xrqp Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 When using Unraid docker and drives to grab and store torrent downloads, sometimes it makes my hard drive a little noisy. I am guessing it makes the heads move more but I am not sure. Are torrent downloads significantly harder on drives than transferring a single large file from a local drive to another local drive? "does ssd cache reduce wear problems overall" - here, "overall" means if we add an SSD, also consider its wear is added to the HDD wear. I am interested in opinions. My guess is it is not a significant difference overall, or too hard to know, so maybe do not give this factor much weight compared to other reasons for using SSD. Spaceinvader video had a very brief comment that if you have an SSD cache, then it is appropriate to use it for torrents and usenet downloads. But maybe it was not for reasons of wear? I don't know. For me, speed is not a factor as it may be for many. So I am on the fence if i should use SSD cache. Quote Link to comment
xrqp Posted February 7, 2021 Author Share Posted February 7, 2021 Today I see SpaceInvader One, in setting up nzbGet line for "ArticleCache" put 200MB, which uses RAM and reduces disk IOs. So, now I feel SSD cache is less important for disk wear. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.