September 23, 20196 yr Should I be worried about speed of the disk checks Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:56 minutes Current position:227 GB (7.6 %) Estimated speed:67.0 MB/sec Estimated finish:11 hours, 29 minutes System specs Supermicro - X9SRL-F Intel e5-1650 v2 64 gb ram ecc HP H220 - Broadcom / LSI SAS2308 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 (rev 05) Intel dc3700 400gb (cache) USB [0:0:0:0] disk Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1.00 /dev/sda 15.4GB Harddrives [8:0:0:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdb 3.00TB [8:0:1:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdc 3.00TB [8:0:2:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdd 3.00TB [8:0:3:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sde 3.00TB [8:0:4:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdf 3.00TB [8:0:5:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdg 3.00TB [8:0:6:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdh 3.00TB [8:0:7:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdi 3.00TB [8:0:8:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdj 3.00TB [8:0:9:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdk 3.00TB [8:0:10:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdl 3.00TB [8:0:11:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdm 3.00TB [8:0:12:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdn 3.00TB [8:0:13:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdo 3.00TB [8:0:14:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdp 3.00TB [8:0:15:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdq 3.00TB [8:0:16:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdr 3.00TB [8:0:17:0] disk ATA ST3000DM001-1CH1 CC44 /dev/sds 3.00TB [8:0:18:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdt 3.00TB [8:0:19:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdu 3.00TB [8:0:20:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdv 3.00TB [8:0:21:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdw 3.00TB [8:0:22:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdx 3.00TB [8:0:23:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdy 3.00TB Cache [N:0:0:1] disk INTEL SSDPEDMD400G4__1 /dev/nvme0n1 400GB unraid-diagnostics-20190923-1159.zip Edited September 29, 20196 yr by Konijntjes
September 23, 20196 yr Author Something is "wrong" and its climbing fast. Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:1 hour, 5 minutes Current position:260 GB (8.7 %) Estimated speed:38.2 MB/sec Estimated finish:19 hours, 56 minutes Sync errors corrected:488247
September 23, 20196 yr Community Expert 19 minutes ago, Konijntjes said: Estimated speed:67.0 MB/sec Try de tunables tester scrip, default tunables are not very good for larger arrays, also note that if you're using a single link between the HBA and the expander max speed will be around 90MB/s, usu dual link if possible. 12 minutes ago, Konijntjes said: Sync errors corrected:488247 These usually mean parity is not in sync, unless you're getting disk errors, is this 1st parity check?
September 23, 20196 yr Author 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: Try de tunables tester scrip, default tunables are not very good for larger arrays, also note that if you're using a single link between the HBA and the expander max speed will be around 90MB/s, usu dual link if possible. Dont know if the BPN-SAS2-846EL1 of my SuperMicro can handle 2 sas connections. 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: These usually mean parity is not in sync, unless you're getting disk errors, is this 1st parity check? Yes this is the first parity check
September 23, 20196 yr Community Expert 1 hour ago, Konijntjes said: Dont know if the BPN-SAS2-846EL1 of my SuperMicro can handle 2 sas connections. It can, supports dual link. 1 hour ago, Konijntjes said: Yes this is the first parity check Then likely parity wasn't in sync.
September 23, 20196 yr Author On 9/23/2019 at 5:04 PM, johnnie.black said: It can, supports dual link. Then likely parity wasn't in sync. Thanks for the help but the server is on hold at the moment. Most likely i killed the motherboard. Or it killed it self IPMI seems dead same as vga but it boots to unraid. Edited September 24, 20196 yr by Konijntjes
September 24, 20196 yr Author On 9/23/2019 at 5:04 PM, johnnie.black said: It can, supports dual link. Then likely parity wasn't in sync. Of the 2 connections there are on the backplane witch do i need to use. The manual isnt that clear about it ( still waiting on the 2e cable )
September 24, 20196 yr Community Expert Supermicro recommends J1 and J2, though it will likely work with either 2 of the 3 ports.
September 27, 20196 yr Author On 9/24/2019 at 8:30 PM, johnnie.black said: Supermicro recommends J1 and J2, though it will likely work with either 2 of the 3 ports. Thanks. The parity check is much faster. Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:38 minutes Current position:221 GB (7.4 %) Estimated speed:98.1 MB/sec Estimated finish:7 hours, 52 minutes unraid-diagnostics-20190927-2336.zip
September 29, 20196 yr Author Thanks to johnnie.black is the performance up to 130 mb/s parity. Marking this topic as solved.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.