-
Trying to get Nord VPN working through Unraid
In case anyone comes upon this topic in the future I was able to close the leak by adding --dns=(DNS of VPN service) to the Extra Parameters of the docker container.
-
Trying to get Nord VPN working through Unraid
I've been playing around with trying to get VPN working via the built-in VPN settings. I'm using Nord and I've extracted by private key, calculated my public key and know where to connect to, port, and public key for the nord server. I had all kinds of issues getting it going the 1st time, and decided to start over so I deleted the tunnel. I was testing with Firefox and I could not get it to connect to VPN no matter what I tried, after deleting the tunnel I couldn't connect to sites with the network set to bridge, but I could with it set to host. I eventually started over with Firefox, removed the docker, grabbed a fresh copy and it was working as expected. I then went back to the VPN settings and configured everything, the tunnel came up, I was getting bytes in and out. I set the network for Firefox to WG0 and was able to connect to the webUI, but it was extremely slow to type/click in the ui. I then went back out and switched back to Bridge and it was fine. I have no idea, but after causing a loop in the network which effectively locked me out of the web interface, and correcting it I Firefox is showing the IP of my VPN, however using dnsleaktest with either the standard or extendned tests I can see my ISP's ip address. Consulting an AI it suggests: # This forces the Firefox bridge to ONLY talk to the WireGuard interface iptables -A FORWARD -s 172.17.0.0/16 ! -o wg0 -j REJECT But frankly I don't think that's likely the right or best answer. Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm very suprised that there's not more setup guides for Nordlynx in Unraid unless I'm missing them, I see SpaceInvader has videos out for PIA. And Nord was a huge PIA to get keys out of, I don't know why they don't make that easy. My Nord sub is up in June of 27, should I be looking to switch (as a side question)?
-
Failed Disk 4, parity check in progress, but lots of errors on Disk 1, 2, and 3, but not others? Log also shows 100% full?
A reboot seems to have resolved the log, and errors continuously increasing on the other disks, now I just need to find the steps to remove Disk 4. Thanks!
-
-
Failed Disk 4, parity check in progress, but lots of errors on Disk 1, 2, and 3, but not others? Log also shows 100% full?
It appears that I've lost a data drive, which isn't terrible, but it's really odd that there's a ton of errors on both parity drives and Disk 1, 2, and 3 and they keep going up? I've attached my diagnostics if someone could offer sone advice? Ultimately I'd like to just remove Disk 4 (4TB drive) and maybe replace at a later time if I think I need to. Thanks everyone in advance! tower-diagnostics-20240504-1638.zip
-
Device is disabled error and next steps?
Thank you very much for your help! I really appreciate the link you sent as well, that was exactly what I needed. The drive is rebuilt and healthy now. I've deleted some old 'stuff' from the drive/shares, and set minimum free space on the shares that get heavily used. Thank you again!
-
Device is disabled error and next steps?
I was actually trying to resolve a merge issue with Veeam Agent for Windows by running a full backup, and my drive on the main PC is right at 2TB used... so yikes, I have some definite configuration issue going on here. I'll start the rebuild process (have to look up how to do that), and then it sounds like I need to set a minimum free space for my drives and then choose some different targets to overflow onto, if I'm using the right terminology?
-
Device is disabled error and next steps?
Good morning everyone, I was running a full backup of my main PC to my Unraid server and woke up this morning to a disabled device. Looks like it has had a write error, but there's currently no SMART errors reported on the dashboard for it. Could someone please take a look at my diagnostics and let me know what my next step should be? The disk is full it seems from the backup and I'm not sure if I have a misconfiguration or some action I should take to free space, there's several other drives in the server that are open to use, but aren't I believe because of the way it's set to use them. Thank you for reading, and any advice you could provide! tower-diagnostics-20230126-0819.zip
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Hmm, I missed the option... didn't see it I think, I would have checked that box.
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Ah, I didn't spot it! Thank you!! Though in the end I suppose it didn't really matter. I ran a new config and I have all my shares back and the parity disks are syncing now. Thanks everyone!
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
I'm hoping I won't have to deal with that for a long time, but I'll be taking extra steps I think to try to mark what's what. So in looking at the drives, I can tell which ones were the parity drives, and which 3 WD's were the data drives, the 1.2-1.8TB SAS dries didn't have any data on them yet since I had just recently brought up the Dell server and thankfully nothing had hit those drives yet. With the parity drives though I can't tell which was parity 1 and which was parity 2, does that matter, is there a way for me to determine that? Unassigned devices plugin helps to see that clearly with the parity/data, but luckily the two WD drives are WD80EFAX drives, so easy to tell apart from the data drives which are all WD80EMAZ... however, if I make a new config, does the order of the data drives matter?? I'm really hoping to (of course) not lose any data/backups/pictures, etc.
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Yes, both servers have (had?) RAID array controllers in them that connect the MB to the hot swap backplane. Both controllers though I had in HBA mode, so they pass through the disks directly, RAID functions are disabled in HBA mode, which may be a contributing factor here, but I think this is more a matter that the disks are identifying differently (with more information it seems?) than they were on the last controller.
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Sorry for the quick quoted reply, but I opened up the webui in Edge and it's populated, so I'm guessing some caching issue in Brave. Here's the Array/pool shots!
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
I'm going to have to reboot the server I guess, this happens once in a while, including on the old hardware as well, the drives are there but everything is blank.
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Hmm... not that I know of on the daily array health report, is there somewhere I can look that it might be stored? I do have the server in My Servers if there's anything that may be there? Diagnostics attached. tower-diagnostics-20220911-1617.zip
-
Failed hardware, moved to new and now have multiple missing drives
Hi everyone, Sadly I had a server that just decided to up and stop powering on at all, out of warranty of course and I don't have the funds to buy components to swap out hardware to see what failed (most likely motherboard I think). I've swapped from the (dead) Dell R730XD server to an HP DL380 Gen8 server, but Unraid isn't able to automatically recognize the drives, or at least most of them. I can work out what some of them are, but when I do select that it says "Wrong" now instead of missing. For the ones that I can't identify, because I have several WD 8TB drives, what can I do? I had two WD 8TB parity drives, and data drives consisting of three WD 8TB drives, one Seagate 4TB drive, and several other 1.2-1.8 SAS drives, some of those 1.2's I couldn't move into the HP server as I was missing enough drive trays to move them all. I did try to search the forums but didn't come up with something similar, likely my fault in search terms I think! I do have the HP P420i array controller in HBA mode thanks to another post on the forums, so I should be set there, but I think due to the controller differences it's getting more(?) information from the drives and that doesn't match what it had previously.
Steiner49er
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited