[Unraid OS version 6.10.0-rc1 available]

On 10/28/2021 at 11:13 PM, PeteAron said:

I wont annoy anyone by posting my objection to the UPC again, but in case it makes any difference to the company, for whom I have had great respect and good feelings for about 11 years, this will represent the end of my support.  I will not upgrade from my current state.  I have ZERO interest in having my servers connected to the internet except for one application on my backup server.  There is no need to take any risk whatsoever of allowing some mistake/mismanagement/malicious attack/ whatever at Lime technology and _especially_ over this "for information only" forum.  I am stunned that connecting registration on this forum directly to our server license and information was even floated except over a beers.   I really can't believe this is being considered.

 

I suppose the modern way of things is subscriptions to gouge every last dime out of customers at a seemingly low price month by month but I am rejecting it from microsoft and will reject it here.  I am quite happy with my purchase, have recommended UNRAID uncounted times to others and several friends are now users but that is at an end.  I will remain at my current version of unraid that that's that.  It sounds like i need also to delete this forum account, unfortunately.

 

I am certain noone gives a rat's but I thought I would clarify my position before signing off of the forum.  

 

Why not just charge for version upgrades instead?  Is that because people might decide they dont need the current version and you'd like to charge them anyway?  At the price of the security of my servers?  I just dont understand.  I have happily paid for my licenses and was actually considering purchasing a third, but man this will get very expensive very quickly if i pay for it every month.

 

what happens when i stop paying?  

Seams everyone is ignoring the fact that your server will need to permanently phone home.... Guess next will be pushing ad's to the server web interface..... 

Not ok with this..... 

 

My server should be fully private.... 

[[6.8-RC1] kernel: tun: unexpected GSO]

    <interface type='bridge'>
      <mac address='52:54:00:39:64:90'/>
      <source bridge='br0'/>
      <model type='virtio-net'/>
      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
    </interface>

ok this seams to fix the issues for me no more dmesg spam

changed from virtio to virtio-net

will do more testing

[[6.8-RC1] kernel: tun: unexpected GSO]

i found an easy workaround it seams .... just don't use the virtio driver in the vm

 

from:

    <interface type='bridge'>
      <mac address=**:**:**:**:**:**/>
      <source bridge='br0'/>
      <model type='virtio'/>
      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
    </interface>

to:

    <interface type='bridge'>
      <mac address=**:**:**:**:**:**/>
      <source bridge='br0'/>
      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/>
    </interface>

 

removing the model will revert back to default driver downside is the little higher cpu usage and lower throughput