Jump to content

BTRFS Workers when no BTRFS Filesystem? Normal?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As I was trouble shooting my Terabytes of writes to my Cache drive the consensus has been to not use BTRFS as the filesystem on the cache. I also changed a few dockers to Linuxserver versions (plex, radarr, sonarr, etc... anything that can be linuxserver is linuxserver). No encrypted devices either.

 

I switched everything to XFS but I still see btrfs "kworkers" doing things. Is this normal? I'm also still seeing a ton of writes from loop2. I mostly troubleshot this on Reddit where everyone who switched to XFS saw a crazy number of writes go way down. I'm just trying to see did I do this properly. Below is a snapshot of my iotop showing all those workers.

 

 

Total DISK READ :      22.29 M/s | Total DISK WRITE :     214.80 M/s
Actual DISK READ:      25.52 M/s | Actual DISK WRITE:     227.95 M/s
  TID  PRIO  USER     DISK READ  DISK WRITE  SWAPIN     IO>    COMMAND                                                      
20004 be/4 root        0.00 B/s   13.07 K/s  0.00 % 19.09 % [kworker/u65:14+btrfs-endio-write]
17469 be/4 root        0.00 B/s   39.20 K/s  0.00 % 16.76 % [kworker/u65:6+btrfs-endio-write]
 1957 be/4 root        0.00 B/s   13.07 K/s  0.00 % 14.39 % [kworker/u65:12+btrfs-endio-write]
10390 be/0 root        9.40 M/s  114.31 M/s  0.00 % 10.95 % [loop2]
28072 be/4 root       13.07 K/s  509.64 K/s  0.00 %  8.69 % [kworker/u64:1-btrfs-submit]
30178 be/4 nobody      4.90 M/s  721.98 K/s  0.00 %  2.78 % Plex Transcoder -codec:0 hevc -~-4ed1-b8d9-7f2e8280d292/progress
21217 be/4 root      382.23 K/s 1450.50 K/s  0.00 %  2.54 % [kworker/u64:0-btrfs-submit]
19173 be/4 nobody     13.07 K/s   75.62 M/s  0.00 %  2.27 % mono --debug Radarr.exe -nobrowser -data=/config
19174 be/4 nobody      3.27 K/s   19.16 M/s  0.00 %  1.94 % mono --debug Radarr.exe -nobrowser -data=/config
18640 be/4 root      189.48 K/s  875.53 K/s  0.00 %  1.75 % [kworker/u64:2-btrfs-submit]
15556 be/4 root       13.07 K/s  104.54 K/s  0.00 %  1.64 % [kworker/u66:10-btrfs-worker]
16391 be/4 nobody   1950.34 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.71 % mono --debug Radarr.exe -nobrowser -data=/config [Finalizer]
 1386 be/4 root      225.42 K/s   16.33 K/s  0.00 %  0.62 % shfs /mnt/user -disks 16777215 ~time,allow_other -o remember=330
16390 be/4 nobody    793.86 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.34 % mono --debug Radarr.exe -nobrowser -data=/config [SGen worker]
 1726 be/4 root       13.07 K/s   65.34 K/s  0.00 %  0.20 % [kworker/u66:0-btrfs-worker]
19172 be/4 nobody     26.14 K/s   39.20 K/s  0.00 %  0.13 % mono --debug Radarr.exe -nobrowser -data=/config
13439 be/4 root       13.07 K/s   52.27 K/s  0.00 %  0.11 % [kworker/u66:9-btrfs-worker]
17662 be/4 nobody    836.33 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.11 % Plex Media Server
 1395 be/4 root      437.76 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.10 % shfs /mnt/user -disks 16777215 ~time,allow_other -o remember=330
 1392 be/4 root      339.76 K/s   13.07 K/s  0.00 %  0.08 % shfs /mnt/user -disks 16777215 ~time,allow_other -o remember=330
17663 be/4 nobody    166.61 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.07 % Plex Media Server
24303 be/4 nobody    568.44 K/s   13.07 K/s  0.00 %  0.07 % python3 /app/tautulli/Tautulli.py --datadir /config
 5316 be/4 root       52.27 K/s  182.95 K/s  0.00 %  0.07 % [kworker/u66:4-flush-btrfs-1]
18465 be/4 nobody     55.54 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.06 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]
11290 be/4 root        0.00 B/s   13.07 K/s  0.00 %  0.05 % [kworker/u65:8+btrfs-endio-write]
 7998 be/4 nobody     55.54 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.05 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]
13188 be/4 root       26.14 K/s   91.47 K/s  0.00 %  0.05 % [kworker/u66:7-flush-btrfs-1]
 8008 be/4 nobody     45.74 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.04 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]
13076 be/4 nobody    104.54 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.04 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]
 1387 be/4 root      238.48 K/s   22.87 K/s  0.00 %  0.04 % shfs /mnt/user -disks 16777215 ~time,allow_other -o remember=330
32016 be/4 root       13.07 K/s  104.54 K/s  0.00 %  0.04 % [kworker/u66:24-btrfs-endio-write]
 8010 be/4 nobody    179.68 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.04 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]
 1303 be/4 root      117.61 K/s    6.53 K/s  0.00 %  0.04 % shfs /mnt/user -disks 16777215 ~time,allow_other -o remember=330
18187 be/4 root        0.00 B/s   26.14 K/s  0.00 %  0.04 % [kworker/u65:7+btrfs-endio-write]
 8013 be/4 nobody     19.60 K/s    0.00 B/s  0.00 %  0.04 % mono --debug Sonarr.exe -nobrow~ -data=/config [Thread Pool Wor]

 

Edited by Wavey
Posted
1 minute ago, Wavey said:

Is this normal?

Yes, docker image is still btrfs, but it shouldn't case high writes on a xfs filesystem, though if you want the latest beta allows xfs for the docker image.

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, johnnie.black said:

Yes, docker image is still btrfs, but it shouldn't case high writes on a xfs filesystem, though if you want the latest beta allows xfs for the docker image.

Ah ok at least I know they should be there.

 

Yeah my cache is getting about 80-100TB a month written to it. It's 1 years old and is at 755TB written to it, soooooo yeah.

 

I have a second unraid system that the cache is 4.5 years old that has about 65TB written to it. Both have Plex installed, commented this because from other posts I've noticed this is a culprit so it's probably not in my case.

Edited by Wavey
Posted

btrfs docker image or vdisks on a btrfs filesystem can and usually does have a very high write amplification, but a btrfs docker image on a xfs filesystem should not be a problem, recently released v6.9-beta25 also mostly fixes this problem for btrfs filesystems, though btrfs will always have more writes than xfs due to being a COW filesystem.

  • Like 1
Posted

Sorry to hijack this thread, but I wan ran into an interesting issue. So I am in the process of settign up a new system I setup my cache drive, made sure that everything was working. Mounted and formatted the drive with btrfs. Then I swapped the Hardware as soon as it became available, now when I look at the system, It tells me that the Cache is healthy and active but the mount say No filesystem. If i go to /mnt/cache it also tells me that location does not exist.

 

Looking at the error logs

 

Jul 22 10:16:01 Tower kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x7000 SErr 0x4090000 action 0xe frozen

...

Jul 22 10:27:22 Tower kernel: BTRFS error (device sdc1): parent transid verify failed on 26034176 wanted 56 found 19
Jul 22 10:27:22 Tower kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdc1): failed to read fs tree: -5

...

Jul 22 10:27:22 Tower emhttpd: /mnt/cache mount error: No file system

 

So am I looking at a Bad Drive, Cable, something else?

I was mapping an NTFS drive to copy data to the Disk 1 partition and started and stopped the array in rapid succession.

also the drive does have one Uncorrectable error count

 

Dashboard.thumb.png.10250252ae1c1e34065450a6191f3a67.pngMain.thumb.png.a2a8833737beee1986b27df52bc30993.png

Posted
7 minutes ago, Matthew_K said:

parent transid verify failed

This means there were lost writes sometime in the past and it's usually a fatal error, you need to re-format the cache, if there's important data here are some recovery options, btrfs restore is likely the best for this.

 

P.S. next time please create your own thread since it's unrelated to the OP.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/22/2020 at 1:03 PM, johnnie.black said:

btrfs docker image or vdisks on a btrfs filesystem can and usually does have a very high write amplification, but a btrfs docker image on a xfs filesystem should not be a problem, recently released v6.9-beta25 also mostly fixes this problem for btrfs filesystems, though btrfs will always have more writes than xfs due to being a COW filesystem.

my cache writes dropped by 75%, thanks for the information!

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...