Soiled.Tomato

So I've been trying to figure out what I believe should be a permission issue. I have 4 syncthing installs on various boxes (Unraid, 2x Windows, Synology). I can get Windows > Unraid to pair just fine as well as Windows > Synology. However, I cannot seem to get Unraid > Synology or vice versa. Both Unraid and Synology run linuxserver io Syncthing docker. The connection addresses on each of those, when left to dynamic show several relay addresses and my public facing ip. At no point can I get them to see the other syncthing instance's machine ip. I thought maybe the Unraid host was being firewalled or something in that nature but a ping check from the host to the other machines and WAN shows everything is working normally. I've dug through the docker documentation as at one point I believed it to be related to the networking setting within each docker image, but that seems to have turned out being incorrect. A different forum resource along with the syncthing github made it seem like there could have possibly been a bug in the 1.18.x version of syncthing but i don't know much more than that atm. EDIT: I forgot to add that when I connect from either Unraid/Synology with Windows I can see their static IP. I'm not entirely sure what IP I see from windows to Unraid but I believe that sees a relay. Will double check since it seems important to be sure of. EDIT2: In the docker tab under the configured port access mappings, which cannot be changed in the image config settings, these address mappings show up: 172.17.0.5:21027/UDP10.130.1.243:21027 172.17.0.5:22000/TCP10.130.1.243:22000 172.17.0.5:22000/UDP10.130.1.243:22000 These seem to look very similar to the addresses syncthing is using in one of my other screenshots with a 172.17.x.x address. I’ve thought about adding these addresses as virtual IP’s to the firewall but have no real reason to believe they are even coming up on its end. EDIT3: Issue resolved. Adding in firewall rules to the Unraid and Synology boxes to the NIC of the firewall allowed them to communicate. Something seems off there tho as I do not have any static routes that would route traffic in traffic this way. I’m inclined to believe the possible bug issue from the other forum resource i mentioned is the cause. SyncTrayzor seems to be wrapped around a previous syncthing build that didn’t map traffic in this manner but I cannot be certain as I do not recall a syncthing version mentioned in there before.

Hi, I seem to be having an issue getting the GUI to load up. After the prompt asking for safe, GUI, or non GUI modes I get a series of scripts come up before just going black. My network sees the hostname for about 10 minutes then it seems to disappear. It never seems to stop responding as a CTRL ALT DEL will reboot the machine with message prompts signaling shutdown requests to other hardware/services. The hardware in question is a single RJ45 port Broadcom BCM5751 network card. According to the Wiki that card should work just fine. Adding a link to the card in question just in case it's of any use to anyone. 1.25G Gigabit Ethernet Converged Network Card (NIC), with Broadcom BCM5751 chip, Single RJ45 Ports Several other reviewers/Q&A users mention the card working with unraid and similar OS's. The oddest thing is that if I remove the card from the system I can load up the GUI just fine. The machine in question uses an ASRock B460M-HDV board, Crucial 4 GB DDR4-2666 ram, a 4 port Marvell 9215 Non-Raid Ziyituod PCIe SATA Card, a few WD Red/White labels, and some extra WD blues I had no other use for. None of that hardware has actually changed in any way except for the network card. I tried updating the BIOS to the latest ASRock update and a lspci does list the network card as a connected device. I have another NAS box where I migrated this system from in a old Dell Optiplex 745 SFF. The BIOS version notes a 2007 year. I've swapped this card into that and GUI loads up just fine. Could there be a hardware limitation in Unraid that isn't allowing the ASRock B460M and the Broadcom BCM5751 network card?