bombz
-
Posts
613 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by bombz
-
-
I saw update assistant report 6.12.10 when I was on 6.12.8
When updating the OS, the OS went to 6.12.9
once rebooted 6.12.10 was available, must be a staged update as I didn't see 6.12.10 posted on the releases page hereThanks for this thread, and the community feedback.
-
would be awesome if unraid docker section implemented a link to the change logs for dockers... perhaps some day
https://github.com/KDE/krusader/blob/master/ChangeLog
I assume this is the most recent changelog ? -
Hello,
Appreciate this post/patch. After every OS update I run through my logs on both servers, Saw this earmarked in the log:
root: Fix Common Problems: Warning: Docker Patch Not InstalledWhich led me here to investigate further.
Thank you devs, members, and everyone involved in the UnRaid community!
-
2 minutes ago, dlandon said:
Just under the serial is a blue field. That is the moumt point. They are both the same. Change one by clicking on it when it's unmounted
Hello,
Ahh now I see what you mean. My apologies I have never had to perform a name change to the UD mount point. Seems both disks are now successfully mounted.
Thank you again for your prompt feedback and assistance, much appreciated!
-
3 minutes ago, dlandon said:
Click on the mount point and change it. UD can't mount two disks at the same mount point.
Hello,
Thank you for the quick reply. I am not sure what you mean?
Here are the 2 disk, if I try to mount (sdh) I receive the following prompt as stated above
But if I mount (sdi) the mount is successful and (sdh) changes to 'reboot'
would you mind clarifying?
Thank you.
-
Hello,
Attempting to mount a device with UD and unsure as if why it won't mount. It is a disk I pulled from the array formatted as XFS and the plan is to preclear it.
I am running into the following error
Jan 20 14:13:27 unassigned.devices: Error: Device '/dev/sdh1' mount point 'WDC_WD40_EFRX' - name is reserved, used in the array or a pool, or by an unassigned device. Jan 20 14:13:27 unassigned.devices: Disk with serial 'WDC_WD40_EFRX_ATMM221U3000000001-0:0', mountpoint 'WDC_WD40_EFRX' cannot be mounted.I was able to mount other disk, however this one is not allowing to mount.
Any ideas? -
14 hours ago, trurl said:
Looks like this is the cause. Since you are on the latest version now, reboot and see if it happens again.
10-4 seems better now, had to pick an off-peek time to reboot, was considering performing a reboot sooner, and thought to add some info for the community, just incase :-)
seems better now...0 /var/log/pwfail 8.0K /var/log/unraid-api 0 /var/log/preclear 0 /var/log/swtpm/libvirt/qemu 0 /var/log/swtpm/libvirt 0 /var/log/swtpm 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_winreg 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_classic 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_lsad 0 /var/log/samba/cores/samba-dcerpcd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/winbindd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/nmbd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/smbd 0 /var/log/samba/cores 36K /var/log/samba 0 /var/log/plugins 0 /var/log/pkgtools/removed_uninstall_scripts 4.0K /var/log/pkgtools/removed_scripts 4.0K /var/log/pkgtools/removed_packages 8.0K /var/log/pkgtools 4.0K /var/log/nginx 0 /var/log/nfsd 0 /var/log/libvirt/qemu 0 /var/log/libvirt/ch 0 /var/log/libvirt 428K /var/logThank you again for your assistance!
-
9 hours ago, trurl said:
The logs in your diagnostics are not large.
What do you get from command line with this?
du -h /var/log
Hello,
Here is the output of the command:
0 /var/log/pwfail 127M /var/log/unraid-api 0 /var/log/preclear 0 /var/log/swtpm/libvirt/qemu 0 /var/log/swtpm/libvirt 0 /var/log/swtpm 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_winreg 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_classic 0 /var/log/samba/cores/rpcd_lsad 0 /var/log/samba/cores/samba-dcerpcd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/winbindd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/nmbd 0 /var/log/samba/cores/smbd 0 /var/log/samba/cores 1.1M /var/log/samba 0 /var/log/plugins 0 /var/log/pkgtools/removed_uninstall_scripts 4.0K /var/log/pkgtools/removed_scripts 12K /var/log/pkgtools/removed_packages 16K /var/log/pkgtools 8.0K /var/log/nginx 0 /var/log/nfsd 0 /var/log/libvirt/qemu 0 /var/log/libvirt/ch 0 /var/log/libvirt 128M /var/log
Appreciate your feedback, hope it helps with a resolution.Thank you.
-
3 hours ago, itimpi said:
Have you made sure you are up-to-date with the ‘connect’ plugin (if you are using it) as the last release was meant to clear an excessive logging issue.
Hello,
I previously installed all plugins (today) before I saw this concern happen.... 'connect' was one of them.
Saw in the 'connect' release notes before pushing the plugin update, that there were changes to 'connect' due to community feedback.Once updated, I noted the system log went to 100%
-
On 5/18/2023 at 8:41 AM, Squid said:
syslog.1 is the rotated syslog (after syslog reaches "x" size, a new syslog is started and the old one gets labelled as syslog.1 (.2 .3 etc)
To clear you have to reboot, but ultimately there is something being logged excessively indicating some sort of issue and posting your diagnostics would help
Hello,
I seem to also be having a concern with the GUI system log showing 100%
I have been attempting to figure out where the concern may be. I have posted diagnostics to assist.
Thank you. -
Saw this concern random docker containers are showing 'not available' when attempting to update today....after updating to the latest CA
Currently running v6.12.4
Is there a workaround for this concern, or perhaps has been patched in the latest OS 6.12.6?
-
On 1/14/2023 at 4:21 PM, -C- said:
If you compare your i9 with a couple of 13th gen CPUs, you'll see how far things have developed:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/3334vs5008vs5156/Intel-i9-9900K-vs-Intel-i5-13600K-vs-Intel-i3-13100F
The only 13th gen i3 on that site is the 13100F, which doesn't have an iGPU (you'll want an iGPU for Plex transcoding). but that'll give you an idea of the sort of performance you can expect.
I recently upgraded from a Thinkserver with an old Xeon to a 13th gen i5 (13600k) and although its Max TDP is higher, I'm getting better energy efficiency with my new build with general usage, maybe due to the efficiency cores. I have yet to do much in the way of power optimisation, so I'm hoping I can get further reductions.
I went for an ASRock Z790 RS Pro board with 32GB of DDR5 as I plan on holding on to this for a good few years and figured I'd get the latest stuff now so I have better upgrade options in the future or it'll be suitable for a gaming PC build. I looked into getting a Z690 and DDR4, but there really wasn't much difference in cost so I decided to go with the newest kit.I also have a pair of 1TB 770s as I got them for a good price during the recent Black Friday sales. I'm running them in RAID 1 and plan on using them as a dedicated pool for my Nextcloud storage. Am yet to get Nextcloud working yet, so can't comment on their performance. They'll likely be more than fast enough.
Up to you, but I think if it was me I'd be looking to unload your old kit while it's still worth some money and investing in some more recent parts with better efficiency and upgradeability.
Thanks for the info here.
I was looking to update my current HTPC which streams from the PLEX server (direct play).
My challenge was discovering all the new hardware out today that would allow the HTPC (client) to play 4K HVEC / AV1 without any concerns. I only need to upgrade the motherboard and CPU
I stumbled across this and would like to get your thoughts?- Intel Core i3-13100 Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) 12MB Cache, up to 4.5 GHz
- MSI PRO-B760M-P-DDR4 (Supports 12th/13th Gen Intel Processors, LGA 1700, DDR4, PCIe 4.0, M.2, 2.5Gbps LAN, USB 3.2 Gen2, mATX)
I was curious if the Intel UHD Graphics 730 would handle 4k playback from plex, of if I would require from more horsepower from say a:
- GeForce GT 710 2GB DDR3 PCI-E2.0 DL-DVI VGA HDMI Passive Cooled Single Slot Low Profile Graphics Card (ZT-71302-20L
Looking forward to hear your feedback regarding this.
Thank you.
-
6 hours ago, JorgeB said:
This is normal, and the higher the better, it means the ARC is being fully utilized, it's normal to always be around 95-100%
Hello,
You rock man, thanks for all the feedback, really appreciate your time clarifying these concerns!
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Correct.
Another question while I have you, since I just deployed the ZFS pool on NVMe -- I was reviwing the 'system' section in 'dashboard'
The percentage on the ZFS pool, why does it seem high usage, is this due to it being accessed (it only has one docker on the pool).
I looked at the space used vs. space free and I don't think it is related to that?
Any feedback would be great so I am understanding what the 'system' percentage is displaying.
Thanks.
-
22 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
Correct.
Thank you my friend.
I reviewed all shares and disabled NFS on the (1X) share that had 'export' set to 'yes' (now changed to 'no').
Hope that resolves the random concern regarding disk shares disappearing.... strange one for sure.
I be sure to follow-up if the concern reoccurs. -
3 minutes ago, JorgeB said:
If not needed disable it for all shares, it a share by share setting.
Ok, appreciate the prompt follow-up.
For sanity, to disable NFS Shares select:
Shares > Share Name > NFS Security Settings > Export > No
Which should disable it? -
4 hours ago, JorgeB said:
Dec 10 15:19:52 UnRAID shfs: shfs: ../lib/fuse.c:1450: unlink_node: Assertion `node->nlookup > 1' failed.It's this issue:
Some workarounds discussed there, mostly disable NFS if not needed or you can change everything to SMB.
Hello,
Appreciate this info.
As it stands for this share > NFS Security Settings > No (are set).
I also saw you posted this:Settings > Global Shares Settings -> Tunable (support Hard Links): no
I can set this setting once I can stop the array. I don't believe I require NFS sharing, I thought maybe it was required for dockers. Would I be required to disable NFS globally, or just on this specific share?
Under Global share settings, I don't see a spot at this time to disable SMB or NFS.
Currently I am seeing 'Enable Disk Shares' & 'Enable User Shares'
-
On 11/21/2023 at 4:06 AM, JorgeB said:
Hard to say without the diags.
No.
Hello,
I shut down the plex docker today to restart and the following error came back when attempting to restart, and all my unraid shares disappeared. I pulled diags
Not sure why this happens
-
On 6/28/2022 at 2:24 PM, ConnerVT said:
One thing I would try first is to delete all of the codecs in your Plex appdata codecs folder. It has been a long running issue with plex, where a codec gets corrupt and causes a playback issue. When you restart Plex, it will go out on the internet and reload the folder with the current set of codecs.
This issue is specific to Plex, on all platforms, not just Unraid.
Hello,
I attempted this without success.
I have content that is in EAC5.1 that does work as it should, then other content that is EAC5.1 that previously worked -- which now does not.
I attempted to delete the codecs out of the local plex HTPC folder and re-load it, and it does not work on these 4k files... im puzzled to why it stopped playing EAC on only the 4k EAC files?Any suggestions?
EDIT:
Sorted it out via some testing, it is due to the local network -
On 12/8/2023 at 8:01 PM, Yivey_unraid said:
If you change from your custom Docker network to Host, do you get an IP then? I seem to remember that Plex's official container suggests running it with Host, but I'm not sure. I know other Docker images doesn't suggest it.
Hello,
Appreciate the follow-up.
To answer your question, yes changing the network to host (default state) does work and is operational. I was pondering adding the plex docker container through a reverse proxy which is on my custom network and was pondering why the IPs were not applying on a custom network.
Based on your feedback, I may have to continue my research to drill down on how to accomplish this.
Thank you kindly :-)
-
Resolved over an embarrassing concern... typo in the variable -- unreal @ me !
-
2
-
-
On 11/4/2022 at 7:26 PM, Travisw said:
I have been using Plex with Plex pass for several months. I pass through a GTX760 using nvidia driver 470.141.03. It worked up until I did the more resent Unraid update and required a reinstall of the drivers due to some issue in the release. This solved the problem and allowed Plex to run again. I also verified the was transcoding using watch nvidia-smi. Everything was good. Today I noticed my CPU was really working so I checked watch nvidia-smi and nothing was working. Using Tautulli I can see Plex is transcoding using (HW) but for some reason its not using my GPU. I shut plex down and checked my container to ensure it still had all the stuff needed for passing the GPU then restarted. Still not working. If anyone has any idea I would appreciate it.
Same with me, never has worked
did you fix it ? -
here is SMI
Here is the docker run
docker run -d --name='Plex-Media-Server' --net='eth1' --ip='192.168.1.2' -e TZ="America/New_York" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e HOST_HOSTNAME="UnRAID" -e HOST_CONTAINERNAME="Plex-Media-Server" -e 'PLEX_CLAIM'='claim-TOKEN HERE -e 'PLEX_UID'='99' -e 'PLEX_GID'='100' -e 'VERSION'='latest' -e 'NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES'='all' -e 'NVIDIA_VISABLE_DEVICES'='GPU-867b6976-8663-b63c-234e-59c42267ad88' -l net.unraid.docker.managed=dockerman -l net.unraid.docker.webui='http://[IP]:[PORT:32400]/web' -l net.unraid.docker.icon='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plexinc/pms-docker/master/img/plex-server.png' -v '/tmp':'/transcode':'rw' -v '/mnt/':'/data':'rw' -v '/mnt/user/CACHE_PLEX/appdata/Plex-Media-Server/':'/config':'rw' --runtime=nvidia 'plexinc/pms-docker' 8bba84b89978daba07238055496e246f35aa4eb244db997964e52789f7126453 The command finished successfully!Maybe a full server reboot would kick it into gear?
-
2 hours ago, alturismo said:
may try with the official container in terms you have a 3rd party like binhex, linuxserver, ... running.
Using officiial
plexinc/pms-docker
[Plugin] Docker Patch 6.12.8
in Plugin Support
Posted
Thanks for this info. Confirmed on (1X) of my instances that the plugin has removed/uninstalled itself from the plugin lists. I will confirm when I have maintenance time to update the OS
Thank you devs and community