Vilhjalmr Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 I have 2 servers running unraid that have 2x1GB and 2xSFP+ 10GB network connections. I do not have a 10GB switch, so am trying to have 1GB connection to my switch for internet and general network connectivity. Separately I am trying to setup direct connect on SFP+ between the 2 servers, on a separate IP, not part of the bond. Once setup, I can ping between the servers, can ping to my main netowrk, and can search community apps for plugins, but the additional docker hunb search doesnt work. And if I try to install a plugin, the download fails. plugin: downloading: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bergware/dynamix/master/unRAIDv6/dynamix.system.stats.plg ... failed (Network failure) plugin: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bergware/dynamix/master/unRAIDv6/dynamix.system.stats.plg download failure (Network failure) I am guessing it is trying to prioritize the 10gig connection over the 1gb, but I can't find where to adjust that. The reason for the 10GB connection between the servers is for faster backup between them. Any ideas would be welcome. Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 You need to use different subnets, e.g. use 192.168.0.x for 1Gb and 10.10.10.x for 10Gb, also leave the gateway blank for the 10Gb. Quote Link to comment
Vilhjalmr Posted May 16, 2022 Author Share Posted May 16, 2022 (edited) ok, eth0 is my 1gb, eth2 is the fiber. I have eth0 as dhcp, with router giving ip of 192.168.0.21, and gateway of 192.168.0.1 eth2 is static definition, 10.10.10.21, with no gateway. rebooted for good measure. Community apps fails to pull list at all. I can still connected the web ui on 192.168.0.21. Routing Table has Protocol Route Gateway Metric Delete IPv4 default 192.168.0.1 via br0 217 IPv4 10.10.10.0/24 eth2 1 IPv4 10.226.0.2 wg0 1 IPv4 10.226.0.3 wg0 1 IPv4 192.168.0.0/24 br0 217 wg0 is from my wireguard setup Edited May 16, 2022 by Vilhjalmr Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 Does the brigde only have eth0? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 16, 2022 Share Posted May 16, 2022 It should work, assuming there's internet on eth0, maybe I'm missing something, someone else might have an idea. Quote Link to comment
Vilhjalmr Posted May 16, 2022 Author Share Posted May 16, 2022 OK, I seem to have gotten it to work now, I think. At least, my main server can see the secondary over the fiber, and I can access the community apps again. What I did was edit /boot/config/network-rules.cfg. Originally it defined the 10gb ports first, followed by the 1gb, I just swapped their order in the file, then rebooted again. Seems to have worked. Will see if it holds. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.