Jump to content

civic95man

Members
  • Posts

    224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by civic95man

  1. 39 minutes ago, chris B said:

    Is there a log/screen shot I can send you to verify?

    network settings should show that

     

    Diagnostics show this for interface eth2:

    Settings for eth2:
    	Supported ports: [ TP ]
    	Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 
    	                        100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 
    	                        1000baseT/Full 
    	Supported pause frame use: Symmetric
    	Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
    	Supported FEC modes: Not reported
    	Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 
    	                        100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 
    	                        1000baseT/Full 
    	Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
    	Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
    	Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
    	Speed: 1000Mb/s
    	Duplex: Full
    	Port: Twisted Pair
    	PHYAD: 1
    	Transceiver: internal
    	Auto-negotiation: on
    	MDI-X: on (auto)
    	Supports Wake-on: pumbg
    	Wake-on: g
    	Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
    			       drv probe link
    	Link detected: yes
    

    The rest show "link detected: no"

  2. Thats the correct place to look. Strange. You could try to delete both rsyslog.cfg and rsyslog.conf in the config directory on the flash drive and set up the "mirror syslog to flash" again.  That will clear the syslog server settings and allow you to start over fresh.

     

    I guess you could also try to setup a remote syslog server on another computer and have unraid send it there. kiwi syslog server seems to be a popular choice. 

  3. 31 minutes ago, mc_866 said:

    I'm still working to see if I can grab the most recent log. Which folder would that be in?

    they should be under "logs" on your flash drive

     

    41 minutes ago, mc_866 said:

    EDIT, changed network to bridge, think that's it.

    yes, that should work. Do note that docker assigns IP addresses itself to the container, not from your network DHCP server. So you may want to setup a valid reserve pool on your DHCP/PFSense box and assign that to the network bridge in docker.  That way you won't have address conflicts

  4. 7 minutes ago, mc_866 said:

    Is your thought to keep the static IP for unifi-controller, or abandon that and see if the trouble continues?

    If you don't feel like messing with vlans right now and just want to test things out, you can try to disable the static IPs for just the dockers.  It's best for unraid itself to keep a static IP and shouldn't be related to your call traces.

     

    is your pfsense setup on a vm?

  5. On 8/2/2020 at 3:11 PM, mc_866 said:

    This docker is running with a defined static IP

    From my experience, this is the cause of the call trace. 

    On 8/2/2020 at 3:11 PM, mc_866 said:

    Should I not run this with a static IP?

    My understanding is that if you don't have a static IP for your unifi-controller, you're going to have a hard time.  I had issues setting it and my network up until I gave the controller a static IP.  Same can be said for Plex.

    On 8/2/2020 at 4:42 PM, mc_866 said:

    Nothing to be concerned with for those irq traces then?

    Some say that those call traces are harmless, others have had issues when they occur, such as system instability or lockups.  Best to not risk it and just get those fixed.  My solution to this was to isolate all of my dockers to a separate vlan.  I *believe* those call traces are caused by broadcast packets which macvlan doesn't handle well but unifi doesn't seem to route them between vlans. This allowed me to keep the static IPs.

     

    As for the btrfs corruption, there may be a correlation between it and the call traces, or it could be something else unrelated.

     

    Good luck!

  6. 15 hours ago, McKnight said:

    Yep it has two Quad core E6530 cpus on an HP Z800 motherboard, was good fun getting it in a normal ATX case and converting the power. The bios sees both cpus.

    This may seem stupid but did you install both CPUs yourself, and I mean verify that they are both E5630?  I read somewhere that someone acquired a second hand server with different CPUs fitted - and it still seemed to boot/work.  Not even sure it its possible (also ready that the board can work with differing CPUs) so thats why I ask.  It may be a long shot

    8 hours ago, ChatNoir said:

    Did you try you HW on another OS ? Say an ubuntu live and check what is the base speed in that situation ?

    That would be a good starting point to see whats going on

  7. It really depends how you have the cores/threads assigned.  It seems that unraid uses the first core (or thread) for it's tasks so that should always be left for unraid. After that, you can assign the rest to whatever you want.  I'm sure you know this, but you should always assign threads with their corresponding cores to get the best performance.

     

    I always allocate my cores to my VMs from the bottom up

  8. *Maybe* try the 6.9 Beta and see if the new kernel fixes this?  I would personally try this either with an earlier beta, before the multiple pools were added, or try it on a spare flash drive to test everything out (or create a backup of your current flash drive and then upgrade to beta)

  9. 1 minute ago, uktz said:

    Now to find a KVM with display ports that's not $1500.. 

    http://www.avaccess.com/c803.html

     

    I would do more research on that one but it's $160 on amazon in the US.

     

    2 minutes ago, uktz said:

    Just so I understand a little bit better, basically, I'll have the IP KVM upstairs, dedicated CAT6 cable to it, and I can plug in all of my peripherals  to it, and control my server from a different location in my home?

    Yes, you plug the "transmitter" into the USB and HDMI on your computer.  Then plug the "receiver" into your monitor and USB devices (or would it be plugging your USB/Monitor into the receiver 🤔) at the remote location and connect the two with CAT6 cable. 

     

    Now you "could" connect them to your existing network but as I said, you are sharing bandwidth with everything else in the house.

    • Like 1
  10. Just now, uktz said:

    my server set to it's own static IP, as well as it's own subnet. Am I going to see any issues with this setup?

    I've honestly never used one of these before but it is my next planned "upgrade" so that I can keep my server in a cooler part of the house and out of the way.  AFAIK, they just sit on your network (plugged into a switch or directly connected to each other) and are "invisible" to other devices.  I have heard of them slowing down and/or halting the network so if that is a concern then maybe run a dedicated CAT6 just for that.

    • Like 1
  11. You can get a KVM to IP converter.  This will route the USB/HDMI to CAT5/6/etc IP traffic.  Install one on your server and another at the remote location and connect them via the network. 

     

    But keep in mind that some don't play very nicely with regular IP traffic so do some homework

     

    and the fix for the ryzen based servers are in that link (don't overclock/exceed RAM timings, BIOS settings)

  12. sudo echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan

    This should force a complete bus scan and re-add the previously removed (disconnected) device.

     

    Shouldn't cause any issues with already attached devices. I'm not around a *nix box at the moment otherwise I would try this, but I wonder if this would work:

    sudo echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:XX:XX.X/rescan

     

    I'm really curious if this will actually reduce your power consumption

  13. You don't really say what you are currently transcoding from and to.  I will assume that you are going from 1080 to 720 or SD.  Either way, I would say that a video card would definitely help you out.  I believe the P1000 is limited, or locked, to the number of streams, whereas the P2000 is unlimited - or limited only to what will fit into the memory.  You shouldn't have any problem with 8-12 concurrent 1080 transcoding streams using the P2000.  Video is much more demanding to transcode than audio so you should absolutely see a difference in performance.  Keep in mind that you will need a plexpass to take advantage of hardware transcoding.

  14. 2 minutes ago, BurntOC said:

    Isn't there a way to have the container grab an IP from my pfSense server?

    no, not that I know of. But you can manually assign one

    3 minutes ago, BurntOC said:

    have been able to grab IPs for various VLANs on my VMs in the past

    Because the VM is grabbing it, not unraid

     

    As far as I know, it would be a limitation of the Docker system

    • Like 1
  15. 2 hours ago, Aceriz said:

    as well continued to have the errors in the syslog

    Do these error only come up when the VM is active?

     

    2 hours ago, Aceriz said:

    any suggestions would be great

    maybe a second cheap video card if you have room on the board

     

    have you tried the 6.9 beta yet?  I would only proceed down that route with caution as it isn't declared stable yet. Maybe 6.9beta1 so you aren't messing with pools yet.  

     

    Last resort you could use a phone or tablet if available to manage the VMs

  16. your MCE seems to stem from this

    MCA: Generic CACHE Level-2 Eviction Error

    but it was corrected so I guess no real issue and it seems to be the only occurrence of it in your system.

     

    You could try accessing the IPMI logs and see if anything else was reported there.

     

    I would monitor it further and make sure that it doesn't show up again.  I would also make sure that nothing is overclocked (CPU).  You could try to update the BIOS and see if that offers any improvement with updated microcode (you're two releases behind), but I'm not a poweredge user so I don't know if that would open up another can of worms.

×
×
  • Create New...