ootuoyetahi

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ootuoyetahi

  1. Not sure if you still need help but I believe the default port for openvpn is udp1194.
  2. Is there anything in this upgrade that could have caused the following message when I try to ssh into the server? @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that a host key has just been changed.
  3. Yes! My Yubikey will be delivered today. Any update or ETA to encryption? I agree with encryption per share. Also regarding 2nd USB, one can use something like a Yubikey.
  4. Hi and thanks for the reply. Yes, through VirtFS. I AM able to access my share over smb and nfs. Its puzzling because nothing has changed at all and its been working fine for about 4 months. The line to mount the unraid share (from /etc/fstab) in the KVM guest (ubuntu server 14.04) is here: unraid /glftpd/site/ 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,noauto,nobootwait,rw 0 0 If I try to mount it manually I get this error: mount: special device unraid does not exist This error makes me think KVM isnt passing the shares through to the guest but as far as I know the XML is correctly set up to pass them through. I have also attached the dmesg log. I'm not sure why it has worked a while back for you because VirtFS needs the guest network stack up and running before it can mount, you should append/prepend the _netdev mount option to your fstab file: unraid /glftpd/site/ 9p _netdev,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L 0 0 Thanks. I edited my fstab, put this in and it worked. No idea what happened or how this broke but I really appreciate the help.
  5. Hi and thanks for the reply. Yes, through VirtFS. I AM able to access my share over smb and nfs. Its puzzling because nothing has changed at all and its been working fine for about 4 months. The line to mount the unraid share (from /etc/fstab) in the KVM guest (ubuntu server 14.04) is here: unraid /glftpd/site/ 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,noauto,nobootwait,rw 0 0 If I try to mount it manually I get this error: mount: special device unraid does not exist This error makes me think KVM isnt passing the shares through to the guest but as far as I know the XML is correctly set up to pass them through. I have also attached the dmesg log. I just created a Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop VM and was about to manually mount a VirtFS folder from the unRAID host to inside the VM. From inside your VM, what do you get back from this command?: sudo cat /sys/bus/virtio/drivers/9pnet_virtio/*/mount_tag FYI, here's what I typed to manually mount inside the VM: sudo mount unraid /glftpd/site/ -t 9p -o trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L Hey.. sorry for just getting back to you now, long day. Anyway, the output of sudo cat /sys/bus/virtio/drivers/9pnet_virtio/*/mount_tag: unraidusername@glftpd:~$ It literally just returned the above. I replaced my username with username. When I ran your mount command, it seemed to mount my unraid share, so thank you for that. I will edit my /etc/fstab entry but I am still puzzled as to what actually broke.
  6. Hi and thanks for the reply. Yes, through VirtFS. I AM able to access my share over smb and nfs. Its puzzling because nothing has changed at all and its been working fine for about 4 months. The line to mount the unraid share (from /etc/fstab) in the KVM guest (ubuntu server 14.04) is here: unraid /glftpd/site/ 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,noauto,nobootwait,rw 0 0 If I try to mount it manually I get this error: mount: special device unraid does not exist This error makes me think KVM isnt passing the shares through to the guest but as far as I know the XML is correctly set up to pass them through. I have also attached the dmesg log. dmesg.txt
  7. Dear Experts', Everything was working fine until I brought the server down for a reboot. Once it came up, I was unable to access the shares in my VM. The VM works fine otherwise which seems strange to me. Here is my XML: <domain type='kvm' id='3'> <name>glftpd</name> <uuid>20c4aabf-1971-6b84-2ac8-48a6cda03e15</uuid> <description>ubuntu 14.04</description> <metadata> <snapshots/> </metadata> <memory unit='KiB'>524288</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>524288</currentMemory> <vcpu placement='static'>1</vcpu> <resource> <partition>/machine</partition> </resource> <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-2.1'>hvm</type> <boot dev='hd'/> <boot dev='hd'/> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> </features> <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='rtc' tickpolicy='catchup'/> <timer name='pit' tickpolicy='delay'/> <timer name='hpet' present='yes'/> </clock> <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff> <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot> <on_crash>restart</on_crash> <devices> <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/> <source file='/mnt/cache/vm/glftpd/glftpd/glftpd.qcow2'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hda' bus='virtio'/> <alias name='virtio-disk0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/> </disk> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/cache/vm/ubuntu-14.04.2-server-amd64.iso'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hdc' bus='ide' tray='open'/> <readonly/> <alias name='ide0-1-0'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='1' target='0' unit='0'/> </disk> <controller type='usb' index='0'> <alias name='usb0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x2'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pci-root'> <alias name='pci.0'/> </controller> <controller type='ide' index='0'> <alias name='ide0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x1'/> </controller> <filesystem type='mount' accessmode='passthrough'> <source dir='/mnt/user/unRAID'/> <target dir='unraid'/> <alias name='fs0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x0'/> </filesystem> <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:d9:aa:be'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <target dev='vnet0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <alias name='net0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> </interface> <serial type='pty'> <source path='/dev/pts/1'/> <target port='0'/> <alias name='serial0'/> </serial> <console type='pty' tty='/dev/pts/1'> <source path='/dev/pts/1'/> <target type='serial' port='0'/> <alias name='serial0'/> </console> <input type='tablet' bus='usb'> <alias name='input0'/> </input> <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/> <input type='keyboard' bus='ps2'/> <graphics type='vnc' port='5900' autoport='yes' websocket='5700' listen='0.0.0.0'> <listen type='address' address='0.0.0.0'/> </graphics> <video> <model type='vmvga' vram='16384' heads='1'/> <alias name='video0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/> </video> <memballoon model='virtio'> <alias name='balloon0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/> </memballoon> </devices> </domain> Here is the output of lspci -knn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] [8086:1237] (rev 02) Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Qemu virtual machine [1af4:1100] 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7000] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Qemu virtual machine [1af4:1100] 00:01.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7010] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Qemu virtual machine [1af4:1100] Kernel driver in use: ata_piix 00:01.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 USB [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7020] (rev 01) Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc QEMU Virtual Machine [1af4:1100] Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:01.3 Bridge [0680]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI [8086:7113] (rev 03) Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Qemu virtual machine [1af4:1100] Kernel driver in use: piix4_smbus 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: VMware SVGA II Adapter [15ad:0405] Subsystem: VMware SVGA II Adapter [15ad:0405] 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Red Hat, Inc Virtio network device [1af4:1000] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Device [1af4:0001] Kernel driver in use: virtio-pci 00:04.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Red Hat, Inc Virtio block device [1af4:1001] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Device [1af4:0002] Kernel driver in use: virtio-pci 00:05.0 Unclassified device [00ff]: Red Hat, Inc Virtio memory balloon [1af4:1002] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Device [1af4:0005] Kernel driver in use: virtio-pci 00:06.0 Unclassified device [0002]: Red Hat, Inc Virtio filesystem [1af4:1009] Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc Device [1af4:0009] Kernel driver in use: virtio-pci Its a ubuntu server with an ftpd installed which accesses (or used to) the unraid shares and that is the sole function of this box. Thanks for your help!
  8. I would love a docker for glftpd. Its a fully featured ftp daemon that has recently been resurrected from the dead. http://glftpd.eu/
  9. Would this be applicable to backup an UnRAID server to another unRAID server?
  10. I'm on Tapatalk and can't see which is red but I will check them out. Thank you.
  11. I actually looked at that but the problem is that those instructions are for docker templates. If I am looking at this right, the link I posted is a dockerfile which is not the same as a template. I've tried putting that link in the repository section but I get nothing in the container drop down. So my question really is, is there an east way to run this into a template?
  12. So I just put a new unRAID 6 box up and I want to install glftpd. I see here there is a dockerfile https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/c0rnflake/glftpd/dockerfile/ . My question is what do I do with this to turn it into something on unRAID? I apologize, I'm a TOTALLY new to dockers and I'm looking for a little guidance.
  13. Thats why I use wd blacks. Reds seem too inconsistent. Blacks cost more but are rock solid and come with a 5 year warranty.
  14. Thanks guys, I went with the Xeon.
  15. Hey guys, I am getting ready to purchase hardware for my next build. I am going with this board - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182821 and wanted to see your thoughts on processor. I was originally sold on this - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117317 but this http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00KPRWAX8/ref=psdc_229189_t2_B00KB4AI5W looks like a good possibility as well. The i7 supports hyperthreading which the xeon does not. Do you guys have any input?
  16. These boards dont have video cards correct? Do you NEED a video card to boot or will the run without it?
  17. You're probably right but if nothing else the discussion will tell let them know that their polls with 141 responses dont tell the whole story. It is a niche market but things like encryption and multiple drive parity they would potentially allow them to break into the commercial world.
  18. I 100% disagree with your comment, and in fact this would lose me as a customer. I can say the same thing about all of this support for plugins and docker containers and other superficial additions. I dont use it, I dont want it, why did I pay for it? unRAIDs core functionality is (well I thought when I purchased it anyway) fault tolerance and the application needs to be brought up to date with todays technology to remain relevant.
  19. If they find themselves in a tough spot its because they put themselves there. This is supposed to be a nas os and they have strayed from the course by getting so caught up in other things. The core feature of the application should be ever evolving. Once dual parity is implemented, they shouldn't forget about it for 3 years (again), they should work on improving it somehow yet again. In my opinion they are missing the two biggest features of a storage solution and that is support for multiple drive failures and encryption. Without either of those they are never going to be an option for the corporate world.
  20. I remember some time ago there Limetech was offering discounted license keys for people who already own a license while unraid 6 was still in beta. Does anyone know if this is still going on and if so, where can I find information on it?
  21. According to http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131795 the mobo only supports 8GB of RAM.