Sledgehamma
-
Posts
105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by Sledgehamma
-
-
Can sickbeard understand what I've downloaded? The problem is that I download winrar archieves and when they are extraceted the name does not every time have the same construction and I download both, TV shows and movies which have to be transfere to different shares.
So what I've found the best method is to try with putty and a "nohup mv ....." command
Please correct me if I'm wrong with my impressions about sickbeard.
-
Thanks I'll try it. And report back if its working or not.
-
Very great work!
Works after first attempt
But can someone explain how the downloaded data will be moved from cache to the array?
-
It looks like it. You can run a
reiserfsck --check /dev/md3
to verify.
I've done that, as mentioned without errors.
For now it seems, that everything works.
So checkdisk on the usb drive and reiserfck+fix made it.
-
I checked my USB disk on my Windows mashine and it there were some error which are fixed now.
Then I did another reiser check which reportet errors so I tried to fix them and it reports that:
reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Sun Sep 18 01:19:54 2011
###########
Replaying journal: Done.
Reiserfs journal '/dev/md3' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed
Checking internal tree.. finished
Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10630: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs. Will be fixed later.
Checking Semantic tree:
/Filme/Star Wars Episode I Die dunkle Bedrohung (1999).isovpf-10670: The file [4 2129] has the wrong size in the StatData (43233935360) - corrected to (43233939 456)
vpf-10680: The file [4 2129] has the wrong block count in the StatData (
- cor finished No corruptions foundThere are on the filesystem:
Leaves 371265
Internal nodes 2208
Directories 189
Other files 2377
Data block pointers 375400398 (10555849 of them are zero)
Safe links 0
###########
reiserfsck finished at Sun Sep 18 01:33:06 2011
Is my file Star Wars Episode I ok, again ?
After the try to fix it I make again a reiser check and no curroptions were found
But I cannot copy to that disk
-
I made a mistake....now it's successfully running:
Reiserfs journal '/dev/md3' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed
Checking internal tree.. finished
Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs.
Checking Semantic tree:
/Filme/28 Days Later (2002).Isovpf-10680: The file [4 2563] has the wrong block count in the StatData (7), should be (0) /Unstoppable (2011)/BDMV/finished
3 found corruptions can be fixed when running with --fix-fixable
###########
reiserfsck finished at Sat Sep 17 13:51:55 2011
then I used "reiserfsck --fix-fixable /dev/md3":
reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Sat Sep 17 13:53:37 2011
###########
Replaying journal: Done.
Reiserfs journal '/dev/md3' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed
Checking internal tree.. finished
Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10630: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs. Will be fixed later.
Checking Semantic tree:
/Filme/28 Days Later (2002).Isovpf-10680: The file [4 2563] has the wrong block count in the StatData (7) - corrected to (0) /Unstoppable (2011)/BDMV/finished
No corruptions found
There are on the filesystem:
Leaves 371469
Internal nodes 2208
Directories 189
Other files 2377
Data block pointers 375607045 (10762496 of them are zero)
Safe links 0
###########
reiserfsck finished at Sat Sep 17 14:06:47 2011
So is erverything OK ?
-
That sounds not good
ahhhHow bad is it ?
-
Run reiserfsck --check on disk 3: http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php?title=Check_Disk_Filesystems
It reports:
reiserfs_open: the reiserfs superblock cannot be found on /dev/sdc.
Failed to open the filesystem.
If the partition table has not been changed, and the partition is
valid and it really contains a reiserfs partition, then the
superblock is corrupted and you need to run this utility with
--rebuild-sb.
-
Thanks for the replies. I try to check disk USB stick and check the disk filesystem of disk 3.
But I have to wait until my preclear is finished. I don't want to cancel it. So I can try it tomorrow night I hope.
-
Mainboard: Asus E35M1-M AMD E350 µATX http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_CPU_on_Board/E35M1M/
SATA Controller: 2x http://www.asrock.com/mb/spec/Card.us.asp?Model=SATA3%20Card (But the HDD is on the onboard controller)
Power: 400W bequiet! Straight Power E8 80+ Bronze
RAM: 2GB Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1066 DIMM CL7 Single
Parity: WD20EARS
Disk 1: WD20EARS
Disk 3: WD20EARS
Disk 6: WD1502FYPS
Disk 7: WD15EADS
unRaid Beta 12a
-
Ok heres my Problem:
I want to copy some Isos (around 50gb) to my array. But Windows 7 says INSTANTLY "Theres a problem accessing \\tower\Filme Make shure you are connected to the network and try again" So I spammed the "try again" button, spun up all disks, but no change.
The strange thing is that alle the time unraid is responsive, I can even browse to my shares!
Then I copy the file directly to a disk 3 (That's the disk unraid want to copy it because of the Allocation method most-free) and the same error on windows.
But now I try it to copy on another disk and hey it's copying!
Before I copied ~1,5TB Data on disk 3 and at copying (I was about to copy 2TB) the error message came up.
After reboot I noticed read and writes on that disk: 54485 reads and 49 writes.
The Syslog shows this and I don't know what that means:
Sep 16 15:52:20 Tower shfs/user: duplicate object: /mnt/disk6/Filme/Transformers (2007).ISO
Sep 16 15:53:37 Tower last message repeated 6 times
Sep 16 15:55:00 Tower last message repeated 6 times
Sep 16 15:56:38 Tower last message repeated 2 times
Why duplicate ?
My Share hast Split level 3
like
-disk
-sharename (Filme)
-Moviename
Allocation method: most-free
Network Setup: Windows 7 mashine -> WRT 54GS Linksys Router -> unRaid
The disk is a WD20ears unjumpered and successfully prelcear without errors.
-
I have the Asus E35M1-M (so NOT the Pro Version) running Beta 12a and really no problems. I transfered already 3,5TB via LAN to my array and no Problems (have to say that I used only 100mbit LAN).
BIOS Version is latest 1002.
So imo nothing against this Board.
On another Forum there are two user with the Pro Version of the board, latest BIOS and unraid V4.7 without problems.
-
So here are not so many pronlems, especially with the realtek nic I, assume a RC1 ist just around the corner. Am I right?
-
Thanks, so I buy a new one
-
While Parity check I'm getting multiple errors on one drive.
Using latest Beta 12a
The Syslog shows this:
Sep 9 21:35:35 Tower kernel: ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133
Sep 9 21:35:35 Tower kernel: ata10: EH complete
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: irq_stat 0x40000001
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: cmd 25/00:00:18:ca:22/00:04:1d:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: res 51/40:6f:a5:cc:22/00:01:1d:00:00/e0 Emask 0x9 (media error)
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Sep 9 21:35:39 Tower kernel: ata10.00: error: { UNC }
-
I installed V0.9b, then all the menu items were lined up on the left side. So I cleared the cache and everything looked as it should.
But after a reboot it looks like before (lined up on the left). So I cleared the cache again, and it looks like the stock UI.
So what am I doing wrong ?
I think I got it: On the Flash drive I created a folder "extra" and put there the tgz file. Read this at this post.
-
Ok I tested again, it's the SATA cable. Power cable is ok. solved
-
Thanks!
Smart Status: Failing
Get data off disk and run advanced tests below for more information
SMART Information: Short INQUIRY response, skip product id
A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more '-T permissive' options.
SMART Extended Test: Disk must be spun up before running tests
I used the option "spin up" on the mainmenum, but the SMART Extended Test says the same.
//edit:
I changed power and sata cable and there are no errors in the first few minutes. I report back! Thanks again!
-
Suddenly my parity disk went red. So I stopped the array, marked parity check and started the array. After that the unraid gui went short unresponsive and after a few seconds the array is started without the parity, which gets 384 Errors.
I don't know the reason for the errors, so I ask you. I hope the drive is not broken.
I'm using the latest Beta 12a
The Parity is a WD20ears unjumpered and I transfered before 1,5TB of Data per LAN to my array without any problems.
-
I hope the final version is on the horizon. Want to migrate to unraid but only on a final 5.0 version.
-
That sounds not god man
But build in Sata controller has only problems with UnRaid, because with WHS it´s fine.
Is Lime Tech working on it?
-
Thanks for your post Cyrnel, but the problems you describe are only with the network, right ?
So if I buy an Intel card, that would be fine.
My problem ist, that I bought this mainboard not long ago, so I do not like to buy another one 2 months later
I bought my NAS to use WHS, so I do not check the compatibility with unraid. Now I know WHS is crap and I need UnRaid
On the Asus Forum I read some Problems with the PCIe slot, not recognizing any Sata card, but it seems that this is solved.
So I am noch sure to switch to UnRaid, nice OS but it seems to have many problems with my hardware.
-
Because of no post for 2 months, I assume that this Board has a stable network connection with the new bios. Right?
- cor finished No corruptions found
pyLoad unMenu package
in User Customizations
Posted
How are your impressions with pyload ?
The program is very solid. No crashes or problems with downloading. An exception is the unrar, this works only with small files: 700mb working/30gb+ not working.
But there are several things I am missing:
-I can not see an ETA of my packages or my entire download list.
-I can not sort the packages manually. In the Queue windows you can change the order by dragging a package with the mouse, but if I change the window for example go to downloads and then back to queue, the order I chose is reverted back to the old. So I can not sort my downloads for my personal priority
-I can not move 2 packages into one or a new package.
Does anyone have tips for my problems or is there an other download manager ? I couldn't find one