Back to the og question in the thread, before you start dismissing zfs as useless and not being the Unraid way consider this. I recently upgraded a config that is a simple NAS media server ( 3 identical hdds, one setup as parity) and cache with redundancy i.e. 2 nvms setup to mirror each other. The only slightly unusual feature of the system is 64gb of ram which is more than most but definitely just a nice to have and not a necessary feature. Moved the cache drives from btrfs to zfs which took some time but definitely not a hard process. The new setup does use RAM ( 1/8 of the total available so 8gb in this case) but what you gain from it is hard to believe. Nothing has changed in the hardware config of the system but the whole system is faster to respond and some workflows such as moving data from cache to the array are substantially faster (some cases are 6-7x faster). Keep in mind that none of the Unraid principles have changed and from a user pov this is the same system. You also gain a much better snapshot management but forget about that for a sec because that's changing user/admin behaviour. So if you really want to know why you should care about ZFS, the answer is speed. If you are stuck on 16gb of ram, it's definitely not for you. But if you can spare some RAM, you might as well consider moving at least your cache to zfs.