JT Marshall
-
Posts
21 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by JT Marshall
-
-
Sure didn’t. It’s not a deal breaker, just makes the ui look weird. It only stresses me out when I’m checking in on a docker issue so I haven’t spent too much time on it.
-
I’m having the same issue.
-
6 hours ago, JT Marshall said:
I’m thinking my disk1 (sdo) is in need of a replacement but maybe there is more I can do to try and correct its behavior?
Okay, parity check completed and I assume corrected the 9 errors, but that disk1 (sdo) has me worried. I definitely think I should replace it.
-
I added "1,200" raw read error rate and raw write error rate to my SMART attribute notifications per something I read on here. During my parity check I'm now getting read error rate warnings for (sdo). First rate was 327,693 and then 30 minutes later 3,473,409. I'm not entirely sure I know what that means but it doesn't seem good to be an order of magnitude higher 30 minutes later.
-
Okay, that's a relief. I'll mark this solved once the corrected parity is complete.
-
Been using Unraid for a few years now and this is my first batch of parity errors. During my monthly non-corrected parity check I got 9 errors, I immediately repeated the non-corrected parity check and got the same 9 errors. I've looked and the diagnostics but honestly I don't know what I'm looking for and how to proceed. I'm hoping someone on here can give me some guidance.
Thanks!
-
On 3/18/2022 at 3:33 AM, parsec. said:
Thermaltake Core W100 please.
I finally bit the bullet and made one for myself. Here is my version.
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, itimpi said:
I hope you find it useful. The plugin has been providing this sort of functionality ever since Unraid 6.7 and the core Unraid system still has some way to go before it catches up with the full functionality offered by the plugin.
if you encounter any issues using the plugin feel free to bring these up in the plugin’s support thread.
Much appreciated! I have it installed and I’m excited about never seeing parity during the day again!
-
16 hours ago, ChatNoir said:
No misunderstanding from your part.
6.10.3 suffered a regression bug on this new feature. It will be fixed in the next release. That would probably be 6.11 that is currently in open RC.
That’s too bad. That feature was part of the reason I was excited about 6.10. I didn’t know about Parity Check Tuning so I’ll give that a try.
-
4 hours ago, itimpi said:
If you do not want to try the 6.11 rc then use the Parity Check Tuning plugin to manage this instead as it will work on the Unraid release you are currently running. You also get additional functionality that you can invoke with the plugin that might be of use.
This is perfect. Thanks for the recommendation.
-
Well another month has gone by and my parity still is not running incrementally. Once parity starts it continues to go until completion. What am I doing wrong? I feel like this should start a parity check at 10pm on the first day of the month, run for 5 hours pause and do it again the next day. Repeat until complete. Am I misunderstanding this?
-
3 minutes ago, itimpi said:
No idea on the scheduling, but I notice that you have it set to be correcting.
We normally recommend that scheduled checks are set none-correcting so you do not have a drive that is misbehaving inadvertently corrupting parity. Then if you do get errors reported you can try and work out why and only when you are sure all hardware is behaving itself manually trigger a correcting check.
Discrepancy noted, and corrected. 😉
-
I recently changed my Parity Schedule to run under custom conditions. I wanted it to run every other month on the first Saturday of the month and only to run for 5 hours a day until parity is complete. Here is how I set it:
Scheduled parity check: Custom
Day of the week: Saturday
Week of the Month: First week
Time of the day: 00:00
Month of the year: January, March, May, July, September, November
Write corrections to parity: Yes
Cumulative parity check: Yes
Accumulation frequency: Daily
Accumulation duration: 5 hours
Today is the first day for the run and as of 10:55 my scheduled parity is still running. My understanding was that my parity would pause at 05:00 and resume daily until parity is complete. Are my assumptions incorrect or is this a bug buried in the custom schedule? In the interim I will switch my schedule to monthly and see if that works. Thoughts?
-
8 hours ago, bonienl said:
Delete the file "sensors.conf" on your flash device in the folder /config/plugins/dynamix.system.temp
I looked in my /boot folder with
find -iname "sensors.conf" -exec echo {} \;
and found nothing. /boot/config/plugins doesn't have a dynamix.system.temp folder, I believe because I removed that plugin as well. I checked in /etc and found a sensors.conf in /etc/sensors.d/ and removed that, rebooted and now I have no Airflow!
THANKS! Your guidance was helpful.
-
3 hours ago, trurl said:
Have you tried clearing browser cache?
Just tried that, it still persists even in private browsing mode.
-
3 hours ago, trurl said:
Have you tried rebooting?
Yes, I've uninstalled and rebooted.
-
So, I added the Dynamix System Autofan plugin which added the Airflow section to my Dashboard. Ultimately the plugin didn't work out for me so I removed it. Now I have the Airflow section orphaned on my Dashboard. How do I go about removing the Airflow?
-
Okay, so this is one that I took last night and then again this morning. It would appear that shortly after posting this the looping of the SAS card seemed to stop and the preclear progress picked back up. Maybe I'm just being overly cautious with the build but I really didn't understand what was happening. Still would like to understand what it was that I was seeing. Another symptom of this is that the drives that are connected to that SAS controller are not showing up in the Unassigned Devies section like their predecessors. I know I'm throwing a lot of information out there and don't expect it to all be relevant.
bifrost-diagnostics-20191003-0558.zip bifrost-diagnostics-20191003-1319.zip
-
Sorry if I'm not in the right place on this. I'm a new UnRaid user and just "completed" my first UnRaid build.
So I built this server:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 12-Core @ 3500 MHz
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X399 AORUS XTREME-CF
Nvidia Quadro P2000
2 LSI SAS 3008-8i for connectivity to Hot-Swap bays
It seemed to be running well for a few days until I started adding drives and running a preclear to test the new drives. I recently noticed that 2 of the drives seemed to have stalled out at about 90% of the pre-read. When I looked at the log I saw this:
Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: port enable: SUCCESS Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for end-devices: start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:2: handle(0x0009), sas_addr(0x4433221100000000) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:2: enclosure logical id(0x500605b000648d80), slot(3) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:3: handle(0x000a), sas_addr(0x4433221106000000) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:3: enclosure logical id(0x500605b000648d80), slot(4) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:4: handle(0x000b), sas_addr(0x4433221107000000) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: scsi target12:0:4: enclosure logical id(0x500605b000648d80), slot(5) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for end-devices: complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for end-devices: start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for PCIe end-devices: complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for expanders: start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: search for expanders: complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: _base_fault_reset_work: hard reset: success Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: removing unresponding devices: start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: removing unresponding devices: end-devices Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: Removing unresponding devices: pcie end-devices Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: removing unresponding devices: expanders Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: removing unresponding devices: complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: expanders start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: break from expander scan: ioc_status(0x0022), loginfo(0x310f0400) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: expanders complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: end devices start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: break from end device scan: ioc_status(0x0022), loginfo(0x310f0400) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: end devices complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: pcie end devices start Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: log_info(0x3003011d): originator(IOP), code(0x03), sub_code(0x011d) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: log_info(0x3003011d): originator(IOP), code(0x03), sub_code(0x011d) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: break from pcie end device scan: ioc_status(0x0021), loginfo(0x3003011d) Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: pcie devices: pcie end devices complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: scan devices: complete Oct 2 21:17:43 FileServer kernel: program smartctl is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO Oct 2 21:17:44 FileServer kernel: sd 12:0:4:0: Power-on or device reset occurred Oct 2 21:17:44 FileServer kernel: program smartctl is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO Oct 2 21:17:44 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: fault_state(0x5862)! Oct 2 21:17:44 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: sending diag reset !! Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: diag reset: SUCCESS Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer rc.diskinfo[6400]: SIGHUP ignored - already refreshing disk info. Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: CurrentHostPageSize is 0: Setting default host page size to 4k Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: _base_display_fwpkg_version: complete Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: LSISAS3008: FWVersion(16.00.01.00), ChipRevision(0x02), BiosVersion(08.37.00.00) Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: Protocol=( Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: Initiator Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,Target Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ), Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: Capabilities=( Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: TLR Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,EEDP Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,Snapshot Buffer Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,Diag Trace Buffer Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,Task Set Full Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ,NCQ Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: ) Oct 2 21:17:45 FileServer kernel: mpt3sas_cm1: sending port enable !!This sequence of messages repeated over and over led me down the google path finding this Bug Link and this another Bug Link. I'm wondering what I should be doing here. Am I screwed? Is this something I can fix or should I look into returning my HBAs? I'm hoping for a little guidance here...
Display Network-Name instead ofp Network-ID in GUI?
in General Support
Posted
That’s a work around that I’ve used before. I prefer using docker compose due to its portability but that’s a totally viable alternative.