Posted September 27, 201113 yr Been using Unraid for well over a year and not noticed this before. Reboot/shutdown does not help. When using IE or Firefox to access the Webgui only a blank page will load. Using version 4.7, Windows 7 x64 Ultimate, IE 9 and/or Firefox 6.x URL is http://icarus/main.htm Appreciate your help. Syslog attached. Thanks - Meerkat Update: Google Chrome reports Error 324 (net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE): The server closed the connection without sending any data. syslog.txt
September 27, 201113 yr Author Try connecting to http://IP.address.of.server My network is setup as follows: # Generated settings: USE_DHCP=no IPADDR=10.0.0.69 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=10.0.0.1 HWADDR=00:1A:92:D3:EE:7B DHCP_KEEPRESOLV=no DNS_SERVER1=10.0.0.1 http://10.0.0.69 gives same result. What is interesting is this: root@Icarus:~# ping icarus PING Icarus (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.019 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.018 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.019 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.018 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.018 ms 64 bytes from Icarus (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.018 ms Shouldn't ping return 10.0.0.69? From Windows: C:\Users\user>ping icarus Pinging icarus [10.0.0.69] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.0.0.69: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 10.0.0.69: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 10.0.0.69: Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 2, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Thanks for the quick response. -Kat
September 27, 201113 yr I just ran into this exact same issue. I can get unmenu to load but not the normal unraid webgui.
September 27, 201113 yr Author Enter "ifconfig" Thanks! Results are: root@Icarus:~# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1a:92:d3:ee:07 inet addr:10.0.0.69 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:4964 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1446 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:775854 (757.6 KiB) TX bytes:377822 (368.9 KiB) Interrupt:26 Base address:0x4000 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:102 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:102 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:8568 (8.3 KiB) TX bytes:8568 (8.3 KiB) This is very odd mystery...nothing changed on my network in over a year and not had any issues. -Kat
September 27, 201113 yr is "emhttp" still running? (if not, it might have been killed if you are running low on memory) Type ps -ef | grep emhttp | grep -v grep to see if it is.
September 27, 201113 yr Author is "emhttp" still running? (if not, it might have been killed if you are running low on memory) Type ps -ef | grep emhttp | grep -v grep to see if it is. Here is the output. root@Icarus:~# ps -ef | grep emhttp | grep -v grep root 1462 1 0 18:16 ? 00:00:00 /usr/local/sbin/emhttp root@Icarus:~# Thanks for the quick response, Kim
September 27, 201113 yr Author I can't find any documentation on the network entry "BDHCP_KEEPRESOLV=no". I have not changed this entry but something I should investigate further? Thanks everyone for your input. -Kat
September 28, 201113 yr Author OK..found the culprit: ESET NOD32 5 antivirus software. When I disable the web scanning on port 80 I am able to load the Unraid GUI with no issues! I had just upgraded to NOD32 5.0 when this started and should have looked there sooner. NOD 32 5.0.93.0 on Windows 7 Ultimate X64. Solution was as follows: 1) Right Click on NOD32 icon on taskbar and select "Advanced Setup" 2) Expand "Web and Email". 3) Expand "Web access protect". 4) Highlight "HTTP, HTTPS" and uncheck "Enable HTTP Checking". 5) Click ok. Thank you everyone for your assistance -Kat
January 2, 201213 yr Got the same issue with Eset Smart Security 5. Thanks for pointing me to the solution. I just added the IP Adress of my server in the excluded IP adresses under the Protocol Filtering menu. This allows keeping Eset's protection except for the Unraid server.
August 9, 201212 yr Thanks, I had the same problem with Sophos Antivirus 10.0. Adding the IP address of the unRaid machine to the exclusions list solved the problem for me.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.