olehj

Members
  • Content Count

    364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

34 Good

About olehj

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday June 3

Converted

  • Gender
    Male
  • URL
    https://ubrukelig.net
  • Location
    Norway

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I haven't tried and likely won't. I'll leave the docker and the page up, but I will end the "support" now due to decreasing popularity in mining and the dockerhub won't build for free automatic anymore.
  2. It sort of says it.. either lower mem clock, or increase power and/or fan speeds and see if that helps.. GPU's are individual, try different values..
  3. Check first page, first post 😛
  4. Don't use that version on the host (if you want to OC), haven't tried 470. The container handles the rest and are setup with default nvidia driver which will likely be replaced regardless - hence the missmatch. Nothing to worry about what's happening inside the container.
  5. Front page updated with Nvidia driver version and the clock table with additional information below it.
  6. If it requires additional start up flag, then probably not. If it just requires open ports/port mapping, you can set that up manually yourself in the template setup and check if you can connect to it. I won't be using more time with this docker container unless it stops working.
  7. Ye, had the same experience here. Not so much I can do about it. Maybe there's some conflict with the 465 drivers between docker and unraid even if it's built from the same source, or just a bug. Won't use time to investigate this as it's probably at the near end of the ethereum mining era. Stable 460 drivers work, so I'll write a note about it at the front page. Thanks for the info trhough.
  8. It should auto detect and install correct drivers. Maybe the location it download drivers from are down for maintenance or something. I can't check it now, but it worked for me yesterday.
  9. Nice, decided to fiddle around with your numbers.. and should have done a bit more fiddling earlier.. ended up with these results on the RTX 3070: Power limit: 120W (seems to be the minimum allowed for my card) Clock offset: -550 Memory offset: 2300 Fan: auto Hashrate: 60.2 MH/s - so apparently very effective!
  10. I have a RTX 3070 Gigabyte Gaming OC 8GB, but it sits inside a relatively hot server, so I expect some hashes might be lost just there. But it's important to compare with the same tools, maybe nicehash calculates hasrates differently as well. A fair comparison would be using nsfminer for windows and the one in linux/docker container, and then use nvidia-smi on both windows and linux to determine power usage (maybe also nvidia-smi shows the same clocks as well across platforms?).
  11. This might be related and known: https://www.reddit.com/r/EtherMining/comments/7lfbe0/windows_vs_linux_which_is_more_power_efficient/ What I noticed with my RTX 3080, is that I get way more stales in Windows than in Linux. Windows is about 6-10% stales (always some stales), in Linux 0-1% (mostly no stales). There might be more things into these things which might be hard to answer.
  12. And also, do you use the same tool to check the actual power usage, nvidia-smi? Some 3rd party tools might show different numbers, I dunno.. just a thought.
  13. I have no idea, different drivers perhaps (windows and Linux drivers might behave differently for all i know). I haven't tried it myself, but ensure that the gpu and memory clock is exactly the same (the input is different from windows and Linux drivers)