charlieny100

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by charlieny100

  1. 25 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

    You'd need to physically disconnect the extra devices, or to avoid that, you can type (with the array stopped):

     

    echo 1 > /sys/block/sdX/device/delete

     

    Replace X with the correct letter of as many devices as needed to get you under the limit, then wait a few seconds and refresh the GUI to show the current number of devices, after you activate the Basic key you can reboot to bring the devices back online

     

    Thanks, that worked.

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, johnnie.black said:

    You already had a lot of errors before the current boot, so it will likely happen again.

    I took a look at the main page of my server and just noticed I only have one cache drive but should have two. It's not showing up anywhere else so I guess it is either a cable issue or the fact I bought a cheap no-name drive. 

  3. I'm getting what looks like a drive error filling up my log but I'm not well versed in this sort of thing. I attached the log but this is generally what I'm seeing: Nov  9 21:57:25 unraid kernel: BTRFS error (device sdb1): bdev /dev/sdc1 errs: wr 27433770, rd 21055357, flush 348255, corrupt 0, gen 0. It was all on the 9th and nothing beyond. Either it fixed itself or the log was full (which I was told it was full). Can someone help me.

    syslog.txt

  4. 11 minutes ago, slider162 said:

    I did open a ticket with USENETSERVER and they couldn't find anything wrong and they didn't hint at blocking anything.  I also opened a ticket with PIA and they didn't see anything wrong.  

     

    If they were blocking IP ranges, nothing would download.  The problem is, things do eventually successfully download with a lot of interruptions.

    Here has been my experience. I was a happy usenetserver customer for years using Windows. I switched to Ubuntu/docker and I could not get it to work with NZBGet and UNS via SSL. I tried different machines, different versions of Ubuntu - same results. I discovered Unraid and started using SAB/VPN and other than it being a little slower, it is flawless. The ticket I opened with UNS didn't get resolved but I found something that works. Not a solution, just a "I feel your pain" post.

  5. 56 minutes ago, jonathanm said:

    I'm not quite sure what you are saying. Can you screenshot the browser's configuration where you entered the proxy info?

     

    There is no way I know of to use privoxy to tunnel torrent traffic. It's purely for browser (or any application that reads web pages) use AFAIK.

    I attached a screenshot from my Mint network setup.

    Screen Shot 2018-09-03 at 1.24.05 PM.png

  6. 2 hours ago, jonathanm said:

    Yes. You have a problem with your browser configuration. Are you sure you specified to use the proxy for all protocols?

     

    I just verified using firefox on mint, both whatismyip.com and speedtest.net show the VPN endpoint address.

    I had to add http for the proxy so both https and http point to my unraid server. So that covers my browsers. If I were to use a torrent client (which I don't) I'd have to configure it to use the proxy too, correct?