May 12, 20215 yr Hello! Let's say I have a root share called `Media.` All of the contents (up to this point) are moved here; however, there are many folders in 'Media,' so no caching of any sort is enabled. Within the 'Media' folder, I have two folders within that share that are written to on a daily basis, and can be accessed multiple times by several people. I was thinking of enabling caching for these two 'high access' folders, but I wasn't sure if a share within share would cause any issues when it comes to enabling caching. In summary, I'd like to confirm: \Media [root share, no cache enabled, no change] \Media\high_acces1 [potential new share, enable caching ok?] \Media\high_access2 [potential new share, enable caching ok?]
May 13, 20215 yr Author well that answers that question I think I might be ok if I make the root `Media` share part of the cache pool as most of my reads/writes are going to the "high_access" folders. And I'll have mover empty the cache pool if it gets over a specified size.
May 13, 20215 yr Do the two directories in your example (high_access1 and high_access2) need to be subdirectories of the Media share? Couldn't they be top level shares in their own right? That might provide the flexibility you need.
May 13, 20215 yr Author I could, but there are dependencies that, frankly, I'm too lazy to address. But that would be the best way to address it, yes.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.