October 28, 20223 yr Disc 3 in my array came up with a lot of read errors so I swapped out the disc and rebuilt the array only for the replacement disc to report read errors a few days later. Although the replacement was not a new disc, made me suspicious that it was not actually the disc. Would someone far cleverer than me take a look at the two smart logs for me and determine if it is the discs or a power issue? 😎 Earlier date smart is previous disc. TIA. HP ProLiant Gen 8 tower-smart-20220807-1021.zip tower-smart-20221028-1640.zip tower-diagnostics-20221028-1700.zip
October 28, 20223 yr Community Expert Syslog is completely spammed with smb related info, but SMART for both disks looks OK, so likely not a disk problem, check/replace cables or swap slots.
October 28, 20223 yr you can get errors on a disk that is considered out of parity if another disk is losing sectors basically you need to look at the SMART attributes on all the drives you have in the array including the parity drive and see if one of them is getting more REALLOCATED SECTORS. A lost sector on any drive during parity rebuild will fail the rebuild
October 28, 20223 yr Author None of the other discs report errors in the main window of the UI. Will try a bay swap. Thanks 👍
October 28, 20223 yr Your problem is with this disk === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Vendor: HITACHI Product: HUS723030ALS640 Revision: A440 Compliance: SPC-4 User Capacity: 3,000,592,982,016 bytes [3.00 TB] Logical block size: 512 bytes Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm Form Factor: 3.5 inches Logical Unit id: 0x5000cca03ec60450 Serial number: YVKHWZ3K Device type: disk Transport protocol: SAS (SPL-4) Local Time is: Fri Oct 28 17:01:36 2022 BST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled Temperature Warning: Enabled Read Cache is: Enabled Writeback Cache is: Enabled and the problem is here Protocol Specific port log page for SAS SSP relative target port id = 1 generation code = 3 number of phys = 1 phy identifier = 0 attached device type: SAS or SATA device attached reason: unknown reason: unknown negotiated logical link rate: phy enabled; 6 Gbps attached initiator port: ssp=1 stp=1 smp=1 attached target port: ssp=0 stp=0 smp=0 SAS address = 0x5000cca03ec60451 attached SAS address = 0x51402ec0002d2a34 attached phy identifier = 4 Invalid DWORD count = 1327 Running disparity error count = 1300 Loss of DWORD synchronization count = 35 Phy reset problem count = 0 relative target port id = 2 generation code = 3 number of phys = 1 phy identifier = 1 attached device type: no device attached attached reason: unknown reason: power on negotiated logical link rate: phy enabled; unknown attached initiator port: ssp=0 stp=0 smp=0 attached target port: ssp=0 stp=0 smp=0 SAS address = 0x5000cca03ec60452 attached SAS address = 0x0 attached phy identifier = 0 Invalid DWORD count = 0 Running disparity error count = 0 Loss of DWORD synchronization count = 0 Phy reset problem count = 0 This device doesn't give you back smart attributes because of the error above which looks like it is losing connection to the SAS card.
October 28, 20223 yr actually it looks like disks 1,2,3 are all showing this issue. Are those 3 disks connected differently than the others. Looking at the LSPCI log it looks like they are connected to the system via USB?
October 30, 20223 yr Author The three SAS drives are connected via a HP HBA card whereas the parity and cache via the onboard SATA controller.
October 30, 20223 yr Author On 10/28/2022 at 5:40 PM, bing281 said: This device doesn't give you back smart attributes because of the error above which looks like it is losing connection to the SAS card. Perhaps I should revert back to SATA drives and ditch the HBA?
November 15, 20223 yr Author After the latest UnRaid update the problem seems to have resolved itself. Still using the second drive but now no read errors at all. Two parity checks done since the update.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.