bnevets27

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    576

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by bnevets27

    [Support] Linuxserver.io - Medusa

    in Docker Containers

    Posted

    I'm guessing you have used sonarr or radarr.... That feature is in those programs, it's not possible in Medusa unfortunately. They do plan on a heavy redo of quality settings which is going to be really powerful but no idea when it will happen, I'm sure not soon.

     

     

    You could use prefered words, undesirable words, ignored or required words if there is a specific group or any thing in the title that you can try to single out and filter out the larger files.

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1

    [Plug-In] Community Applications

    in Plugin Support

    Posted · Edited by bnevets27

    26 minutes ago, Squid said:

    The issue with preclear is that it doesn't install under 6.4.1 at all (which means that there was no way you could uninstall it by the way) and as a result leaves behind code that may or may not work.   It's only marked incompatible with 6.4.1+.  It's mainly because of the excess code that may or may not cause issues due to the family install that I've marked it as such because for whatever reason preclear inserts itself into every page present on unRaid, including CA. (Technically, even with a working preclear plugin installed it actually does interfere with the displays of CA and things don't look exactly how I designed them to be.)

     

    Most times I give the authors time before marking things incompatible to fix things up.   However advanced buttons when it runs orphans every container.  That needed to be marked ASAP so that FCP could at least warn users.  Preclear you actually don't have the option to keep installed because unRaid itself will force you to reinstall it anyways(since it's a failed install at boot) so basically the incompatible flag is moot anyways.

     

    Thanks squid for the explanation. The feature request was just something that I've come across before. Plugins for whatever reason do not play nice and get marked as incompatible or need to be uninstalled. It doesn't happen a lot and I know you allow time for developers to get it fixed before having to make that change in CA. Its not a big deal just a small suggestion. if it is a bunch of work or you see no value in it, that's fine, this is your baby after all. No reason I can't keep checking if compatibility is restored. It really is a "I'm too lazy to check or remember, so could you tell me or do it for me"  type of request. Though I'm sure I have probably uninstalled at least a couple and completely forgot about them. I don't reside to the fact that just because I forgot about them I wouldn't use them though. I don't know about anyone else but I have a decently long list of plugins and dockers I use and that list generally isn't getting smaller.

    [Plug-In] Community Applications

    in Plugin Support

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Squid said:


     

     


    Not possible with the plugin manager. Preclear since it errors on installation won't attempt a reinstall again during the next boot.

    Advanced buttons will install ok but if you ever update a container with it you will lose the app and have to reinstall.

     

    That's why I prefer to not uninstall plugins that break, that why when I finally see they have an update or that they have been updated it usually means they have been fixed which I then usually confirm by reading the change log.

     

    But since Advanced button causes such a problem I didn't want to risk accidentally using it. Preclear I wasn't sure what issues it may have caused but uninstalled it to be safe. 

     

    Others if they just break functionality of the plugin itself and its likely they will get fixed I see no reason to uninstall them. 

     

    Would it be possible to just have a "simple" notification sent if the plugin gets updated or becomes compatible, checkbox type idea?

     

     

    24 minutes ago, trurl said:

    If you can't remember it do you really miss it?

    Didn't really expect that from a feature request. In this example, next time I want to preclear a disk I'll look to see if its compatible again. But with advanced buttons anytime I see updates (as I have auto turned off for a few reasons) I will miss it. Which means of course I could check everyday I do updates but again this was a simple feature request. Not saying it necessary by any means but the idea is to improve user experience, or so I thought. 

    [Plug-In] Community Applications

    in Plugin Support

    Posted

    I've had this thought before but it was never a big deal. But with things like Advanced Buttons and Pre-clear now not working with 6.4 and needing to be uninstalled until they are updated.  It would be nice to have a way to disable them but have them update when they get marked as being compatible again. Rather then having to remember to go and keep checking if its been updated and now compatible so it can be re-installed.

    Let's complain about the LT release process

    in Prerelease Support [DEPRECATED]

    Posted

    On 12/14/2017 at 5:09 PM, Squid said:

    My opinion is yes.  (Although I use AMD (not Ryzen / Threadripper) )

     

    Huge improvements in the GUI (as far as stability is concerned, its no longer single threaded, so if it gets tied up with something or crashes on you, with 6.3 you'd have no UI.  6.4 just open a new tab)

    And, any little bug / issue that may have been affecting 6.3.5 the only fixes are for going forward.  IE: 6.4+  back porting them pretty much just isn't going to happen.

     

    The new features, (SSL access and encyption) I haven't touched though.  No real need for them.  But its all up to you.

     

    Thanks for this Squid. I was avoiding running anything other then stable but all the points you made, make sense. I ran one of the betas back in the day (can't remember which) as it was stable and had some major improvements. At that time I waited for it to have been mature enough and it looks like this time around 6.4 is mature enough also. I'm also not going to use some of the new feature yet. Partly due to not needing them and partly due to them being, well, new. The web gui running on ngix was the major improvement I was looking forward to.

    Pass through GPU to Docker

    in Docker Engine

    Posted

    As far is plex support. I read in the gpu transcoding thread on the plex forum that a user reported to have it working with a R9 280 which is basically the same card. They don't mention what platform they were on though.

     

    As far is getting the drivers installed myself. Does that mean I would have to compile the kernel?

     

    Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

     

     

     

     

    Pass through GPU to Docker

    in Docker Engine

    Posted

    I read the thread for passing an igpu through to plex. But no I don't have an igpu.

    I do have an ATI HD 7970. Being able to offload some of the work from the CPU would be very helpful in my sadly not so up to date system.

    Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk