimated): 673.47GiB (min: 608.45GiB) Data ratio: 1.78 Metadata ratio: 1.00 Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B) Data,single: Size:188.01GiB, Used:61.84GiB /dev/sdb1 188.01GiB Data,RAID1: Size:676.00GiB, Used:671.49GiB /dev/sdb1 7.00GiB /dev/sdd1 673.00GiB /dev/sde1 672.00GiB Metadata,single: Size:3.01GiB, Used:1012.19MiB /dev/sdb1 2.01GiB /dev/sde1 1.00GiB System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:144.00KiB /dev/sdd1 32.00MiB Unallocated: /dev/sdb1 279.92GiB /dev/sdc1 223.57GiB /dev/sdd1 280.84GiB /dev/sde1 280.87GiB The reason I found this was from going through this post, which triggered me to run "btrfs dev stats" command. Here is a screenshot from the WebGUI. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
  3. What I like most: Runs from USB stick, making it VERY easy to backup and recover if something goes wrong. What I would like to see in 2020: More powerful VM editor. Current one overwrites custom XML edits.
  4. Hello, I'm pretty new to Unraid. I've been using it for 4 days and just purchased it. I am noticing a problem with SMB and wonder if others are encountering it. Specifically, if I do anything with users or shares it seems like the SMB service is fully restarted. This is causing my SMB clients to disconnect and get interrupted (e.g. I'm copying files to a SMB share). Most recently, I was just updating the photo on a user, and when I hit save my SMB transfers were interrupted and I had to restart them. Is it possible to change that behaviour, so that changes to users and shares trigger a "smbcontrol all reload-config" instead of a full restart? Thanks! Other than that, I'm really enjoying Unraid.