Jump to content

buzzra

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by buzzra

  1. If I go to the homepage listed in the OP, https://nginxproxymanager.jc21.com, and then click on the githublink on that page, I get a different github repository than listed in the OP, https://github.com/jlesage/docker-nginx-proxy-manager. So which one is the correct one? It appears that the Unraid template is using the jlesage repository, but in a previous post here, someone requested feature requests and bugs be reported to the jc21 repository. So, what's the difference and which one should we be using? If I'm using jlesage version on Unraid, why report bugs to jc21?

     

    buzz 

  2. What's the trick to using the F-keys from webterminal? I can't seem to make anything work but the arrow and tab keys. 

     

    Thanks

    buzz

     

    Edit: Never mind I figured it out. I was remoting from work to my home PC and launching webterminal. That won't work. F-keys get lost in the translation.

  3. On 6/23/2017 at 8:25 PM, CommandLionInterface said:

    I'm not normally one to revive old threads but seeing as this is the top result if you google "chrome os unraid" I thought I'd post the answer.

     

    Google doesn't provide an ISO for chrome OS, but the chromium project provides chromium OS images for download. They're similar, chrome os is based on chromium os.

     

    https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os

     

    https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/how-tos-and-troubleshooting/running-chromeos-image-under-virtual-machines

    Another rival of an old thread, but it is still the #1 search result.

    The above links to the Chromium Project do NOT provide images you can download. They provide the source code and instructions on how to build your own image. There are sites that provide pre-built images, and one of the most popular is Arnold The Bat's.

     

    buzz

  4. 3 hours ago, aptalca said:

     


    Unraid template hasn't been updated with the changelog but the image is being updated. The docker hub page should have a more up to date changelog.

    Currently it is the same as the letsencrypt one except it is missing the cert parts and fail2ban

     

     

    3 hours ago, dockerPolice said:

    While I understand why you guys don't do this, as a whole, changelogs on docker templates (the plugin guys are all awesome though at it) not being updated is far and away my biggest pet-peeve.

     

    To the point that I'm contemplating removing the date updated text from the description and leaving it only displaying in the popup.

     

    Pop up already has this in it: 

     

     

    Thanks @aptalca that's just what I wanted to know. Any plans for fail2ban coming to this docker? Not a big deal, just wondering.

    Also, I read that the letsencrypt docker only does letsencrypt on one domain. If I wanted to use the LetsEncrypt service with multiple domains, Would it be best for me to try and modify this docker, or to start with the letsencrypt docker?

    Thanks again for the help and your work at LS!

     

    @dockerPolice, Sorry I didn't scroll down on the pop up to see that. Is there anyway for me to help in keeping these up to date, or does this need to be done by the maintainer?

     

    buzz

     

  5. Is this Nginx docker still being supported/updated? The LS hub.docker.com page shows it was last updated June 6th 2017, but the unRAID CA page shows it was last updated December 5, 2015. I already have wild card certs for my domains, so I do not need LetsEncrypt. I just need an Nginx proxy for my other dockers.

     

    Thanks for ALL the great work and support from the LinuxServer.io team!

     

    buzz

  6. 24 minutes ago, buzzra said:

    Well, apparently the infozip package is downloaded and installed, but the unzip command is not found.

     

    buzz

    Aaaannd... My upgrade is complete. I used the removepkg command to remove infozip, and did the wget and installpkg commands to manually re-install it. I then re-ran the installplg command and all is up and working! Here is the wget command for infozip:

    wget http://slackware.cs.utah.edu/pub/slackware/slackware-13.1/slackware/a/infozip-6.0-i486-1.txz -O /boot/extra/infozip-6.0-i486-1.txz

    Thanks

    buzz

  7. 34 minutes ago, buzzra said:

    Hey all,

    Just tried Method 1. Plugin install fails with:

     

    unzip: command not found

    unzip error 0

     

    Does the plugin not download infozip anymore? I didn't see it go by on the console. I am upgrading from v5.0.5.

     

    Thanks

    buzz

    Well, apparently the infozip package is downloaded and installed, but the unzip command is not found.

     

    buzz

  8. Hey all,

    Just tried Method 1. Plugin install fails with:

     

    unzip: command not found

    unzip error 0

     

    Does the plugin not download infozip anymore? I didn't see it go by on the console. I am upgrading from v5.0.5.

     

    Thanks

    buzz

  9. Record the serial numbers of the drives or take screenshots of unRAID main. Then use the New Config utility. Assign the desired disks and rebuild parity. Then do a parity check.

     

    Thanks dgaschk!

    Sorry for the delay in replying. Followed your instructions exactly and the array is once again protected, parity is checked and valid, and all data is intact!

    Now to get another 3TB or more drive.

     

    buzz

  10. Hello all,

     

    I replaced a 1TB drive with a pre-cleared 3TB drive. When I set the new drive to the old and started the array, the drive threw some errors and was disabled. I tried to put the old 1TB back in, but unRAID tells me the disk must be equal or bigger than the original.

    I know I can get a new 3TB drive and pre-clear it and put it in the array, but that will take some time. My array is running in an un-protected state, and I don't want to leave it that way very long. Is there any way to get the array to accept the old drive back into its original slot?

     

    Thanks,

    buzz

×
×
  • Create New...