Rajahal Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 My Cat6 cables arrived today (one 10 foot and one 100 foot), and I installed them. My network now looks like: unRAID server ------Cat6 (100 ft)------ D-Link DIR655 ---------Cat6 (10 ft)-------- Desktop (Vista x64) The router connects to my cable modem (5 Mbit connection) with Cat5 cable, but I figured this wouldn't matter. So everything on the LAN is now GigE over Cat6 - optimal, right? I haven't done any extensive testing yet, but at first glance I do notice an improvement in the transfer speed from my desktop to my unRAID server (haven't tried the reverse yet). My speeds went up from ~14 Mb/s to ~18 Mb/s on disk shares, and stayed at ~14 Mb/s on user shares (so no change there). Not a staggering improvement, but improvement none-the-less. Why I'm really pleased is that initiating multiple transfers simultaneously doesn't cause all but one to drop into the Kb/s range. Instead, they all stay at an acceptable rate (maybe 8 - 14 Mb/s). This confuses me slightly, since I thought the PCI bus was the bottleneck preventing simultaneous transfers at acceptable speeds, but as long as it works, I won't worry about it. Everything I was transferring was to one drive, so perhaps if I started multiple transfers to multiple drives on the PCI bus I would see the extreme slowdowns I'm used to. So I didn't quite achieve the 30-40 Mb/s transfer speeds I was hoping for, but I'm not too concerned, at least its now fast enough to not bother me. Was it worth the $20 I spent on cables and shipping? Yes, especially since I now have the super long cable that will allow me to place my unRAID server in the backroom, basement, on the moon, you know, wherever I feel like. So in short, good advice guys, and thank you. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.