October 15, 20232 yr Hello, I have a couple of 8TB toshiba drives that I've had for a few years which recently started both saying there are some seek error rates in the smart report, however I'm not sure how to interpret the report. Are these just one off errors that could have been caused by a bad cable connection? Or are these drives legitimately failing and I need to put in replacements immediately? I've attached the smart reports to this post. TOSHIBA_HDWG180_X040A052FBEG-20231014-2301.txt TOSHIBA_HDWG180_X040A0CEFBEG-20231014-2300.txt
October 15, 20232 yr Community Expert If you want to test the drives run the extended SMART tests on them. If that fails they need replacing.
October 15, 20232 yr Community Expert That is common with some Toshiba drives, most likely a firmware issue, disks should be fine, but like mentioned run an extended test.
October 15, 20232 yr Author 5 hours ago, JorgeB said: That is common with some Toshiba drives, most likely a firmware issue, disks should be fine, but like mentioned run an extended test. I can't seem to get an extended or short test to even run on either of the drives, it tries and then a few seconds later says "Completed: unknown failure". The SMART error log is empty for both drives. Edited October 15, 20232 yr by sazrocks
October 16, 20232 yr Author Looking at the smart reports now, they now say "Past" for the seek error rate row. How can it go from "Failing" to "Past"? TOSHIBA_HDWG180_X040A052FBEG-20231015-1832.txt TOSHIBA_HDWG180_X040A0CEFBEG-20231015-1831.txt
October 16, 20232 yr Community Expert 7 hours ago, sazrocks said: How can it go from "Failing" to "Past"? That means it failed in the past but is not failing now. 15 hours ago, sazrocks said: I can't seem to get an extended or short test to even run on either of the drives, Run a non correcting parity check, it's basically the same as an extended SMART test.
October 16, 20232 yr Author 10 hours ago, JorgeB said: Run a non correcting parity check, it's basically the same as an extended SMART test. Unfortunately the drives are both in a ZFS pool, so I can't do this. Should I run a scrub as the equivelant?
October 17, 20232 yr Community Expert Scrub only reads the used part of the disk, so not equivalent to an extended SMART test or a parity check which read the full disk surface.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.