October 4, 201114 yr My server froze during the night for some reason. I was anticipating fireworks upon reboot and I was not disappointed. The final drive took over 23 minutes to replay all the Reiserfs transactions. A new record for me, but I haven't had a "dirty shutdown" in over a year. What is the longest you've seen? BTW, parity check hasn't found any errors yet - fingers crossed. Oct 4 07:03:43 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md4): replayed 232 transactions in 926 seconds Oct 4 07:03:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md4): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:05:37 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md3): replayed 246 transactions in 1041 seconds Oct 4 07:05:39 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md3): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:05:55 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md8): replayed 256 transactions in 1059 seconds Oct 4 07:05:57 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md8): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:07:41 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md5): replayed 286 transactions in 1165 seconds Oct 4 07:07:42 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md5): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:08:09 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md13): replayed 293 transactions in 1193 seconds Oct 4 07:08:10 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md13): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:08:13 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md2): replayed 292 transactions in 1197 seconds Oct 4 07:08:13 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md2): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:08:45 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md17): replayed 290 transactions in 1229 seconds Oct 4 07:08:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md17): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:08:48 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md10): replayed 321 transactions in 1232 seconds Oct 4 07:08:51 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md10): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:08:51 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md9): replayed 315 transactions in 1234 seconds Oct 4 07:08:53 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md9): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:09:26 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md11): replayed 330 transactions in 1270 seconds Oct 4 07:09:28 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md11): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:09:37 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md16): replayed 314 transactions in 1280 seconds Oct 4 07:09:39 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md16): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:09:53 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md6): replayed 334 transactions in 1297 seconds Oct 4 07:09:54 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md6): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:10:04 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md14): replayed 354 transactions in 1308 seconds Oct 4 07:10:04 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md14): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:10:09 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md7): replayed 353 transactions in 1313 seconds Oct 4 07:10:10 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md7): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:10:14 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md15): replayed 357 transactions in 1318 seconds Oct 4 07:10:14 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md15): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:10:32 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md18): replayed 397 transactions in 1336 seconds Oct 4 07:10:33 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md18): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:10:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md1): replayed 397 transactions in 1350 seconds Oct 4 07:10:46 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md1): Using r5 hash to sort names Oct 4 07:11:39 Tower kernel: REISERFS (device md12): replayed 651 transactions in 1402 seconds
October 4, 201114 yr That seems like allot of unsync'ed data. Was there stuff on the cache drive that was moved and yet not sync'ed?
October 4, 201114 yr Author I only use a cache drive with one of my data drives - which was one of the first to mount. I don't know why it had so many transactions to replay, but I'm glad it is such a robust file system.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.