-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Got it. That fixed the issue and its running BTFRS operation to sync the data. Thanks Again.
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
I plug into another PC and it reads the drive was able to open and format the drive fine. I'm going to shutdown and restart see if that makes any difference.
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Added the new drive and now its not showing up in the drop down list. This was the one I originally tried to add. You think this is causing an issue?
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Thanks for the help. Saved me hours of work. Going to make a back up this time first and then swap the drive.
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
FYI - Beer money sent.
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Thanks. Here is the latest Diag. amacher-diagnostics-20250206-1001.zip
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Okay thanks. Here are the diags amacher-diagnostics-20250206-0933.zip
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
I stopped and restarted the Array and now see my cache drive!! Thanks! I'll send beer money! How can I replace 1 of the drives and not have this happen again?
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Here is the output root@amacher:~# btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: f79cb3e6-b693-4a91-8cd9-4fc819da001e Total devices 2 FS bytes used 150.59GiB devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 151.06GiB path /dev/sdi1 devid 3 size 931.51GiB used 153.00GiB path /dev/sdb1
-
Cache drives Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system
Yes it was. Here is the output root@amacher:~# sfdisk /dev/sdi Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.38.1). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdi: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: WDC WD10EADX-22T Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes sfdisk is going to create a new 'dos' disk label. Use 'label: <name>' before you define a first partition to override the default. Type 'help' to get more information. >>> 64 Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0xcc430fa1. Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 931.5 GiB. Partition #1 contains a btrfs signature. Do you want to remove the signature? [Y]es/[N]o:
-
Cache: Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system (after update)
@trurl
-
Cache: Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system (after update)
Here is the fdisk command is this recoverable? root@amacher:~# btrfs fi show warning, device 1 is missing warning, device 1 is missing ERROR: cannot read chunk root Label: none uuid: f79cb3e6-b693-4a91-8cd9-4fc819da001e Total devices 2 FS bytes used 150.59GiB devid 3 size 931.51GiB used 153.00GiB path /dev/sdb1 *** Some devices missing root@amacher:~# fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: WDC WDS100T1R0A Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sdb1 2048 1953525167 1953523120 931.5G 83 Linux root@amacher:~# fdisk -l /dev/sdi Disk /dev/sdi: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disk model: WDC WD10EADX-22T Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
-
Cache: Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system (after update)
I get this in the array operations Unmountable disk present: Cache • WDC_WDS100T1R0A-68A4W0_24506J804746 (sdb) Cache 2 • WDC_WD10EADX-22TDHB0_WD-WCAV5V485415 (sdi)
-
Cache: Unmountable: Unsupported or no file system (after update)
Yes I placed the original two back in they were btrfs I believe.
Jeff Amacher
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited