DanielPT
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by DanielPT
-
-
20 hours ago, JorgeB said:
Pool appears to be raid1, post the diagnostics.
Hi JorgeB
Thanks for the reply
I have attached the logs
-
12 minutes ago, itimpi said:
The suggested process will not work - you cannot remove a device from a pool in Single mode without data loss.
You need to have the pool in RAID1 mode before you can remove a drive without data loss.
Okay
How can i then do it?
The data is not important But i want to have the cache drive looking like before so my dockers dont get confused?
Thanks!
-
-
7 hours ago, Bastian said:
The IP label can stay as it is. The label is only used by unraid for the Web UI Link in the Docker Tab. [IP] gets translated to the servers IP and the port gets translated to the external port from the mapping. It has no functionality for the container whatsoever.
The docker run command compromises of docker run [options] image [command] [args]. command and args have to be in that order and command can't be omitted if you want to pass args. That is exactly what you are doing. You are passing the argument --with-database directly after the image, so it is a command. Since there is no executable called --with-database within the container, it fails.
The maintainer already thought of that, as you can see in the template docker-compose file. Just fill the variable ADDITIONAL_PARAMETER with the parameters you want to set and remove them from the post arguments.
Edit: The links on docker run aren't meant to be there, the forum auto. adds them oO
Wow!
After i remove it from "post arguemnts" and put it in "additional parameters it worked!
And i had to edit the permissions on the database
But meny thanks!
Another question i have.
I have made a "config" path in my appdata folder. But it dosent seem to store anything?
Is it all in the database?
Thanks!
-
-
Hi all
I have tryed really hard to get this running. Im running out of ideas.
Hopefully somebody got the same problem on github.
https://github.com/tillsteinbach/VWsFriend/discussions/654#discussioncomment-10436066
But i have just ued the "Dockerhub" to get the containers.
How can i "do" what she says fixed it for hear?
Meny thanks!
Regards Daniel
-
Im also!
Just tryed to install it from dockerhub but cant get it to work properply.
-
On 6/28/2024 at 6:29 AM, MAM59 said:
Yes it is.
And your planned usage is also the only legal one for the "active backup" type.
But it only makes sense if you connect the two lines to two different switches too because it is more likely that a switch fails as the dog eats up the fiber cable.
So usually it does not help much, it even may cover an overseen error before somebody notices that things are running much slower as before.
I did not see your post before, sorry.
My guess is that you need to wait a little longer. Active Backup uses the MACs of the real cards, so if you change interfaces, ARP caches on the other devices become invalid and need to time out before the change can be recognized. This can take up to an hour. Be patient 🙂
(and yeah, this annoying feature renders the idea of active backups rather useless. It cannot be done without losing connection for a period of time)
Also all running connections are cut off too by the switch. So there will be many complains and so on. There is no smooth transition.
HI MAM.
Meny thanks for the time and good answer !
My server is connectet to my UDM SE with 10G.
And i have 2 1G ethernet connectet to my 24p switch.
So if the fiber card in the server blows up or fiber cable is broken. I like the idea that a backup line can be configured.
Meaby i can get my Unify UDM to send me a notification if the 10G has gone down.
But too bad that it cant be done with "almost" no down time
-
On 10/2/2023 at 8:23 PM, MAM59 said:
Yep, like I told above already
Bond0 is the only one that should exist. With the members eth0 AND eth1
Hi @MAM59 You sound like you know what you are doing
Im into kind of the same place. I like to make a 10G SFP and a "Acitve-backup" with 1G. Is that even possible?
So if my fiber is broken (10G) it will switch over to the 1G cable
-
Nobody knows how to get this working?
-
Or should i move all ip config to eth2 ?
-
I just inserted a PCIe card for 10G sfp.
It is linking fine and working.
But i like the "active-backup" solutoin so if the fiber (10G) is down it switch to the 1G port.
I have switched around the mac adresses so the "eth0" mac is on my 10G card. I looks like this:
But when i deisable the 10G link
I dosent failover to the 1G port. What am i doing wroung?
Meny thanks!
-
Hi all
Just saw that a tracker says my connection is "closed"
SOOO long ago i messed around with the wg0 config.
I use OVPN.
Just tryed crating a new port and config but then i get
Warning: `/config/wireguard/wg0.conf' is world accessible
Is that a bad thing?
Somebody have the "guide" how to portforward in OVPN?
Thanks!
-
Hi all
Just saw this AWESOME project. Is it possible "someone" could make a container for this?
Could be so cool!
Regards Daniel
-
14 hours ago, Squid said:
Its from Unassigned Devices. Since you're already up to date on it, reboot and if it happens again post in the UD support thread
Thank you very mutch! I tryed a reboot now it is gone
Good day to you!
-
-
Im so confused about this
Si right now you dont update the repo with the lastes version? Only if we have the mini parametre?
Sorry that i dont understand this
-
On 2/10/2024 at 9:10 PM, Revan335 said:
The Version Parameter works only with mini.
https://hub.docker.com/r/saspus/duplicacy-web -> Environment variables
Clarify for mini on the Docker Site and here https://forum.duplicacy.com/t/how-to-use-recent-duplicacy-web-release-in-a-docker-container/8443/
Okay just so im sure. I wont get the latest version of duplicacy if i do not add the "mini" parameter?
-
3 minutes ago, Kilrah said:
Where are you restoring? Should not be on the external backup drive...
Im trying to restore to a share called "Restore"
-
3 hours ago, Revan335 said:
I would say yes. Its that true can only say the Developer.
You would set mini tag too. saspus/duplicacy-web:mini
"Than we are waiting for the published of 1.8.0 over the latest Version from duplicacy.com URL. https://duplicacy.com/latest_web_version for all."
Oh sorry i dont quit understand this? What is web:mini? Is it no the full version like i run today? Why does it not just update with
saspus/duplicacy-web ?
-
7 hours ago, Kilrah said:
Your backup is in archives, right? If so the user/perms of the backed up files are stored in the archive and the drive perms don't matter.
Yea they are
But when i restore with duplicacy it tryes to restore the owner
Thats why i will like it to just be "nobody"
-
49 minutes ago, Revan335 said:
Yes, that's the CLI Version.https://forum.duplicacy.com/t/duplicacy-cli-3-2-3-release/8019/1
The 1.8.0 is the Web/GUI Version.
Okay so
I make an envoriment variable with
DUPLICACY_WEB_VERSION
And set it to 1.8.0
Is that stable version? 😊
-
1 hour ago, Kilrah said:
No. That shouldn't be a problem for anything though.
It is becurse my app data backup is going to that drive. And that is a problem when i restore that it is with root. I will like to do it with nobody 😊
-
13 hours ago, Revan335 said:
Duplicacy have Version 1.8 released, can you update your Version?
https://forum.duplicacy.com/t/duplicacy-web-edition-1-8-0-releases/8419
Am i looking the wroung place? Just did a "Check for updates" But no updates?
Change disk pool from 2 to 1?
in General Support
Posted
Wow so i dont loose data ?