ethyr2000

Ok.. I'm dense.. and I clicked on it.. I double checked the list to make sure my username was in it.

I can't type ":thumbs_up\: " nor do I see emojis.. or do I have permission to.

I connected to discord, but I am not allowed to respond to any of the channels?? Not even the rules?

Just so there's a record. I rebooted in safe mode. Downgraded to 7.1.2. I'm currently going through checks on the system. As I had no data, this seems to have been fine.

tower-diagnostics-20250811-1848.zip I've included this in case it helps.

Should I reboot in safe mode .. will that stop the mover? Is it safe reboot with the mover active?

As my mover has been running on my system for days (and I have little to no data on it). It is preventing my stopping the array. Advice on how to proceed would be appreciated.

I thought containers didn't know about shares except what was defined through the container configuration. I'm a bit of a newbie.. so if I'm misunderstanding, please explain. Thanks.

I've been reviewing the configuration. Perhaps it would be nice to be able to designate gitea lfs to a share as this is for the "larger" files. As data seems be the directory that is able to be defined by the container manager, I am uncertain if lfs can be redirected to another share.

@Kilrah Thank you for the feedback. I had considered the daily backup option also . If I knew I was using it purely for code, that would be one thing. I'm considering it as a record of webpage development among other things - so the insertion of graphics and other elements are possible. While I don't consider the size to escalate too drastically, I don't want to underestimate either.

I am configuring Gitea on a new unraid server. Everything I have reviewed regarding containers recommends using faster storage/different drives for container data apart from the array except for explicitly labeled directories(e.g. /media for plex). My concern is I would like my git repositories to be on array storage, as I see the contents as long term. For Gitea's functionality, would fuse across cache to array be reasonable for the speed required? Has this been found to be a reasonable practice for Gitea? Thanks for the clarification.

oh.. And it's $90 for the board.. of course the adapters and drives are separate.

I stumbled on this - https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product%2Fproduct&product_id=294 I could imagine it with 1 m.2 adapter for a 10gb sfp+ port and m.2 sata adapters with 5 sata port each on the remaining 3 sockets. Primarily for backup.. but low power.

I have a 20 SAS drive array w/ 6gbps controller. I'd like to mix drives. And I've noticed dimmless SSD are cheap. I know the concern is writes and write speed. If I were to use this for movies (practically write once) and upload to cache to have the system place later. This home system will be idle most of the time. Will the slower rate of one drive in it's own pool affect the rest on the controller?

The system I'm building has an external sas controller and an internal sata controller. Since my data storage is going to be on the sas controller, which controller works best for the parity drives?