mproberts
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by mproberts
-
-
To add, thank you for the link (note: read the manual). So looks like I'll be going for third pass on high-water. And ignore the 80% warnings?
-
Yes, I believe...
-
Quick question - as my array fills I understand it fills one disk to a point, then the next disk, etc. As I near the first 80% warning, will the disk at/over 80% continue to fill - or will it stop at a percentage (90%) and start on the next disk?
IE, will I get an 80% warning on disk 1 below, then UnRaid will start using disk 2 until 80%, then disk 3? Trying to maximize my 7.5TB free but have a safe buffer.
-
I'm using a Dell T710 for Unraid 6.11.5. This has 8 internal slots for drives and I'm currently using two of those for the Cache drives. What are my options to move the Cache drives? I'd like to use all 8 slots for the array to expand my overall storage.
I am using a Dell H310 HBA card in IT Mode - with both channels used for the drive cages. I also have an unused eSata card installed.
Use the eSata card for an external enclosure to house the SSD drives (create a new pool, or use Unassigned Drives)?
Current Config:
- Dell T710 II - Two x5690 Xeon CPU’s (12 cores, 3.47 Ghz)
- 96GB DDR3 Mulit-bit ECC Ram
- Dual 1100 watt PS
- Nvidia Quadro P2000 video card for transcoding (love the T710 for this easy install as opposed to the R710)
- Dell H310 HBA card – IT Mode
- (6) Hitachi HUS726060AL5210 6TB SAS Drives (30TB Array)
- (2) Micron 5100 MTFD - Enterprise 980GB SSD Drives (Cache)
- Dell / Intel XYT17 / X520-DA2 10GB FH Network Adapter (2 ports) running as bonded, active-backup
Thoughts and advice much appreciated.
-
1 hour ago, KluthR said:
Could you mount this same target again with a dofferent name with no spaces in it? it should make no difference, but better safe than sorry.
That did it!
I'd thought of the spaces in the Windows directory earlier, but assumed since the OS (UnRaid & Krusader) saw it and worked to browse it was ok. Probably a best practice to follow anyway (no spaces) when mixing OS's.
Thank you!
-
root@Wilhelmina:~# df -a
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
rootfs 49391344 2174116 47217228 5% /
proc 0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys
tmpfs 32768 1192 31576 4% /run
/dev/sda1 15248800 965472 14283328 7% /boot
/dev/loop0 - - - - /lib/firmware
overlay 49391344 2174116 47217228 5% /lib/firmware
/dev/loop1 - - - - /lib/modules
overlay 49391344 2174116 47217228 5% /lib/modules
hugetlbfs 0 0 0 - /hugetlbfs
devtmpfs 8192 0 8192 0% /dev
devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts
tmpfs 49474148 0 49474148 0% /dev/shm
fusectl 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/fuse/connections
cgroup_root 8192 0 8192 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
cpuset 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset
cpu 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu
cpuacct 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuacct
blkio 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio
memory 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
devices 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/devices
freezer 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer
net_cls 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls
perf_event 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event
net_prio 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/net_prio
hugetlb 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb
pids 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/pids
tmpfs 131072 2240 128832 2% /var/log
cgroup 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/cgroup/elogind
rootfs 49391344 2174116 47217228 5% /mnt
tmpfs 1024 0 1024 0% /mnt/disks
tmpfs 1024 1024 0 100% /mnt/remotes
tmpfs 1024 0 1024 0% /mnt/addons
tmpfs 1024 0 1024 0% /mnt/rootshare
nfsd 0 0 0 - /proc/fs/nfs
nfsd 0 0 0 - /proc/fs/nfsd
/dev/md1 5858435620 4394856084 1463579536 76% /mnt/disk1
/dev/md2 5858435620 4394282504 1464153116 76% /mnt/disk2
/dev/md3 5858435620 4396368904 1462066716 76% /mnt/disk3
/dev/md4 5858435620 4395751364 1462684256 76% /mnt/disk4
/dev/md5 5858435620 3561133184 2297302436 61% /mnt/disk5
/dev/sdb1 1875382960 467431776 1406625568 25% /mnt/cache
shfs 29292178100 21142392040 8149786060 73% /mnt/user0
shfs 29292178100 21142392040 8149786060 73% /mnt/user
/dev/loop2 104857600 16292992 87988752 16% /var/lib/docker
/dev/loop2 104857600 16292992 87988752 16% /var/lib/docker/btrfs
/dev/loop3 1048576 4164 926140 1% /etc/libvirt
nsfs 0 0 0 - /run/docker/netns/default
//BACKUP/UnRaid OS Backup 37043960800 20978234480 16065726320 57% /mnt/remotes/BACKUP_UnRaid OS Backup
nsfs 0 0 0 - /run/docker/netns/bb81da434bbc
nsfs 0 0 0 - /run/docker/netns/65b742e4bef7
nsfs 0 0 0 - /run/docker/netns/6a03bf945432
nsfs 0 0 0 - /run/docker/netns/22334e7d40a0
root@Wilhelmina:~# -
Target directory from UnRaid below. I tried target configs with both:
/mnt/remotes/BACKUP_UnRaid OS Backup/
and
/mnt/remotes/BACKUP_UnRaid OS Backup/Appdata/
Aside from my flashbackup file and the .DS_Store file (from my Mac touching the directory), there are no other files in the target directory.
-
Trying to use CA Appdata 2.5 using /mnt/remotes for destination.
I am getting the error: CA_backup.tar: Cannot write: No space left on device.
My remote target is an SMB share properly set up and working (I can browse and write from Plex) and with 16tb free.
Any thoughts?
-
The Docker.Patch plugin fixed it! Thank you for taking the time.
-
Just recently, my TDARR docker updates are showing "unavailable". I read a couple of posts that mention checking DNS or running a script, but that seemed to be for those where no docker updates were working. This is only happening with TDARR. TDARR support said they are not aware of an issue.
Any thoughts or guidance?
-
21 hours ago, Diesel said:
Thanks for this.
This issue/solution also applies to the tdarr_node container.Fixed! Removing second node port from Server and the only/one node port from Node restored the containers!
-
Ok - that makes it clear. Thank you!
-
Thanks. Is it a virtual Raid 1 on a Raid 0 formatted/pooled set of drives? That's where my confusion lies and if this is some sort of virtual Raid 1, not clear how this would provide Raid 1 protection (1 drive failing).
If my two drives are wholly a Raid 0 pool, how do I end up with a (reported) Raid 1 for metadata and system?
-
Quick question - I recently replaced my two SAS drives with SSD for my Cache. As these are enterprise SSD, I went with Raid 0 (I know, still a risk). Two 960GB drives in Raid 0.
I followed the process for moving the original Cache data to the array, replacing the original drives with the new drives, configured for Raid 0 via the Balance pulldown, then kicked off the move back to Cache. All went and works fine.
Question: Why does the BTRFS filesystem for my Cache show Raid 1 for System and Metadata? I did run the Perform Full Balance after the data was moved back as well.
-
Got it - thank you. This helps.
-
I have a recently built Unraid server (see specs below) and want to make a change to the cache drives. I'd built the cache with two 2tb 7.2k SAS drives as a pool, which is entirely too slow... I'm also finding I don't really need 2tb of cache space. My primary use for this server is Plex and my 3CX phone system.
I'd like to replace the cache drives with two pooled 1TB SSD drives. Questions and possible issue I need clarity on;
- What is the preferred method to replace cache drives with smaller capacity replacements?
- The 8 drive slots on my T710 are all occupied - two 2TB SAS cache drives and six 6TB SAS drives (no room/slots/channels to add more SAS/SATA drives). Since the drives are pooled, I understand I could pull one and rebuild on a new drive, but can this be done on a smaller drive?
- If migrating/rebuilding to smaller drives is risky or overly complicated, I assume I can follow other documented processes to replace with (much more expensive) 2TB SSD drives one at a time?
Config:
- Unraid 6.9.2
- Dell T710 II w/ two x5690 CPU’s
- 96GB Ram
- Dual 1100 watt PS
- Nvidia Quadro P2000 video card for transcoding (love the T710 for this easy install as opposed to the R710)
- Dell H310 – IT Mode
- (6) Hitachi HUS726060AL5210 6TB SAS Drives
- (2) Hitachi HUS723020ALS640 2TB 6G SAS Drives (Cache)
- Dell / Intel XYT17 / X520-DA2 10GB FH Network Adapter (not configured)
- 4 network ports on T710 running as bonded, active-backup, 1gb
- Dedicated APC 1500va UPS
Thanks all!
-
Thank you.
Next question; when I have the sfp ports connected, what is the procedure to make active on Unraid? Then disable the copper interfaces? Eth0 is my primary interface currently with eth1, 2 and 3 as bonded (bond0) active-backup interfaces. Eth4 is my dual fiber Nic. While I can work in CLI, my concern is the order of the process so maybe I can do the changes from the web interface?
-
Obtain connectivity to the switch via eth4
- Use both fiber ports on card and switch ports?
- Validate connectivity (how?)
-
Disable the bonded interface?
- Or keep one as a failover?
Thanks again.
-
Obtain connectivity to the switch via eth4
-
Let me start my question with a basic 'will it work' scenario, then I expect to have more questions...
Running Unraid 6.9.2 on a Dell T710 with 4 gig interfaces bonded as active-backup. I also have a X520-DA2 10GB FH Network Adapter (2 ports) installed, currently in down state (fiber cables not connected yet). Primary usage is Plex.
I have a Unifi US-24-500W switch with two unused 10g sfp+ ports I believe are normally used as uplinks to other switches/infrastructure. Can I use these to connect from the Unraid server fiber interfaces to the switch sfp+ ports and serve all the other hosts on the switch? My goal is to have the two 10g links between the Unraid server and the Unifi switch serve all my clients - and potentially do away with my four Unraid 1g links. This is all on one private network at this point.
Thanks
Array Utilization Thresholds
in General Support
Posted
Understood. Thanks for the time!