cmhardwick

no problem with those commands. i can resolve and connect with the site, it just can't retrieve the file See below result, from copy/paste the command above --2012-02-09 13:17:54-- http://unraid-unmenu.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unmenu_install Resolving unraid-unmenu.googlecode.com... 74.125.47.82 Connecting to unraid-unmenu.googlecode.com|74.125.47.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2012-02-09 13:17:54 ERROR 403: Forbidden.

I'm getting a 403 - forbidden error from the wget command to the unmenu repository. Is there a workaround for this?

nope. work machine is in my company office, others are at home. desktop is static IP, laptop is DHCP and the scope doesn't overlap by a longshot. It's been doing it for months. gotten used to it, just wondering what may be causing it since it's on multiple machines, different locations. as a side note, THANKS FOR ALL YOUR EXPERTISE JOE!

then it's on multiple machines Work, home desktop, home laptop. all of them

Not a major thing, but EVERY TIME, I have to login twice. The first time it tells me my credentials are invalid, then the second time the forum takes my credentials (same credentials, no typos). Any hints? I dont' have the password saved or anything, I'm typing it each time. Thanks!

GREAT movie! I need to see about getting that for my collection. For those are love classic mystery novels/movies such as Agatha Christie, and the Thin Man ... check out Neil Simon's Murder by Death! A great comic tribute to these great old characters (Hercule Poirot, Miss Marple, Charlie Chan, Sam Spade, Nick Charles) for fans of Hitchcock, check out another great comic tribute, Mel Brooks' High Anxiety

I'm going to have to try mine again. When I tried it before, same port, same cable, etc, it wouldn't sync-up. Got a "sync beat not detected" or something similar in the log so I switched to plain old PCI Intel Pro. Thanks for the post about it working.

is it just me, or does the "show unread posts since last visit" not work? Even though there are many new posts, if I click this I MAY get 1 or 2, usually none.

ZOOM ZOOM ZOOM!!! love it! ;D ;D ;D

I was speaking more on the diskshare configuration pages and your "include/exclude" settings there. Yes, unRAID will pickup the top-level directories and make them user shares. sorry for not being clear.

Joe L., One reason for making the assignments to the same slots is user shares, if they are defined. They are based on the logical drive assignments, so those could be screwed up I would think if you don't match the assignments on the device screen. But like you said, Parity is priority!

do a screen shot of your devices webpage (landscape works best to me). This will give you drive number assignments and show you the serial numbers. Shut down the array and re-arrange the drives like you want. turn it back on. it will come up with errors (most likely unassigned). DO NOT START THE ARRAY!! Go to the devices screen and assign, by serial number, the drives to the original drive numbers. Then you can start the array and you'll be fine. Physical location does not matter as long as they are logically assigned to the same drives numbers within unRAID.

hawihoney, Seagate Sata drives still have jumpers for 150 and 300, which come jumpered for 150 by default for some reason. Just an FYI

As long as the top level directories match, yes, your user shares will grow. Just be sure to put the drives in the INCLUDE section of the web interface as you add them as well. I did this when I added another drive for the share Movies, manually adding the "movies" directory to the new drive and it's worked great. If I've completely lead him astray, please correct me but I'm sure this is what I've done as I've added drives, adding the directories to the drive that I wanted to be there and also added that new drive to the "user shares" section of the web interface. Good luck and CONGRATS on the new baby coming along!

I agree with you RockDawg. that wasn't much of an answer. All my systems run XP (in various version ... MCE, PRO, HOME) and all my shares always show up. OK, even though nothing's changed, a couple of questions/suggestions: 1) how often to you reboot your various systems? (laptop I'm assuming daily, but others may be longer). Does rebooting get your shares back? 2) Verify on ALL machines that the workgroup is exactly the same (even down to case though I don't believe it really is case sensitive) 3) Any consistency on your XP machines as to when they started disappearing? Oh well, it's a start ... off to lunch now

Ahh, Close Encounters of the Third Kind - Special edition

or should that be "purrrrrrrity"

if you set the include disks as well as split level, then it shouldn't roll over to another disk. It should only create the new folders on the disks in the "include disks", from the way I understand it.

you were already running at over 80MB/s? SWEET!!!

yeah, swap space. Would be great, as someone did with a custom script I think, small drive in the box, not part of the array, swapdisk. Great to see you back, BTW!

I heard about this software on another forum (xLobby). Looked into it, and the price point (free to get started if you have an extra box laying around) was perfect The hardware costs, minus drives, is really minimal for what it does. I've already had reason to say THANK YOU UNRAID when I came back from vacation, powered up the unRaid box and boom, one drive dead. Had about 250gb of DVDs on it. Luckily I had just purchased some new drives so, out with the bad, in with the new, rebuild on the fly while being able to watch a show that I know was on that drive. Can't beat that functionality. My system wasn't unavailable while the rebuild was being done. I also later, after it was complete and before I went to bed, installed the other new drive to expand the array and let it chug away at clearing it overnight. Anyway, great product, works perfectly for me so far and has already saved me having to re-rip many many DVDs.

Make sure in the web interface that you are EXPORTING READ/WRITE either the diskshares (individual disks) or usershares (which are virtual disks and can span multiple disks).

not sure what price point you are looking at, but CyberGuys.com has the AMS 5-in-3 module for $139, the 4-in-3 for $109 and the 3-in-2 for $94. Currently I have the 3 in 2 and it works great. Drives never go above 40C even during heavy use.

Naaahhh, it's just you

that's the SAMBA share making it show as NTFS, also, with the new writable user shares, I've noticed that you get the "disk size" of your entire array, not just the share or an individual drive. I would like to add that I'd prefer it show the size of the individual share for quick reference rather than the entire array