dboonthego Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 I'm converting my FS from Reiser to XFS. I kicked off a disk to disk copy of disk1 to disk3 using rsync -avPX /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk3/ which took 10.5 hours to complete. Before executing the copy, I unassigned the parity disk to help increase the write speed. My math: Disk 1 reports a used size of: 1,994,207,632,134 bytes Divide 1,994,207,632,134 by 1,000,000 ~ equals 1,994,207 Megabytes 10.5hours * 3600 = 37,800 seconds 1,994,207MB / 37,800sec = [glow=red,2,300]52.76MB/s[/glow] 52MB/s is inline with the average transfer speed on the OSD, but I expected this to complete much faster with parity disabled. Is my expectation unreasonable? I know speeds can vary across different hardware so here is mine: Disk1: WDC-WD20EARX 2TB 5400RPM (green) <-- source Disk3: WDC_WD20EZRZ 2TB 5400RPM (blue) <--destination Mobo: ASUS Z170M-PLUS CPU: Intel Celeron G3900 2.9GHz unRAID v6.2.4 Link to comment
JorgeB Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Sounds about right, maybe a little on the slow side, rsync is not the fastest way to transfer, also depends on the average file size. Last time I did that, also without parity it was about 4 Hours per TB, mostly large files. Link to comment
dboonthego Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 Anything I can check out to see why it is on the slower side? All my stuff is new except for disk1 which is about 3-4 years old. Link to comment
JorgeB Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 If you have mostly large files disk1 is probably the main reason for it being a little slower, it probably has 500GB or 667GB platters, next one should be a little faster if both disks involved are 1TB/platter. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.