Fx.

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fx.

  1. your first key is $119 its $30 for a second one (or two for $149) if you read http://lime-technology.com/registration-keys/ one parity disk but no striping so only lose whatever data was on the drive that died (if more than one die at once)
  2. it should do, from intels arc for the 430 - Instruction Set 64-bit Intel® 64 ‡ Yes
  3. that seems to run a turian 2 whcih seems to run x64 so.. yes http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/48396B_Turion_N54L_vs_i5_520M_flyer.pdf edit: but yeah if you already have virtualisation set up, just run up another vm, be the easiest way
  4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WoW64 for *nix it adds complexity that people would rather not support (multilib doesnt work very well usually and even worse on slackware) its one more thing to support when the alternative is to update the software which tends to be a better answer anyway edit: and windows only runs x32 binarys that dont touch drivers or hardware in any real way, nix tends to get a bit more direct especially appliance level nix
  5. nice comes with ssh baked in, small but appreciated
  6. as he says above, thats an addon, stop adding things no thats because 127.x isnt a valid address, its a loopback address not nearly as hard as getting a new network card going under nt4 or dos was the syslog doesnt show any networking info, are you still using the onboard or have you swapped? (you could put all your cards in and hook them up until we find out what one works) again, what onboard NIC does it have? what other NIC cards have you tried?
  7. the actual install docs are here - http://lime-technology.com/unraid-server-installation/ assuming you have a working supported NIC and working local DNS those docs work fine everything else is an addon, get it working on the basic imho try just "ifconfig" it's reading like it doesnt support your network card, try the PCI one again (preferably an intel or realtek) quick googling i cant find what onboard card that pc has
  8. i wouldnt start with unmenu, thats a custom plugin addon, the new official webgui is great -> https://github.com/limetech/webGui great to play around with but add that stuff once you've set up and played around preclear is good for drive testing though and yeah, i never understood the attraction to opendns, local stuff is fine
  9. the giant thread under "hard drives and controllers" is your best bet -> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=12404.0
  10. check your router, maybe its got an IP but your local dns hasnt updated, check your router (or dhcp server) leases see whats there what NIC do you have? maybe its not supported... using version 5.0.4 ? why is your kernel newer than mine... Tower Login: root Linux 3.9.22p-unRAID root@tower:~# 5.0.4 uses 3.9.11p .... "I've yet to find anything on why commands aren't working." because those commands dont exist, they're either wrong (in the case of ipconfig vs ifconfig) or have been depreciated you need to tell us what other commands dont work try it without instaling the new webgui first imho thats ifconfig eth0 (thats a zero) heres mine: root@Unraid:~# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr BLAHDEBLAH inet addr:192.168.0.200 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 what menu... the official beta one is on github not googledocs... but yeah you should start fresh first make sure it works (and what NICs are you trying) "doesnt load" browser gives you a "cannot connect" ? (dns/ip error) 404 not found? some php error? (some issue with the webgui) you need to be more descriptive http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=9822.0 you might want to read through bits of the stickied "read this first" Thread
  11. its ifconfig not ipconfig (ipconfig is windows ifconfig is *nix)
  12. http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=12404.0 ^ this thread answers all
  13. for unraid you dont actually want a "raid card" you want a jbod card as unraid itself takes care of the array and the perc's dont pass through smart info or direct drive access
  14. edit5000: wikipedia says this for dm raid: offers an interface to the Linux kernel's software RAID driver (md) so doesnt WeeboTech comment stand that it wont work? edit: most of the docs i find regarding dm+lvm talk about it interfacing with mdadm
  15. thanking you, figured as much but wanted to make sure i wasnt crazy when did this dm thing become standard :'( that'll teach me for not doing any "heavy" linux work in 4years+ and trying to jump right back in edit: i knew i was right, linux software raid googling leads mainly to mdadm (which makes sense i guess) editedit: weirdly enough all this last couple months crazyness leading me into more investigation and planning of what i'd actually like my server to achieve i'm leaving towards windows2012 storage server with snapraid, dont like the interface but that + drive pooling does seem to fit my needs better.... if the unraid array cannot coexist with another array especially (more comfortable in the wintel world)
  16. nice thread, will have to take some time to digest it properly, quick thing ive been mulling over, does the unraid md patch stop you using mdadm to manage a seperate array? or does it just add features? (silly question but surely i cant be the only one wondering and didn't see it mentioned in any of the other threads)
  17. I took it as him meaning 100%, I'm sure he'll clarify though. yeah just wanted to make sure he saw + corrected it before some of the angrier folk got all crazy (hence removing my post after he updated his - clarification it had originally said $100 rather than 100%)
  18. rpm is redhats installer files, "redhat package manager" debian/ubuntu use .deb redhat + derivatives use .rpm
  19. unRAID "AntiChrist Edition" is 100% of the md Linux Module and emhttp (If Tom ever decides he will permit it which I am assuming is he won't) or an opensource alternative. I didn't have reverse engineer anything. aah, i figured the "opensource alternative" side of things would require some reverse engineering, was just trying to dissuade the people saying the world "stealing" (copyright infringement isnt technically stealing anyways but thats another huge dark hole of arguments)