March 16, 20179 yr Hi, I just checked the syslog after re-doing my shares and adding the 'default' unRAID shares for my docker & libvirt images and despite the docker.img being stored on a BTRFS RAID1 pair of SSDs (cache pool) - the below syslog snippet shows that "SSD Detected: no" I'd assume that's because the .img itself isn't technically an SSD, it's a loop device... Is that the reason? Or is BTRFS / Docker.img just setup incorrectly by unRAID? fyi, it's causing no issues and I'm not concerned... I was just curious! Thanks! Mar 16 14:45:14 Raptor root: Creating new image file: /mnt/user/system/docker/docker.img size: 10G Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: btrfs-progs v4.7.2 Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information. Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Label: (null) Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: UUID: 27a7539a-adc2-42b0-8c7e-d59cc40f006a Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Node size: 16384 Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Sector size: 4096 Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Filesystem size: 10.00GiB Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Block group profiles: Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Data: single 8.00MiB Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Metadata: DUP 1.00GiB Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: System: DUP 8.00MiB Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: SSD detected: no Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Incompat features: extref, skinny-metadata Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Number of devices: 1 Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Devices: Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: ID SIZE PATH Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: 1 10.00GiB /mnt/cache/system/docker/docker.img Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor root: Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor kernel: BTRFS: device fsid 27a7539a-adc2-42b0-8c7e-d59cc40f006a devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop0 Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): has skinny extents Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): flagging fs with big metadata feature Mar 16 14:45:15 Raptor kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): creating UUID tree
March 16, 20179 yr Community Expert 46 minutes ago, nexusmaniac said: I'd assume that's because the .img itself isn't technically an SSD, it's a loop device... Is that the reason? Yes
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.