![](http://content.invisioncic.com/u329766/set_resources_34/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
bmfrosty
-
Posts
174 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by bmfrosty
-
-
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:22 planner.go:493: ---------------------------------------------------------
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:22 planner.go:494:
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:22 planner.go:504: =========================================================
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:22 planner.go:505: Bytes To Transfer: 727.02 GB
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:22 planner.go:506: ---------------------------------------------------------
W: 2018/01/12 09:07:33 server.go:331: closing socket (&{ws:0xc4201ac480 onMessage:0x6e6730 onClose:0x6e6780}): invalid character ' ' in string escape code
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:33 core.go:158: Sending operation
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:43 core.go:153: Sending state
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:43 core.go:148: Sending config
I: 2018/01/12 09:07:43 core.go:163: Sending storage
-
Great. I finished my operation with rsync, but once your update is available, I'll be happy to retest the smaller share that had the issue.
-
One of my movie directories fails too. Here are some interesting directory names:
'Master\ Harold'\ ...\ And\ the\ Boys\ (2010)/
*batteries\ not\ included\ (1987)/Scotland,\ Pa.\ (2001)/
WALL·E\ (2008)/
Maybe these help?
Would be happy to PM you logs if that would help.
-
I've had similar problems in 4.0.0 as Urlryn, but my assumption has been different, since I've been less patient. I've gotten his error:
W: 2017/12/17 07:59:25 server.go:331: closing socket (&{ws:0xc4201c4090 onMessage:0x6e6730 onClose:0x6e6780}): unexpected end of JSON input
But I've also seen this:
W: 2017/12/17 08:00:49 server.go:331: closing socket (&{ws:0xc4200fc240 onMessage:0x6e6730 onClose:0x6e6780}): invalid character ' ' in string escape code
I think in my vast anime collection I have some filenames that aren't being escaped correctly for the JSON and are causing the JSON interpreter to dump.
-
I checked DMESG and got the following:
[15479128.834955] usb 9-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd [15479128.851362] usb-storage 9-1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected [15479128.851602] scsi host10: usb-storage 9-1:1.0 [15479129.883589] scsi 10:0:0:0: Direct-Access ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 1001 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [15479129.884309] sd 10:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg13 type 0 [15479129.884571] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Very big device. Trying to use READ CAPACITY(16). [15479129.884711] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] 19532873728 512-byte logical blocks: (10.0 TB/9.10 TiB) [15479129.886510] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled [15479129.887376] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Asking for cache data failed [15479129.887380] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Assuming drive cache: write through [15479129.888003] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Very big device. Trying to use READ CAPACITY(16). [15479129.919531] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Very big device. Trying to use READ CAPACITY(16). [15479129.921260] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdn] Attached SCSI disk
Anyone have any ideas or advice?
EDIT: I originally included a preclear log in this, but it's appeared to be very old - 2014!
EDIT: NM! Got the preclear to run from the command line. Hopefully will be complete on Monday morning.
-
Unbalance is stopping a couple of hours into a move. I get an error like this:
I: 2017/10/19 00:17:58 core.go:944: Command Started: (src: /mnt/disk4) rsync -avPRX "TV/Angel" "/mnt/disk1/"
W: 2017/10/19 00:17:58 shell.go:176: rsync:exit:(exit status 23)
W: 2017/10/19 00:17:58 core.go:1016: Command Interrupted: rsync -avPRX "TV/Angel" "/mnt/disk1/" (exit status 23 : Partial transfer due to error)rsync man page is unhelpful:
23 Partial transfer due to error
Anyone have any idea where I could look next on this?
I'm starting to fear a disk issue.
-
I think someone else has already implemented it in slackware. I'll take a look. It's pretty minimal. Binaries, templates, and a configuration file in /etc that tells it where to look for container root directories.
-
LXC - Linux Containers is an alternative to docker that relies on the same underlying infrastructure as docker. The big difference is that it's built around system containers instead of application containers.
This would be great for things that have more more complex setups like torrent clients + vpn that are difficult under Docker. Lighter weight than KVM for larger system containers that one might want for supporting tools like ffmpeg and other file maintenance utilities.
-
Looks like it worked when I was on the local subnet.
-
Sorry. Meant to paste this:
Sorry, you are not authorized to access any file on this server
I get that every time I go there.
-
-
Was thinking about a X520-DA2 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106044 - but I have no idea if it will work with Unraid.
Does anyone have any experience?
The page for the controller is here:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106044
-
Unless you're using a very slow CPU [e.g. a single-core Atom or a very old Pentium] this should not be the case. And in general the onboard SATA ports are the best ones to use. So ... check the BIOS to confirm you have the SATA mode set to AHCI.
No. Shouldn't be a CPU issue. I'm running this:
root@maxi:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name"
model name : AMD A6-5400K APU with Radeon HD Graphics
model name : AMD A6-5400K APU with Radeon HD Graphics
root@maxi:~#
And my drives are all (except the 500gig one I was replacing):
root@maxi:~# smartctl -i /dev/sde | grep Model
Device Model: WDC WD30EFRX-68AX9N0
root@maxi:~#
I'm just wondering if the onboard controller might have been getting overwhelmed.
I'm currently in process of rebuilding on to the new 3TB drive (from the 500GB), and it's running at about 100MB/s.
-
I hope I within topic here, but even if I'm not, this is probably the place to do it rather than starting a new thread.
I found that preclear absolutely wrecked the speed of my array while it was happening. I stopped it, and the array sped back up.
I'm using the onboard SATA ports. Could this be attributed to cruddy onboard sata? Would I be better off buying a SAS HBA and feeding off of that instead?
[Plugin] unbalanced
in Plugin Support
Posted
I hit the upgrade, but maybe the upgrade didn't actually upgrade. Will try again.