Jump to content

digitalformula

Members
  • Content Count

    121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

17 Good

About digitalformula

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Sure, but that's why I asked if it's possible to make it user configurable. It wouldn't diminish the functionality of the plugin at all and could even still allow FCP to throw up a notification when an emergency release comes out. Edit: An "error" suggests something is broken. A plugin that isn't updated isn't something that's broken.
  2. Is it possible to add a user-defined alert level for the things FCP raises? To me it's not an error if FCP isn't the latest and isn't a warning if a Docker container isn't the latest (i.e. "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"). Showing those as errors and warnings is misleading.
  3. I would have thought that, too, but I have various aliases setup that do specify the appropriate private key when making the connection, and on a non-standard port now. ssh-agent shouldn't really be required after adding the key to the server's ~/.ssh/authorized_keys though (which I have done). I didn't "fix" it though. The workstation in question needed to be rebuilt and so I've just setup an unRAID-specific key pair that I'll use from now on. The original key is only used for some other private connections so doesn't need to be used for unRAID on this network. Thanks for responding, though!
  4. Where's the configuration or setting that says which IPs are blocked from connecting via SSH? I have checked /etc/hosts.deny but I believe it won't persist between reboots anyway. I can only connect if I use this: ssh -o IdentitiesOnly=yes root@unraid Additional info re why I'm asking: - Fix Common Problems said I was possibly compromised on March 14th. All the attempts came from the static IP of my workstation and all on a range of ports that aren't explicitly configured in unRAID - Until this afternoon SSH was still on port 22 but that's OK because of the other stuff below (it's not on port 22 anymore, but that's made no difference) - My ISP's router is a gateway device only and everything inside it is protected by various IDP and DPI devices (I would never use an ISP's "free" device as anything other than a gateway) - unRAID is not exposed to the internet, is not in any sort of DMZ and there are no port forwards or pinholes that allow SSH anywhere near it from the outside - I've rebooted - unRAID is the latest version - All containers and plugins are on latest versions - There's no access to anything from the outside except via a VPN from specific approved devices, including explicit MAC filtering - SSH keys in /boot/config/ssh are not 0 bytes in size, as per this: For that reason, I don't think I've actually been compromised - it was probably something else that I'm yet to track down. On that day I was making some changes and might've messed something up. Thanks
  5. I gave up waiting and moved PiHole to a CentOS 7 VM a while back. Deleted the PiHole container. Didn't have a lot of choice since I need VMs more than I need PiHole to be running as a container.
  6. how many subnet do you have? Is the computer that you tried to connect to pihole on the same subnet as the pihole? If not, try to use the same subnet, btw, pihole should have a web interface, try to open that as well Yup sorry I should've included that info before. unRAID, this desktop, the Pi-hole WebUI etc are all on the same subnet. Pi-hole and its UI are working fine and I can see traffic there + ads being blocked. Tested with speedtest.net and a few others that are known to be bad for ads. I don't really use KVM on unRAID anymore so I'll just ignore it for now. Thanks, though.
  7. Yes, same subnet - this part of the network is all on the same /24 (the other parts are DMZ etc, so completely isolated from unRAID). Edit: THe Pi-hole UI does show that IP as the "Pi-hole IPv4 address" though. Edit 2: Btw, Pi-hole is functioning just fine and ads are being blocked. I can see the stats in the UI.
  8. It is already configured as bridge. There's a setting for "Server IP" but no matter what I set that to, that IP doesn't respond to anything. It's no biggie, though - stopping KVM has worked.
  9. Hello - Is dnsmasq required for the operation of KVM? Asking as I'm trying to install Pihole but the Docker container is failing due to port 53 already being in use. Netstat tells me it is in use by dnsmasq on local address 192.168.122.1 and I've tracked that down to 192.168.122.0/24 being attached to virbir0 in the routing table. Stopping KVM allows the container to work. Can I still use KVM if I somehow remove/stop dnsmasq? Docker is more important than KVM on this server so it's not a biggie if the answer is no.
  10. I mean exactly that. Not deleted, just completely stopped/down/unavailable. GUI shows no shares and SSH listing of /mnt/user just shows "????????". No, restarting NFS doesn't help. The only way to get them back to reboot the entire unRAID server. No, I'm deleting them from an NFS mount in my Linux client (Ubuntu 19.04, but was 18.04 before that). Yes, they're all in one folder.
  11. @limetech Thanks for your response. I have tried setting the fuse_remember Tunable setting to 600 and, while it did seem to help for a few minutes, the problem came back straight away. Here is what I did: - Created 1000 zero byte files in /mnt/user/sys/1000_files - Deleted them via NFS mount on my client. This worked; I don't recall this ever working in the past. - Created 1000 1.2MB files in /mnt/user/sys/1000_files - Deleted them via NFS mount on my client. All shares immediately disappeared. FYI
  12. @limetech or someone ... ? Please? Yeah you can think I'm being a dick or demanding but this is a genuine issue.
  13. Bump? Surely I'm not the only one that thinks shares disappearing when you delete files is a bad thing? 😞
  14. By the way, I have tried setting up unRAID to point at itself, which does work. However nothing shows up in the Syslog at all when unRAID crashes as I've described above. For that reason I'd say the logs are pretty much useless. What you see below is when I started Syslog and then rebooted after I forced unRAID to bomb again. Jul 5 13:52:01 df-unRAID rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="8.1903.0" x-pid="26176" x-info="https://www.rsyslog.com"] start Jul 5 14:00:47 df-unRAID root: Delaying execution of fix common problems scan for 10 minutes Jul 5 14:00:47 df-unRAID emhttpd: Starting services... Jul 5 14:00:47 df-unRAID emhttpd: shcmd (205): /etc/rc.d/rc.samba restart Jul 5 14:00:48 df-unRAID rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="8.1903.0" x-pid="5461" x-info="https://www.rsyslog.com"] start Jul 5 14:00:49 df-unRAID root: Starting Samba: /usr/sbin/nmbd -D Jul 5 14:00:49 df-unRAID root: /usr/sbin/smbd -D Jul 5 14:00:49 df-unRAID root: /usr/sbin/winbindd -D