Pre-Clear speed increases with less harddrives


Recommended Posts

I just recently bought a new 18 TB HDD to be added to my Unraid setup. As I had some older 4TB HDD laying around I added them as well. 

All new disks are connected using a PCI-E Sata card (BEYIMEI PCI-E X1 SATA - ASM1166+JMicron JMB5xx-Chip). 

 

During the pre-clearing of all drives in parallel Unraid reached roughly 70MB/s per drive. After the smaller drives have been pre-cleared the 18TB peaked at 270MB/s. I am now wondering where this difference of speed originates. Is this due to the age of the harddrives, the PCI-E controller, or is this just "normal"?

 

If the PCI-E controller is a bottleneck, it would be easy to replace. If the harddrives itself are the bottleneck - well so be it. Can someone help me understand the differences in speed?

 

Other hardware:

Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B550 AORUS PRO V2

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

 

1315618532_2022-06-2911_13_31-Tower_Main.thumb.png.aa430040adefe31470fba5bdcf9605d1.png340756693_2022-06-2912_56_38-Tower_Main.thumb.png.e33fc65775fe60de6924a0f01875f091.png

Link to comment

Thank you Jorge. I just realisied that the 18TB is not connected via the card, but directly to the MB. So it seems that the card itself is a bottleneck, although it should have enough wiggly room with 6GBs to easily max out all of the harddrives currently attached to it. As the 4TB and 3TB HDD are only spinning at5400 RPM, I think it might be a combination of not so young HDD´s and the need to move data across the bus from the motherboard to the card. 

 

Lets see how much of a day-to-day impact this will have. If the problem becomes a daily issue, I will likely switch the SATA controller card to one that has been recommended in the forums. If this happens, I will report back with my experiences. 

 

[0:0:0:0]    disk    SanDisk  Cruzer Fit       1.27  /dev/sda 
[1:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      ST18000NM000J-2T SN01  /dev/sdb 
[2:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      SanDisk SDSSDH3  20RL  /dev/sdc 
[3:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      ST18000NM000J-2T SN01  /dev/sdd 
[4:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      ST18000NM000J-2T SN01  /dev/sde 
[5:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      ST12000VN0008-2P SC61  /dev/sdf 
[6:0:0:0]    disk    ATA      ST12000VN0008-2P SC61  /dev/sdg 
[12:0:0:0]   disk    ATA      WDC WD40EFRX-68N 0A82  /dev/sdh 
[36:0:0:0]   disk    ATA      WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A80  /dev/sdi 
[37:0:0:0]   disk    ATA      WDC WD40EFRX-68N 0A82  /dev/sdj 

 

Link to comment

Yes, also note that the clear thread runs for all the disks at the same position, i.e., speed will be limited by the slowest disk at that point, screenshot appears to show the end sectors of the 4TB disks, since the 3TB dis already done, so 70/80MB/s at the inner sectors for those disks is normal, probably not the controller being the bottleneck in this case, still controllers with port multipliers are not recommended for performance and stability reasons.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.