-
Posts
73 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Everything posted by taflix
-
Results Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... - block cache size set to 462432 entries Phase 2 - using internal log - zero log... zero_log: head block 38823 tail block 38823 - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... ir_freecount/free mismatch, inode chunk 0/128, freecount 7 nfree 1 finobt ir_freecount/free mismatch, inode chunk 0/108071680, freecount 5 nfree 3 agi_freecount 19, counted 11 in ag 0 agi_freecount 19, counted 7 in ag 0 finobt agi unlinked bucket 3 is 131 in ag 0 (inode=131) agi unlinked bucket 26 is 128617114 in ag 0 (inode=128617114) sb_ifree 368, counted 376 - found root inode chunk Phase 3 - for each AG... - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists... - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... - agno = 0 bad inode format in inode 131 bad inode format in inode 131 would have cleared inode 131 imap claims in-use inode 108073626 is free, correcting imap - agno = 1 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - agno = 8 - agno = 9 - agno = 10 - agno = 11 - agno = 12 - process newly discovered inodes... Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... - setting up duplicate extent list... - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... - agno = 0 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 2 - agno = 6 entry "Movies" in shortform directory 128 references free inode 131 - agno = 7 would have junked entry "Movies" in directory inode 128 - agno = 1 bad inode format in inode 131 would have cleared inode 131 - agno = 8 - agno = 9 - agno = 10 - agno = 11 - agno = 12 No modify flag set, skipping phase 5 Inode allocation btrees are too corrupted, skipping phases 6 and 7 No modify flag set, skipping filesystem flush and exiting. XFS_REPAIR Summary Sat Aug 13 08:27:40 2022 Phase Start End Duration Phase 1: 08/13 08:27:38 08/13 08:27:38 Phase 2: 08/13 08:27:38 08/13 08:27:39 1 second Phase 3: 08/13 08:27:39 08/13 08:27:40 1 second Phase 4: 08/13 08:27:40 08/13 08:27:40 Phase 5: Skipped Phase 6: Skipped Phase 7: Skipped Total run time: 2 seconds What do you think?
-
Hi, I just completed the extended test for Disk 2, it said: Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 1752 - I'm assuming the full details will be in the diags? Attached a fresh copy. taflix-unraid-diagnostics-20220810-0835.zip I'm leaning towards this being data / power cable issue? I ordered some new cables and they should be delivered by this weekend. I already got new cables the first time, but I guess with most Amazon stuff, quality control is hit or miss.
-
I still have the original disk. In the other thread, it was giving me read errors. The advice was to just remove it from the array and have UNRAID rebuild it. That process was successful. Then, recently, it started showing disk read errors again. I tried the same solution but it wouldn't rebuild without stopping due to read errors. So, that's when I purchased a new disk.
-
Disk 4 is a new disk. Does it have to be precleared before adding to the array? Does it have to be formatted? I'm getting this message while Disk 4 is being rebuilt? "Unmountable: Wrong or no file system" fresh daigs attached taflix-unraid-diagnostics-20220807-1424.zip I unplugged and reseated all data and power cables. Looked like it was running well for about 30 seconds but Disk 2 is still getting errors? Should I allow the rebuild process to continue or stop? I'll pause it for now.
-
New drive disabled in new array, what should I should?
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
Thanks sir! It is showing this: I'm not familiar with the concept of "emulated"? And those instructions are much better! The disk is now being reconstructed: -
New drive disabled in new array, what should I should?
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
Thank you. I've never rebuilt before. Is this the process? https://wiki.unraid.net/Replacing_a_Data_Drive Since the drive is fine and I'm not replacing the drive, what would the process be? -
New drive disabled in new array, what should I should?
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
The extended test shows: Completed without error The results are attached. Whenever you get around to this, let me know what we should do next? Thanks! taflix-unraid-smart-20220704-0859.zip -
New drive disabled in new array, what should I should?
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
Okay, the READ CHECK was 25.7% done when I stopped it and it showed no errors. I started the extended self test, it probabl won't be done until tomorrow. It's at 50% since I started it 10 hrs ago. Happy 4th of July! 🧨 -
New drive disabled in new array, what should I should?
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
-
Diagnostics attached. I have a new array of 14 TB drives. One of them was disabled a few hours ago. What should I do? The short self test said: Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 840 - taflix-unraid-diagnostics-20220702-2253.zip
-
[6.10.3] Warning: Share xxx references non existent cache pool yyy
taflix replied to taflix's topic in General Support
Thanks, but I figured it out. I added SSD drives as cache pools. Upon initializing the drives, the default file system is XFS. However, after poking about in the forums, reddit, and other sites... many suggested that BTRFS is better for SSD cache pools. I changed the file system but didn't reformat the drives. The common errors plugin could probably be tweaked to take into consideration this scenario. I'll leave the solution here for future googlers to find.