November 14, 20223 yr So this is a repeatable error. Within five minutes of parity completing (or being cancelled) unraid crashes itself. Total shutdown. I started mirroring syslog to flash and attached the file below. Please help! I cannot see what is causing the problem. Should I downgrade back to 6.10? fractaltower-diagnostics-20221114-1020.zip
November 14, 20223 yr Community Expert 4 minutes ago, clay_statue said: I started mirroring syslog to flash and attached the file below. It's not, just the regular diags.
November 14, 20223 yr Author Here's the syslog file and the last entries. I deliberately cancelled the parity to see if it would crash, which it did a few minutes later. Nov 14 10:26:12 FractalTower kernel: docker0: port 1(veth440e05a) entered disabled state Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: docker0: port 1(vethb74e54b) entered blocking state Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: docker0: port 1(vethb74e54b) entered disabled state Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: device vethb74e54b entered promiscuous mode Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: eth0: renamed from veth6b04af4 Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): vethb74e54b: link becomes ready Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: docker0: port 1(vethb74e54b) entered blocking state Nov 14 10:38:40 FractalTower kernel: docker0: port 1(vethb74e54b) entered forwarding state Nov 14 10:40:38 FractalTower kernel: mdcmd (37): nocheck cancel Nov 14 10:40:38 FractalTower kernel: md: recovery thread: exit status: -4 syslog.txt
November 14, 20223 yr Community Expert Nothing relevant logged, and it looks more like a hardware problem, but go back to v6.10 to see if it still doesn't happen there.
November 15, 20223 yr Author 5 hours ago, JorgeB said: Nothing relevant logged, and it looks more like a hardware problem, but go back to v6.10 to see if it still doesn't happen there. Was digging around and found this warning in the syslog from when it was booting... ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): 32/64X length mismatch in FADT/Gpe0Block:
November 15, 20223 yr Author I've restored previous version 6.9.x since that was what I upgraded from. I'm going to hold steady here at this version for a minute and make sure everything is copacetic before venturing into 6.10.x. Maybe 6.12.x will be released in the meanwhile and the bug will be contained to the previous version so i can leapfrog right over it.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.