dvd.collector
-
Posts
270 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by dvd.collector
-
-
From what I've read, you can add SSDs to the array, however TRIM will never run. Which is bad for SSDs
-
My current unraid server is pretty old now, however it still works fine - so have no reason to upgrade/replace the hardware.
However with SSD prices dropping, I recently bought 2x 4tb sata SSDs to replace two array drives (one parity and one data). Having now set all of that up, i read that this is probably a bad idea and I shouldn't use SSDs within the array.
So the solution seems to be to use the SSDs in a btrfs pool outside of the array, as that would support trim. However the version of unraid I am using (6.8.3) does not support multiple pools.
The reason I have never upgraded unraid is that some years ago when i tried upgrading to v6.9.x this broke passthru on my vm's. No one on the forums was able to help me fix that at the time. So I reverted back to a working 6.8.3.
I'm thinking that i should try upgrading again to the latest version and see where I stand. However as I am so far behind, I'm concerned I won't be able to revert easily if things don't go as expected.
Can anyone advise if downgrading back to v6.8.3 from v6.12.x is possible?
-
Yes mine is doing the same after updating today. How were you able to rollback?
-
Anyone else having issues with PIA today?
2021-10-11 11:55:29,641 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Unable to successfully download PIA json to generate token from URL 'https://privateinternetaccess.com/gtoken/generateToken' [info] 8 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs...Seeing this error on all of the endpoints I have tried (around 10).
Annnnndddd its working again now. Presumably an issue at PIA. -
I had exactly the same problem and raised a thread on here. No updates, so rolled back to 6.8.3.
-
Has anyone else started seeing this error today?
2021-04-15 15:50:53,919 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 1, column 7 2021-04-15 15:50:53,919 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Unable to successfully download PIA json to generate token from URL 'https://10.0.0.1/authv3/generateToken' [info] 12 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs...It just keeps repeating in the logs over and over.
-
I downgraded back to 6.8.3 and all is working again.
-
I had a win10 VM working fine prior to the upgrade to 6.9.1 (and now 6.9.2). However now the VM will not boot showing this error:
2021-04-15T09:59:32.788681Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Cannot reset device 0000:02:00.1, depends on group 16 which is not owned.Am assuming this relates to my Nvidia graphics card I am passing though.
Here are the groups:
IOMMU group 14: [10de:2182] 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation TU116 [GeForce GTX 1660 Ti] (rev a1) IOMMU group 15: [10de:1aeb] 02:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation TU116 High Definition Audio Controller (rev a1) IOMMU group 16: [10de:1aec] 02:00.2 USB controller: NVIDIA Corporation TU116 USB 3.1 Host Controller (rev a1) Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hubI have ACS Override set to "both".
I've also tried passing through the device in group 16, but that seems to cause the VM not to boot at all.
-
anyone know if PureVPN works?
-
So I've tried every endpoint in the PIA list and all throw this:
2020-09-09 10:39:03,388 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] List of PIA endpoints that support port forwarding:- [info] ca-toronto.privateinternetaccess.com [info] ca-montreal.privateinternetaccess.com [info] ca-vancouver.privateinternetaccess.com [info] de-berlin.privateinternetaccess.com [info] de-frankfurt.privateinternetaccess.com [info] france.privateinternetaccess.com [info] czech.privateinternetaccess.com [info] spain.privateinternetaccess.com [info] ro.privateinternetaccess.com [info] israel.privateinternetaccess.com [info] Attempting to get dynamically assigned port... 2020-09-09 10:39:24,196 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Exit code '52' from curl != 0 or no response body received [info] 12 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs... 2020-09-09 10:39:24,196 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Exit code '52' from curl != 0 or no response body received [info] 12 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs...Is PIA removing port forwarding ability completely?
If so, is there a different VPN that supports port forwarding that anyone would recommend?
EDIT, saw this on the PIA website:
* The information contained within this article will only work with our Current/Previous Generation servers. Our Next Generation servers do not currently offer port-forwarding outside of the application. *So I guess as they upgrade their servers this will stop working. Back to my other question then, can anyone recommend a different VPN that will work well with this docker?
-
On 7/22/2020 at 1:24 PM, binhex said:
yes, as the log says, pia vpn api not accessible, i would assume only for this endpoint (france), try another of the ones listed in the log.
OK I switched to Germany and it seems to work now.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 7/20/2020 at 10:19 AM, binhex said:
do the following:-
https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/help.md
Attached log. I am assuming that this is the issue:
[warn] Unable to download file from url 'http://209.222.18.222:2000/?client_id=b911029a01c805dd6c6d72c547ed627e84ec450593a5c59d3a94bbd10f4cff5a', exiting script...
[warn] PIA VPN port assignment API currently down, terminating OpenVPN process to force retry for incoming port...Is this a PIA problem?
-
Hi all,
this container has been working fine for me for ages, but in the last couple of days I've been seeing this error:
2020-07-20 09:39:43,246 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Attempting to get dynamically assigned port... 2020-07-20 09:39:43,372 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Exit code '56' from curl != 0 or no response body received [info] 12 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs... 2020-07-20 09:39:53,431 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Exit code '52' from curl != 0 or no response body received [info] 11 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs... ... 2020-07-20 09:41:44,100 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Exit code '56' from curl != 0 or no response body received, exhausted retries 2020-07-20 09:41:44,101 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Unable to download file from url 'http://209.222.18.222:2000/?client_id=d69a030e782a094400b7a58b95cd54440c69b881358170e6b28ea3c437f4f223', exiting script... 2020-07-20 09:41:44,101 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] PIA VPN port assignment API currently down, terminating OpenVPN process to force retry for incoming port... 2020-07-20 09:41:44,102 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Mon Jul 20 09:41:44 2020 event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)Neither privoxy or rtorrent works.
Any ideas what is causing this?
-
1 hour ago, testdasi said:
That would have been right 5-10 years ago but it's not true any more.
Even back when RDP didn't work with games, GPU hardware acceleration still worked.
You can now play games via RDP on Windows 10 (it was also reported to work with Windows 8 but I don't have any Windows 8 machine to test).
- Not all games will work. Some games work but buggy e.g. audio issues.
- Latency is ok but don't expect to play twitchy FPS
- Graphics performance is more like watching a movie (think 24fps) so again no twitchy stuff
Don't expect to use Teamviewer for free. Their free for personal uses policy is a scam because they can arbitrarily say "commercial use detected" and force you to pay for it. Just google "Teamviewer commercial use detected" and fine the comically long complaint topic about this issue, for which Teamviewer can't even bother to respond.
Even if let's say RDP doesn't work, there are so many free alternatives out there such as NoMachine, Parsec, even VNC just to name some.
But note that remote desktop is still remote desktop. If you expect to be just like you are sitting next to the workstation then you will be disappointed.
It may be different by application I suppose, but I'm using win10 physical machine to a win10 vm (with an nvidia GPU passed through) and when using RDP the gpu is not detected for hardware encoding in Resolve (or Powerdirector). Using teamviewer it is.
-
I didn't think using RDP you could get hardware acceleration from your GPU.
I found using teamviewer rather than RDP worked better for me.
-
Has anyone had issues with Sonarr not automatically starting when the array starts recently. All was fine until a couple of days ago and now Sonaar will not auto start.
It starts fine if I go and manually choose start from the menu....
Am unsure exactly which parts of the log are current as it doesn't seem to create a new log when it starts, but these are the last entries from when it does not startup.
[cont-finish.d] executing container finish scripts...
[cont-finish.d] done.
[s6-finish] syncing disks.
[s6-finish] sending all processes the TERM signal.
[s6-finish] sending all processes the KILL signal and exiting. -
Conversion to raid0 appears to have worked:
Many thanks for your help!
-
OK so when I click on Cache, I can change that to btrfs. When I click on cache2, it says "unknown" in partition format.
Went ahead and changed Cache to btrfs anyway then clicked format.
It looks like this worked (see screenshot).
Now just need to change to raid 0 i guess.
-
Attached Diagnostics.
tower-diagnostics-20181108-1929.zip
Can see this in the logs, is it trying to format one drive as XFS?
Nov 8 19:26:34 Tower emhttpd: shcmd (1000): /sbin/wipefs -a /dev/sde1
Nov 8 19:26:34 Tower emhttpd: shcmd (1001): mkfs.xfs -m crc=1,finobt=1 -f /dev/sde1
-
OK, so I stopped the array, ran the blkdiscard command on both disks, restarted array but see the same error message.
Should I have removed them as cache drives first? I'll try that now anyway.
-
OK, I removed the raid 0 from the bios and added both ssd's as cache drives. Now I see the attached error message.
Clicking format does nothing.
-
Thanks for the quick reply.
I don't suppose I have much choice, but is a btrfs raid 0 pool as fast as I would expect (e.g nearly double the speed of a single ssd)?
Lee.
-
I want to use two ssd's in a raid 0 configuration as a cache drive.
I created a RAID0 array in the bios of my unraid server, however unraid does not seem to see that - it still sees the individual disks. Is this expected?
-
yep thats got it, thanks
Unassigned Devices - Managing Disk Drives and Remote Shares Outside of The Unraid Array
in Plugin Support
Posted · Edited by dvd.collector
Hi all. I'm on an older unraid version (6.8.3) and am sure i've had this plugin installed in the past.
However when i search in community applications, i can't find this plugin.
Does this plugin work with my version of unraid and if so, how can i install it if it doesn't show in community applications?